Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 November 21

November 21 edit

Template:NYCS station edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:45, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/New York City Subway. Cards84664 23:06, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. – Epicgenius (talk) 20:51, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ATP Masters Series edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:47, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to {{ATP Masters tournaments}}. Qwerty284651 (talk) 18:33, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Wrugbybox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:25, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

redundant to Template:rugbybox. after the deletion of Template:Wrcode, the "code" and "test#" parameters are not needed. Frietjes (talk) 17:47, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@PeeJay, Rugbyfan22, and Bcp67: who participated in the wrcode discussion. Frietjes (talk) 17:49, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Per nom. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 17:57, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge and redirect to {{rugbybox}} - Deleting this template would remove a lot of content from women’s rugby union articles. It’s imperative that we not delete this template until we can work out how it would affect the hundreds of pages it appears on. Otherwise, I support the premise of this nomination. – PeeJay 23:11, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per PeeJay. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:07, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @PeeJay and WikiCleanerMan: what is there to merge? the discussion for Template:Wrcode concluded that the |code= and |test#= parameters were superfluous. so what is there to merge? Frietjes (talk) 01:00, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    If the template code is the same as {{rugbybox}} aside from the parameters you mentioned, then fine, just redirect this template to {{rugbybox}} and have done with it. – PeeJay 12:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Quando Rondo edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:48, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:NENAN, three links is still less than the five customarily required targets. Was already deleted following this discussion. Muhandes (talk) 17:06, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox route diagram edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 03:13, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete and no longer in use. All remaining links to this template are discussions or index listings. Useddenim (talk) 00:39, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).