Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 April 3

April 3 edit

Template:Alban Way gallery edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:47, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Only used in 2 articles where it can just be inserted as a gallery. But more importantly, those 2 articles don't need this gallery as per WP:IG; there already is Category:Alban Way at Commons. P 1 9 9   23:20, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete As per the nomination, there is no such important usage of the Template.
Tojoroy20 (talk) 15:37, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:UC Santa Barbara Gauchos rivalries navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:49, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to {{UC Santa Barbara Gauchos men's soccer navbox}} and {{UC Santa Barbara Gauchos men's basketball navbox}}, both of which list links to these rivalries. Not especially helpful for navigation, only serves to clutter pages (WP:NENAN). fuzzy510 (talk) 22:55, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Temple Owls rivalries navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:53, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to {{Temple Owls football navbox}} and {{Temple Owls men's basketball navbox}}, both of which list all of the links to these rivalries. This navbox only serves to clutter its representative pages so that people searching about Temple basketball rivalries can quickly look at Temple football rivalries. fuzzy510 (talk) 22:50, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Penn Quakers rivalries navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:57, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to {{Penn Quakers football navbox}} and {{Penn Quakers men's basketball navbox}}, both of which list links to these rivalries. This navbox only serves to clutter its representative pages so that people searching about Penn basketball rivalries can quickly look at Penn football rivalries. (And it is clutter - Philadelphia Big 5 features an incredible 14 navboxes at this time) fuzzy510 (talk) 22:47, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, redundant. I had taken a break from Wikipedia and navboxes seem to have exploded all over the place since to the point there is too much to use it for navigation on many articles (like this one). CRwikiCA talk 13:21, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:52, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Decade in ice hockey category header edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:45, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused after replaced with {{YYY0s in sport category header}}. –Aidan721 (talk) 22:27, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment {{YYY0s in sport category header}} is not documented. Are there also other sport-specific templates that should be added to this discussion? CRwikiCA talk 13:19, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete now that the generic template is documented. Combining everything in a single simple to maintain template is a way better way to implement this. CRwikiCA talk 13:45, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:52, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Anglo-Saxon time edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 April 11. Izno (talk) 00:49, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:S-line/DB-IC left/17 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:44, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused s-line templates. Gonnym (talk) 12:30, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Auckland Steel roster edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:37, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused after both articles for these teams were redirected to New Zealand Women's Ice Hockey League for not enough in-depth coverage. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:59, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete unused CRwikiCA talk 21:13, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Give me some time to work out a new solution to use the template. The page was deleted so I am working on updating the league page in order to include this template into that. Volrath2002 (talk) 22:39, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Both now used in New Zealand Women's Ice Hockey League. Thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 03:48, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Subst and delete there is currently one usage of this template, and so it can be substed. Template space is for where content is needed in multiple places, which isn't the case here. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:07, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete until such time as either of these teams have their own article. Jay D. Easy (t) 17:26, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete both. Not used and unlikely to be useful for some time. Ajf773 (talk) 09:37, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).