Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 August 4

August 4

Template:Chairman of Japan-Turkey Society

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 13:58, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

• Template:Chairman of Japan-Turkey Society (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No mainspace article. Only used on the main bilateral relations article for Japan–Turkey relations. Not much exists on the web about this organization. Certainly, not a level that warrants its own navbox. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:56, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 17:37, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Izno (talk) 05:11, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Article wizard/bioskeleton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 21:33, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

• Template:Article wizard/bioskeleton (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions or documentation. Proposed in 2011, but apparently never adopted. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:04, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

• Comment I had forgotten I had created this. -- llywrch (talk) 05:34, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:49, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
• Comment it's a substitution template, so it will never have translcusions, as it provides a skeleton to start an article. -- 67.70.25.80 (talk) 22:28, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:05, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

• Delete Doesn't seem to be used as a preload anywhere either * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:54, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2008 in Canadian soccer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Izno (talk) 21:33, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

• Template:2008 in Canadian soccer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox with no transclusions or main article. If anyone is planning on creating the main article, in parallel with other articles in Category:Seasons in Canadian soccer, this could be userfied until then. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:02, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

• Keep Added to one relevant article linked in navbox. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:49, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:05, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

• Keep, this now has three transclusion and is part of a series. BLAIXX 21:20, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tv show

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Liz (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:17, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

• Template:Tv show (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

There is already a Template:Infobox television. Gonnym (talk) 07:10, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Can i redirect the page? •Cyberwolf• 13:58, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

• Delete. Not a reasonable name for a redirect to an infobox. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:35, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
• Delete' Broken template, not a plausible redirect title. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:54, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mitragyna speciosa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 13:58, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

• Template:Mitragyna speciosa (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox with one transclusion and many redlinks. The only transclusion is kratom which has recently been split from Mitragyna speciosa. I suggest deleting this template. The links are chemical compounds found in kratom/Mitragyna speciosa. If the template is kept, it should be renamed in some way: "Chemicals in kratom" "Phytochemistry of Mitragyna speciosa, or something else. Plantdrew (talk) 03:56, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

• Keep Still meets the rule of thumb for navigation for the number of links despite one use. Renaming is not of concern of this Tfd unless it's a merger discussion which this isn't. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:46, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Delete. If we break down chemical compounds found in all plants and add these to navboxes, we will have an insane amount of navboxes. If these are notable for this specific plant unlike in other plants, that is a different thing, but I see no evidence of that. As such this navbox is basically one valid link. Gonnym (talk) 08:42, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

• Delete per Gonnym. Let's not repeat the sins of the sports navboxes here. Izno (talk) 05:10, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).