Your submission at Articles for creation: Prysm, Inc. (July 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dr. Kadzi were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
  Kadzi  (talk) 10:43, 20 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Preshtha Kalsyan! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!   Kadzi  (talk) 10:43, 20 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prysm, Inc. (July 27)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eternal Shadow was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Eternal Shadow Talk 22:14, 27 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Declare any connection

edit

Hi Worldbruce, Hope you're safe, and thanks for your quick turnaround. First of all, I am not being paid to write about this. I am a freelance content writer and I am out of work for many months due to lockdown. I am voluntarily writing this as it's my hobby to write and pen-down views and I felt that this particular topic should be there on Wikipedia as I will be writing a series of articles on how people made it big despite of any godfather or financial support.

Hey Worldbruce, How you doing? Why do you feel this is a paid contribution? I am not employed since March and I am trying to create a portfolio for myself. I want to present this to the recruiters that my articles got published in Wikipedia. This is a milestone for me. I wnat to be a contributor with a well established organization i.e. Wikipedia. I am researching and writing on topics to showcase my ability.Can you please help me in achieving the same?

Yours Sincerely Preshtha

 

Hello Preshtha Kalsyan. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Prysm, Inc., gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Preshtha Kalsyan. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Preshtha Kalsyan|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:27, 14 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prysm, Inc. (September 15)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 13:36, 15 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prysm, Inc. (October 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 10:51, 9 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prysm, Inc. (October 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CNMall41 (talk) 19:01, 17 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

October 2020

edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Draft:Prysm, Inc.—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 11:34, 29 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sandiip Kapur (November 1)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dee03 were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dee03 20:29, 1 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sandiip Kapur (January 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jupitus Smart was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Jupitus Smart 16:02, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prysm, Inc. (January 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by SL93 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
SL93 (talk) 02:15, 23 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Sandiip Kapur

edit

  Hello, Preshtha Kalsyan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sandiip Kapur, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 5 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Prysm, Inc.

edit

  Hello, Preshtha Kalsyan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Prysm, Inc., a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 25 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Sandiip Kapur

edit
 

Hello, Preshtha Kalsyan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sandiip Kapur".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Eternal Shadow Talk 17:34, 3 July 2021 (UTC)Reply