Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 November 17

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< November 16 November 18 >

November 17 edit

Template:Current U.S. senators from Alabama edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per prior TfD Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:05, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All are single-use and should be substituted on respective articles. Based on previous discussions of unused templates like these on July 12 and November 6 these tables should not be on a separate template space since this violates the policy on article content being transcluding through template space. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:58, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as creator. It is a whole set of templates, now that the rest are deleted, these may also be deleted along with its category. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 13:37, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rdconfigarray edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:28, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Last usage of Template:Rdconfigarray outside of (abandoned) sandboxes was removed in Special:Diff/1121133052. —⁠andrybak (talk) 17:49, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Reference desk/header/deskopts should be deleted as well – it is directly used only in Template:Rdconfigarray. This is a follow up to Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Obsolete Reference desk subpages. —⁠andrybak (talk) 17:51, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:57, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Soroban diagram edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:39, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions except in one editor's sandbox. Created in 2013. At Soroban, images appear to be used without any trouble. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:54, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:People from Biratnagar edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:39, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox that is really a category. There is no inherent connection among these people. Remove from affected articles after ensuring that Category:People from Biratnagar is applied to each one, if appropriate. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:51, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:OA journal edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:59, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions in article space. No documentation or categories. Created in 2013, does not appear to have been adopted. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:47, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:MotR edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:47, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template proposed in 2019 for a very specific use, but not adopted. Also, it has 16(!) unnamed parameters, which is a recipe for disaster. Subst and delete, or userfy. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:45, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Class/data edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:44, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, superseded by Module:Class/definition.json * Pppery * it has begun... 16:26, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:MoB edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:34, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions in article space. This appears to be an experiment proposed in 2009 but never adopted. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:12, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Argentina men's rugby sevens squad 2020 Summer Olympics edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:33, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused squad navbox and a non-winning team. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:53, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Date style edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:32, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. This was an ambitious proposal from 2008 for automatic date formatting of wikilinked dates via reader preferences, both of which have been rejected. CS1 citation templates have since adopted the use of {{use dmy dates}} to format citation template dates. This template can be substed and deleted. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:47, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hawthorn best and fairest (AFL Women's) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 November 24. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:30, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Oregon law schools edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:31, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No main article, and there are not enough schools to satisfy the generally accepted practice at WP:NENAN. The state of Oregon has only three law schools. A category is sufficient. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:23, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Soon to be part of a larger navbox for the Oregon judicial system.Mtsmallwood (talk) 06:40, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Mtsmallwood, see Template:Navbox#Subgroups example for how to create subgroups in a navbox. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:15, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_November_17&oldid=1123766308"