Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 October 30

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< October 29 October 31 >

October 30 edit

Template:Automotive industry in Honduras edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 07:20, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No main articles and no links except to broad subject-related articles. Nothing specific to the subject for the navbox. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:06, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep These complete a set of templates and have data not shown elsewhere. Trigenibinion (talk) 18:47, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That has no relevance. You don't have the minimum of five links with articles that are directly related to the subject matter. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:56, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Paraguay does. The articles are missing. And the others also show needed articles. Trigenibinion (talk) 12:30, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Navboxes should be not be created to highlight a need to create articles. The articles exist for a navbox to connect them beforehand. Not after. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:46, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 21:58, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all no relevant blue links in any of these templates, just red links and generic blue links to associated topics. If the red linked articles are actually notable, create those articles first, and then and only then should this template be re-created. The purpose of a template is to link between articles on the same topic- this template does not currently do that. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:24, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Precisely, the template provides a guide of the articles that are needed for other people to create. Trigenibinion (talk) 23:44, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    That's not what I said, and not the purpose of templates. Templates are for linking/navigating between articles that exist, not for suggesting articles to create. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:48, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all; I'm not sure the creator understands why redlinks don't usually prompt people to create articles. Meanwhile, these are not yet useful. Her Pegship (?) 23:01, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Asian Games Esports edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 07:20, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Two links and no mainspace article. For now, the events at the Asian Games navboxes for 2018 and 2022 should be used for transclusions to the respective articles. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:16, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep the main article Esports at the Asian Games will be created soon. in fact it should be created by now. and another page List of Asian Games medalists in esports will be added to the template too. so it will be 4 links soon. even if it will get deleted, it will be recreated in few months, I see no points in deleting it now. Sports2021 (talk) 00:34, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It either was going to be created before the creation of the navbox or a little bit after the navbox was created. Either way, this still has no merit in staying since we don't know how "soon" the two more links are going to come around. And if that article is going to be deleted than to be recreated, it probably means the article is not notable. If there is going to be a back and forth, then having the navbox becomes redundant since articles are supposed to be there for navbox to transclude through. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:54, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Who says the main article is going to be deleted? I don't know where that came from. I was talking about this template and its deletion. Sports2021 (talk) 00:08, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete it has 2 links, which is not enough, even if the main article for the topic is created. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:08, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe you should count again, it's already 2, will be 3 with that one. Sports2021 (talk) 00:08, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It has 2 blue links- and that is not enough. What is not clear about that? Joseph2302 (talk) 15:24, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 21:57, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Not enough links to warrant a navbox. Even if the main article gets created, it will presumably link to both years in another way, and the two years already link to each other and will presumably link to the parent another way, so a navbox serves no purpose. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:41, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Teleiodini-stub edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was wrong venue. Categories with stub templates are discussed at WP:CFD, moving there ... Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:58, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All former members of this tribe have been moved to Litini. YorkshireExpat (talk) 21:01, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Block, Inc./doc edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:56, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unneeded doc page for a navbox that is really small at the moment. I removed it for that reason. There is nothing that requires at doc page for transcluding categories on another page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:59, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I need to ask @WikiCleanerMan. Are you talking about the Document Page or just the template as a whole? I know the navbox page should be kept in my view. I'm still making a consideration if the document page for the template would be deleted or it rather be merged but I'm feeling concern of having it deleted. 20chances (talk) 19:29, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The doc page should be deleted. The doc page being deleted doesn't affect the overall template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:50, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, now I see. At least the Template itself isn't going to be deleted, and that's a good thing. But like I said, I don't know if the doc page itself should be deleted at this time. 20chances (talk) 00:12, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I also must mention, I had no clue why this page was made in the first place. 20chances (talk) 00:17, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You probably either created it as a test or you thought since navboxes do have a doc page that it was necessary. You didn't have a bad intention, but the navbox is still small at this point in time making such a page not necessary. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:13, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Harmless, and isn't eligible for {{Db-subpage}} which is the only real case I can see such pages being validly deleted. Steel1943 (talk) 21:22, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:41, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Leaning Merge into Template Page, while I am fine having this page kept, merging it is fine but even if its purpose is to guide users to it, it has the right to be kept for it's purpose. 20chances (talk) 00:44, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cafa women's futsal tournament group edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Looks like it was meant for 2022 CAFA Women's Futsal Championship, but there are already tables in that article. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:55, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, incoming links, or categories. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:46, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Northern Zhejiang transit edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 November 6. ✗plicit 11:04, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_October_30&oldid=1120358919"