Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 October 23

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< October 22 October 24 >

October 23 edit

Template:Lesotho general election, 2017 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 21:55, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and same chart is on the Lesotho general election, 2017 article. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:37, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Realms of Elizabeth II edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 21:56, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what this is trying to do but the same links to the monarchies articles are already used on Template:Elizabeth II. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:33, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ottawa Senators Header edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 21:56, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unneeded header which just links to the main article, talk page, and talk page archives from 2005 to 2008. Links to the archived discussions are already on the talk page and the article and talk page can be reached by clicking at the top left of the page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:31, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hungarian Governments since 1990 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 21:56, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Same list is featured on Template:Hungarian Governments. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:22, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Family tree of Faisal of Saudi Arabia edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:34, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused tree chart. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:18, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Envoy merger tree edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per author request. ✗plicit 01:36, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The same chart is on the Envoy Air article within the article space. This isn't needed anymore. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:17, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As the initial creator of the template, I agree. It’s no longer useful. Delete. --RickyCourtney (talk) 19:19, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Asian Games Esports edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 October 30. Izno (talk) 21:57, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Esports at the 2018 Asian Games edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:33, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No links or transclusions. Nothing but a list of games played at the event. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:15, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Enlargement of the European Union SMIL.svg edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:32, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused map. Not necessary to have a map in template space. Map is already transcluded on two related EU articles. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:14, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fine by me, cmɢʟee⎆τaʟκ 22:01, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Los Angeles Wildcats staff edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 21:57, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use. Substitute on LA Wildcats article. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:13, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Dallas Renegades roster edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was moved. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 15:24, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No longer used or needed as the team is now the Arlington Renegades. Template:Arlington Renegades roster is going to be the template used in its place. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:12, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Move to {{Arlington Renegades roster}} instead. The template creator has been asked to move pages to preserve the page history. I have tagged the move target for speedy deletion to make this move possible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonesey95 (talk • contribs) 16:34, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment As an admin patrolling CSD categories, I'm reluctant to move a page in the midst of a deletion discussion. Can this be closed first with a decision to move this template? Liz Read! Talk! 23:06, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • moved to new title. Frietjes (talk) 15:23, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Collage Lebanese Maronite Politicians edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 21:58, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused collage of images. Template space isn't necessary for this. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:10, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Clubs (Spanish card suit) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 21:58, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:10, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ballon d'Or striker of the year edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:03, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Only one link to the same player twice. Fails NENAN. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:09, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

and how many links do you want to be satisfied?
https://www.marca.com/en/football/2022/10/17/634dbd2d22601dd8288b45aa.html
https://www.90min.com/posts/ballon-d-or-2022-robert-lewandowski-wins-muller-trophy
https://www.google.com/search?q=lewandowski+ballon+d%27or+2022&rlz=1C5CHFA_enPL966PL966&oq=lewandowski+balon&aqs=chrome.2.69i57j0i10i512l5j0i10i22i30l2j0i22i30l2.4870j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#:~:text=Ballon%20d%27Or%202022%3A%20Fans,givemesport.com%20%E2%80%BA%20880...
https://www.vanguardngr.com/2022/10/2022-ballon-dor-winners-full-list-mane-benzema-putellas-lewandowski-others/
https://en.as.com/soccer/ballon-dor-2022-live-online-today-awards-nominees-winners-and-latest-updates-from-the-ceremony-n/
https://www.sportingnews.com/uk/soccer/news/ballon-dor-live-results-winners-rankings-awards-benzema-2022/bieyhgyuifdmvchg6fqtctbj
https://fcbayern.com/en/news/2021/11/ballon-dor-2021/lewandowski-wins-striker-of-the-year-at-ballon-dor-awards
https://www.sportingnews.com/us/soccer/news/lionel-messi-2021-ballon-dor-robert-lewandowski-snub/1bqiba9scxbzt1np4tgonesm7e
https://www.marca.com/en/football/2022/10/17/634dbd2d22601dd8288b45aa.html
https://www.marca.com/en/football/international-football/2021/12/06/61ae90de268e3edb728b4590.html
are you satisfied with the moderator?
please do not delete the template. Eemiratess (talk) 08:03, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The nominator meant to link to WP:NENAN as a rationale for deletion, specifically the "rule of five" described there. That is the sort of linking that is meant here. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:17, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
more than one source was missing, then what is the problem next? Eemiratess (talk) 19:01, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Links mean article links within the template. This isn't about the article. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:33, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I dont understand you Eemiratess (talk) 08:22, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 20:45, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - not needed, both due to lack of navigation links, and simply lack of notability. {{Ballon d'Or recipients}} sufficient. GiantSnowman 20:47, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete provides no useful navigation. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:14, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Ballon d'Or striker of the year and Keep Gerd Müller Trophy If a player has won twice, it does not mean that the template is problematic! the 2nd one (Gerd Müller Trophy) is more comprehensive and more complete. it is needed for main article Gerd Müller Trophy. to prevent rework in future keep it. it doesn't against any policy and it doesn't take space for maintenance too!--Miha2020 (talk) 06:34, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
it's new and important award. it must be separate from main template. what is different between these templates? Template:Kopa Trophy

Template:Yashin Trophy and new one Template:Gerd Müller Trophy? please see history of them! they have been created when they have one name was in it! here and here then improved after 6 months or more. for informal award of france football we have this Template:Ballon d'Or Additional Awards But don't we have a template for the official award?--Miha2020 (talk) 06:47, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete both as neither has enough links to justify a template. One of them can maybe be created when, and only when, there are 4-5 different winners. The point of templates is for navigation, and neither of these templates currently serve this purpose. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:32, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Automotive industry in Honduras edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 October 30. Izno (talk) 21:58, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Aiginiakos F.C. squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:24, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated navbox. Any updates won't have any links as the current roster won't have notability for articles to be created. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:00, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as none of the team's current players look notable, and so this template does not serve any navigational purpose. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:44, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 20:45, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - not needed. GiantSnowman 20:46, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Aiginiakos F.C. edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 21:58, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Only link is the title. Fails navigation. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:58, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tampa Bay Vipers roster edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was history merge. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:16, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No longer used as the Vipers have since changed names. Template:Orlando Guardians roster has been created in its place. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:54, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Move to the new location to preserve page history. This template should have been moved. The creating editor has been notified that they should move pages instead of recreating them. I have tagged the move target for speedy deletion. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:09, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move to the new location to preserve page history. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:10, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • A move is not possible here. Please review the actual page histories. --Izno (talk) 22:00, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Okhighways edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:35, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template is for citing a fansite which is odd because thats something we should almost never do... As such this template serves no purpose and should be deleted. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 15:13, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Subst and delete I very much disagree with the nominator's modus operandi of knee-jerk removing everything uncited or cited to a SPS. That being said, having a template makes it sound like using this site is something that we actively encourage, which we do not. --Rschen7754 19:16, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thats only my MO on BLP pages and just FYI thats actually required of all of us... "Contentious material about living persons (or, in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—must be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion." Horse Eye's Back (talk) 14:52, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Highly doubt this source is being used on BLPs... and also doubt anyone would have an objection to removal in those cases. Elli (talk | contribs) 17:28, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Elli you never know. Highways are contentious these days. –Fredddie™ 22:17, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst and delete - Should not have a reference template for a WP:SPS. Dough4872 21:32, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst and delete per Rschen7754. –Fredddie™ 15:34, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Country data Bucharest edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:00, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hoax. See c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Flags of Bucharest for an explanation Strainu (talk) 14:18, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:39, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment that linked request did not unambiguously conclude it was a hoax.... Joseph2302 (talk) 20:12, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Joseph2302, you are technically correct, but WP:V and more specifically WP:REDFLAG should be more important for inclusion in articles via this template. Strainu (talk) 21:34, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Romeo and Juliet edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 04:42, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Romeo and Juliet with Template:Romeo and Juliet film adaptations.
I stumbled upon Template:Romeo and Juliet film adaptations and realized it was split from Template:Romeo and Juliet without any consensus. I think a better solution for the size issue of this template is to have collapsible sections of a unified template. TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 00:55, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, it is just not size alone, but the number of links. The Film adaptations is a topic large enough to deserve a separate navbox.
LoЯd ۞pεth 19:53, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: MOS:COLLAPSE suggests clearly that any other option would be preferable to collapsing sections of a navbox, and as Lord Opeth said this topic is large enough to deserve to be separate so the current setup is the best solution. QuietHere (talk) 18:17, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_October_23&oldid=1119991630"