Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 September 7

Help desk
< September 6 << Aug | September | Oct >> September 8 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


September 7 edit

00:35:20, 7 September 2018 review of draft by Xaviertherapper edit


Xaviertherapper (talk) 00:35, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I added a online music feature

12:32:15, 7 September 2018 review of submission by Naresh Yadav Ateli edit


Naresh Yadav Ateli (talk) 12:32, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

13:02:36, 7 September 2018 review of submission by Joe Rockefeller edit

there is a federal ethical investigation of the name utilized as the information provided by me is the proven fact I know. Joe Rockefeller (talk) 13:02, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  Hello. It appears that your submission to Articles for Creation was declined because it lacked reliable sources. Please note that Wikipedia requires third-party, independent sources for an article to be considered notable enough for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you need further help on what sources could be considered reliable, please visit the help desk. Thank you. —AE (talkcontributions) 02:31, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

14:23:27, 7 September 2018 review of draft by Shadwell Basin edit


Shadwell Basin (talk) 14:23, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To: Nosebagbear, Gbawden, Cassiopeia, Worldbruce,

    Thank you all for your help and advice while trying to write the above. I'm most grateful.
    The article is now waiting review in due course and I hope meets Wiki style and requirements,  
    though still struggling to find three page numbers for newspaper articles cited.
                                                                             Many thanks
                                                                             Shadwell Basin

17:38:46, 7 September 2018 review of draft by Abdulelah1 edit


Abdulelah1 (talk) 17:38, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My Fruiticulture submission was rejected because the reviewer wrote "Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Pomology instead."

Fruiticulture is a new term. Times are changing and advances are being made in agriculture. Pomology is not synonymous with the new term Fruiticulture. The emerging term Fruiticulture means "a form of vegan permaculture agroforestry that focuses on fruit growing. This is not exactly Pomomology. Please allow the advancement of the lexicon by allowing this new definition of Fruiticulture.

Respectfully,

Abdulelah

Hi Abdulelah1. The redirect from fruiticulture to pomology was created in 2011, so it isn't a completely new term. However old it is, it may still be too new to justify a stand alone article. Wikipedia is, by design, a trailing source. It doesn't cover topics until they've received significant attention from the world at large. Only one of the draft's twelve sources mentions the term, and it may not be a reliable source. You can open a discussion at Talk:Pomology, or one of the WikiProjects listed there, about whether fruiticulture should be covered in a separate article, but they'll expect you to show significantly better sources about fruiticulture than what's in the draft. --Worldbruce (talk) 05:11, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

17:56:19, 7 September 2018 review of draft by Mythbusterbuilding1 edit


Mythbusterbuilding1 (talk) 17:56, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I have submitted my first article, I want to make sure that it is in guideline. There are a lot of requirements, how can I get my article published without any errors on Wikipedia?

Hi Mythbusterbuilding1. Wikipedia:There is no deadline, so practice, practice, practice. I, for instance, spent six years making about 1,500 edits to existing articles before creating one. By then I understood which topics were suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia and which weren't. --Worldbruce (talk) 04:43, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

21:23:17, 7 September 2018 review of submission by Demographichistorian edit


I was wondering which statements where made on the article : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Greek_atrocities_in_Macedonia_and_Thrace

please inform me so I can either remove these statements or provide citations .

Demographichistorian (talk) 21:23, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]