Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 January 15

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< January 14 January 16 >

January 15 edit

Template:PL showcase picture edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:05, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Per Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 January 14#Template:PL showcase article. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:11, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pl-sa edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:25, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Per Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 August 11#Articles featured on portals templates * Pppery * it has begun... 23:11, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Nonblocked edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:08, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't appear to be used anymore. Izno (talk) 19:09, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject Manager edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. czar 19:54, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no incoming links. User:GKFXtalk 18:33, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Seems to have been used at one time to tag someone as the "WikiProject Manager" of a WikiProject ([1]). Not aware we have such a concept. Nor Project Coordinator.({{Coordinator}}). Nigej (talk) 20:51, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Was previously used to improve structure in WP:FOOD but is no longer used nor will be used in the future. Removal of both templates is suggested. asoundd 08:01, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:VE Bug/bug template edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 20:04, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Templates to track VE bugs. No longer in use, and new bugs should go to Phabricator anyway. User:GKFXtalk 18:28, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment (as the template creator) - wouldn't delete them mess up with archives and pages where it's been used? (this is just a recent example, I wonder if the archives would be unreadable afterwards.) --Elitre (WMF) (talk) 12:00, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    The templates nominated are not used on any pages, including the one you linked. The parent template {{VE Bug2}} isn’t nominated for deletion, only the subtemplates. User:GKFXtalk 17:58, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    To be honest, if Template:VE Bug should no longer be used, then those 4 usages should be subst and then the template deleted. Gonnym (talk) 11:28, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SharedProxyIP edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 21:27, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure there's a reasonable replacement for this template used only a half dozen times using standard style. Izno (talk) 18:25, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I think this may be used as a subst-only template. I find hundreds of instances of text that is similar to the text in this template, but no other template that seems to match it. The history says that it was created as a fork of {{Shared IP}}, which now uses different language. It may be possible to merge this template's wording into {{Shared IP}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:37, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well, proxies are blocked when we see them, so I think that's probably the interesting template, but either way, pretty sure these kinds of templates are not substed anymore. Izno (talk) 21:25, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, although it appears as though this has been substituted in the past (User talk:162.93.199.1) I couldn't find any places where it was recently substituted. Adding a |proxy=y option to {{Shared IP}} should be sufficient if an alternate version is needed. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:49, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rewrite-talk edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:30, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Used in 3 places and only one of them has an actual link. Suggest full delete rather than substing +- adding a comment on the one page that actually has a link. Izno (talk) 18:07, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... and in the one place that does have an actual link, it's no longer being discussed as it was last edited in 2012. Just delete without substing everywhere. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:11, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Article history/old edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:10, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copy of old version of {{article history}}. The edit history of "Article history" is still available so there is no need for a second copy. User:GKFXtalk 16:11, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Today (ymd) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:11, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template to format today's date in a style not accepted by MOS:DATE. User:GKFXtalk 16:04, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Something like {{YYYYMMDD}} does look potentially useful, but not this one. Nigej (talk) 19:26, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tuna-cladogram edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:12, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article content duplicated into a template (content is in the subtemplate Template:Tuna-cladogram/Thunnini). User:GKFXtalk 16:01, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ubay edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:17, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 16:00, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment I see that the template is unused because you've WP:BOLDLY deleted all the articles, turning them into redirects. Might be worth waiting a little while to see if anyone makes a fuss. Nigej (talk) 18:38, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Nigej: this is because the barangays (administrative villages) of this Philippine town lack notability. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:56, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      • I agree, but there's the much quoted WP:GEOLAND and there's been various discussions about the notability of Turkish villages recently. Nigej (talk) 17:47, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. The seven days this discussion will be open for serves as a long enough little while. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:11, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tagbilaran edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:17, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 15:59, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment I see that the template is unused because you've WP:BOLDLY deleted all the articles, turning them into redirects. Might be worth waiting a little while to see if anyone makes a fuss. Nigej (talk) 18:39, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. The seven days this discussion will be open for serves as a long enough little while. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:11, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:W-contributing edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:39, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused welcome template. User:GKFXtalk 15:54, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WP Grey's task force cat edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:38, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to have been replaced by {{WikiProject Television task force main category|Grey's Anatomy}}. User:GKFXtalk 15:52, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. The WikiProject Television/Grey's Anatomy task force is inactive since 2013. Perhaps we can remove {{WLCMGA}} at some point too. Nigej (talk) 19:33, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    and {{WP-Grey'sAnatomy}} too. Nigej (talk) 19:34, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Welcome-caps edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:27, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome template last used 2006 which criticises the new user's name. User:GKFXtalk 15:51, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ambox/core edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:14, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

These leftover relics from the pre-Lua conversion should be replaced with the non-core template and deleted. Gonnym (talk) 13:02, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. User:GKFXtalk 15:55, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Round/e− edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was move to subpages of template:rndnear Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:17, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sub templates of Template:Round (other than in 1 talk page). Gonnym (talk) 12:18, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (was about to nominate them myself). User:GKFXtalk 12:19, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Gonnym and User:GKFX, were you aware that it is used in Template:Rndnear? Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:42, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No. It would seem that until your addition to the example in the /doc it didn't appear as used. Withdrawn then (though still surprised that it isn't used at all). Gonnym (talk) 13:50, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Move to rndnear/* rather than withdraw, I think? User:GKFXtalk 13:51, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Gonnym and User:GKFX, I just removed Template:Rndnear from Template:Cyclone wind converter (metric), so maybe move it to a subpage of rndnear/ and/or nominate rndnear? 13:57, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'll nominate rndnear. Gonnym (talk) 14:09, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Roadlink edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 January 22. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:37, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Plans/Preload edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:39, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Preload template from 2012 that doesn't seem useful, as a preload template will only let you create a new page with the given content but {{plans}} looks like it would go on an existing userpage. User:GKFXtalk 11:48, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:On Wikipedia edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:39, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused hatnote template, unclear what its intended use is. User:GKFXtalk 11:45, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I think the intention was to standardize the formatting of self-referential hatnotes, but anyway it didn't catch on and should be deleted. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:11, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Per above. As noted, didn't catch on. Nigej (talk) 07:19, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Iron Fire edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:28, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All the album articles have been redirected. Sikonmina (talk) 09:28, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete No longer useful. Nigej (talk) 18:05, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rndfrac edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:27, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused maths template to round a decimal to a fraction given a denominator. User:GKFXtalk 09:09, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sacrifice edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:25, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All the album links have been redirected. Sikonmina (talk) 07:09, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete No longer useful. Nigej (talk) 18:04, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Thesis author edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:24, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links. People are using much better templates like {{cite thesis}}, even for external links and bibliography sections. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:27, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ACE discussion edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:ACE discussion. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:23, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:ACE2021 discussion with Template:ACE discussion.
I recently created a generic ACE discussion template to support ACE discussions, but would like to go through the TFD process as the calling locations would probably need to be replaced/change. And separately, the new template could probably use auto-detection of the year (but I still haven't figured out string.gsub). Izno (talk) 06:03, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: It would probably help if you showed {{ACE discussion}} in use somewhere so that we can get a sense of how this transition might work. The new template currently has zero transclusions, so it's hard to know if it is a valid replacement. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:31, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    It will probably need a little evolution, but this was what was needed. As I said, it could use year auto-detection, but for modern versions of all these ACE discussion templates, it should be close to drop in. Izno (talk) 06:33, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    That looks reasonable; for some reason when I tried it, it looked different and I couldn't make it work. Support merge. Let's snow close this thing and move on. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:27, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I couldn't make it work by having the intermediary template, but as you can see had no issue with direct transclusion. I'm sure there's a way to do that, but I didn't want to deal with it. :) Izno (talk) 17:49, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strongly support. As a template editor, and as someone who had to deal with this mess of templates as a member of the ElectCom for ACE a few years back, there is zero reason to have a new template for every year - simply having the year be a parameter is more than good enough. When I was on ElectCom that was one of my goals after the election finished but sadly I got distracted by other things and it never happened. Primefac (talk) 09:14, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. I've added the automatic year detection you wanted by using {{#invoke:String|match|PAGENAME|%d%d%d%d}}. So if all the titles this is used on use a 4 digit year number in their title, it will find them. Gonnym (talk) 10:35, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy sure @Izno: Think it is safe to say that the only people that are going to care about the mechanics of this template aren't going to care about getting it improved, and the transclusion count on these very low. — xaosflux Talk 11:39, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Show file signature edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 January 22. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:38, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Spitting Image (2020) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 05:24, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Navbox with no main article. If this navbox contained every possible name that fit its title, it would simply be a laundry list of hundreds of famous people from the 2020s. I don't think this navbox is useful. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:23, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. User:GKFXtalk 12:26, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. There's a list at Spitting Image. A navbox adds nothing. Nigej (talk) 17:29, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sport players edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 05:21, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. If you look at the targets of the articles, they are mostly WP:EGG violations. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:21, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Random list of sports. Confusingly nearly everything links to a sport not sport players. Nigej (talk) 17:18, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Speedway Rider edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 05:21, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, incoming links, documentation, or categories. Appears to be an abandoned project. Only substantive edits were in 2008. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:20, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Some overly complicated idea for a team roster, no longer used. See this Team roster from 2008. Nigej (talk) 17:25, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:South Coast AFL edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 05:21, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Navbox with only one link to an actual article about a football club (the other working link goes to an article about a naval college). – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:19, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Regional league with nothing like enough content to need a navbox. Nigej (talk) 17:32, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Small Faces tracks edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 05:21, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Content exists in a more comprehensive form at Small Faces (1967 album), which is the only place for this content. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:16, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. User:GKFXtalk 17:49, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Shute Shield teams edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 05:14, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or incoming links. This article content for Shute Shield already exists in a more comprehensive form within the article. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:14, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Article content that is already in the parent article. Nigej (talk) 17:35, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Shapsug families edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 05:14, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. This unsourced article content has been inserted into Shapsugs, which is probably the only place where it could be useful. No need for a template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:13, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Article content that is already in the obvious place for it go. Nigej (talk) 17:38, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Second language acquisition edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 05:13, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Like many unused sidebars, it appears to have been abandoned in favor of a navbox, in this case the more comprehensive {{SLA topics}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:11, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nm. Clearly superseded by the navbox noted. Nigej (talk) 17:39, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sd1 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 05:13, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or documentation. Appears to have been created as a demonstration in 2009 (See discussion) and then never used because it doesn't meet the need. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:09, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. User:GKFXtalk 15:56, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Schoolsfinder edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 05:13, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. URL points to a defunct domain. Functionality has been replaced by {{EduBase}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:04, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Superseded by the template noted. Nigej (talk) 17:40, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sciencefields edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:59, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, incoming links, documentation, or categories. This quasi-navbox from 2006 has been lost to time, apparently, and replaced by more modern equivalents such as {{Natural science}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:59, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. User:GKFXtalk 15:56, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I have only the vaguest memory of creating this template 16 years ago. No need to keep it around any longer when it's not being used. –Prototime (talk · contribs) 00:14, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SPBMETRO-bull-smallname edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:36, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or documentation. Created in 2012. Unlikely to be used since {{SPBMETRO-bull}}, also created in 2012, is used in only two articles. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:53, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. User:GKFXtalk 17:48, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SMRT Buses edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:17, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, incoming links, documentation, or categories. Content is just an image. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:48, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. User:GKFXtalk 15:55, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_January_15&oldid=1068934322"