Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 August 5

August 5

Template:Silvertide

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 21:31, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

• Template:Silvertide (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Too little content for a navbox, all interlinked (they have one album!) ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:49, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:55, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. SWinxy (talk) 19:11, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Delete only content is a two links and two redirects. Barely notable band that hasn’t done much, doesn’t need a navbox for the tiny amount of content related to them.. Dronebogus (talk) 15:18, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:47, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sign date

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:5~. Izno (talk) 21:31, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

• Template:Sign date (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, has never been used anywhere [1]. I can't see any situations in which writing {{subst:Sign date}} would be better than writing ~~~~~. This template also has a really daft implementation for no good reason, taking a single tide and feeding it through a substitution of a 5x template. 192.76.8.66 (talk) 18:52, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

Go ahead, delete it. I don't really care. Good point about it not really being used anywhere Prahlad balaji (talk) 03:09, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Delete per nom. – Michael Aurel (talk) 13:07, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Redirect to Template:5~, which does the same thing. The fact that the creator couldn't find Template:5~ and used this name suggests that a redirect would be helpful. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:55, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

• Redirect per Pppery. SWinxy (talk) 19:11, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
• Delete/Redirect per nomination and Pppery. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:47, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

RfARecents

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 21:32, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

• Template:RfARecentA (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:RfARecentB (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused templates that mimic Template:Recent RfX. (Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Recent/Base, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Recent/BaseA, and Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Recent/BaseB redirect to them.) SWinxy (talk) 04:51, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

• Delete Apparent failed tests/proposals from 2014. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:55, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:47, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).