Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 December 2

December 2 edit

Template:AFJ edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:00, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template that does little more than add a wikilink, which is also outdated since it appears to actually be a redirect. Primefac (talk) 21:53, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NJ Hudson County Commissioners edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:42, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See the discussion [[1]], which resulted in the deletion of many other extremely similar templates. This is just another template that I discovered after the fact. TLDR, these are not templates, but rather lists that include zero links to any commissioners, or anything like that. PerpetuityGrat (talk) 19:07, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--PerpetuityGrat (talk) 19:11, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • The initial templates were deleted because editors didn't realize what was happening. Once editors came to understand the sheer senselessness of deleting these templates, they took action and stood up to the disruptive deletions, ones that continue to make the encyclopedia worse every single day. Consensus has changed, plain and simple. Alansohn (talk) 12:56, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).