Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 December 3

< December 2	December 4 >

December 3 edit

Template:Al-Jaish SC sections edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:11, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Al-Jaish SC sections (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Two links and both articles are linked in a sidebox on both articles. Duplication isn't necessary. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:57, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2008 Tibetan unrest edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 December 11. ✗plicit 23:42, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2008_Tibetan_unrest (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Royal Family of Württemberg edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:42, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Royal Family of Württemberg (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The template has less than 5 entries linked, which hinders its usefulness as a template. 98.228.137.44 (talk) 16:58, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:06, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Princely Family of Ligne edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:41, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Princely Family of Ligne (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The template has less than 5 entries linked, which hinders its usefulness as a template. 98.228.137.44 (talk) 16:50, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:06, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Marstime edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was move to userspace until it is used in articlespace Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 16:00, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Marstime (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Mars2020time (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Created a little over a year ago as an experiment. Used in one editor's test page; no other transclusions. Userfy or delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:55, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. If the creator requests userfying I have no objection, but I don't think we should do it preemptively. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:19, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Userfy can be done at any other time. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:11, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The pages were not created as an experiment, but to convert the times given by NASA as Mars local time to Earth time. At the page https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ingenuity_(helicopter)/Archive_1 there was a longer discussion about "date of 6th flight being May 23 UTC". Since NASA used JPL (=Califonia) local time and date and not saying it, there were lots of wrong secondary sources. I proposed to use my template in the talk page but without reaction. I did not pushed afterwards but converted the dates on my local page and copied the result in the article. --Schrauber5 (talk) 18:47, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep:- Please visit the flight table as List of Ingenuity flights all time of flight displayed here are converted LMST times using these templates. Since it makes the code bulkier we convert and directly place the time thereChinakpradhan (talk) 03:54, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 04:16, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe some information about the templates is helpful: the core is the factor between the lenght of day at Mars and Earth. Every mission on Mars has its own local timekeeping with zero set around the planned landing day. The Marstime parameters are a reference point in time given in local mission time and earth time. With that reference time a given local Mars time will be converted to earth time. The template Mars2020time uses Marstime and has a reference point for Mars 2020 included. For a new mission like Mars 2026 a new template could be created. --Schrauber5 (talk) 22:31, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as being the author. But I'm not very familiar with the templates deletion policy so I have no sound understanding of the pros and cons. If the outcome would be userfying I would then try to make the template public again and promote the usage at a next Mars mission. With the current mission the articles are settled and a backward introduction would not be helpful/accepted by the other authors. --Schrauber5 (talk) 22:31, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).