Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 December 12

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< December 11 December 13 >

December 12 edit

Template:KET DTV edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:38, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No longer in use Mvcg66b3r (talk) 23:04, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:27, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete — was substed in the last page that used it, and two other pages no longer could use it due to changes in Louisville. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 03:07, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Species list/core edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:37, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No longer used, I believe replaced by Module:TaxonList everywhere. Izno (talk) 22:31, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:RLWC Infobox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 20:02, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pointless clone of Template:Infobox rugby league tour with very minor changes. Template was created by an editor who intends to use it on Rugby League World Cup squad pages (e.g. 1954 Rugby League World Cup squads), in contravention of a discussion at Template talk:Infobox rugby league tour where I pointed out that the template's use on those pages violates MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE (see discussion for justification). Furthermore, the template isn't even titled in accordance with WP template naming principles. – PeeJay 19:41, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - Concise summary of the tournament, displaying top-level information. Editor wishes for rugby league tours to have their own infobox and not use a rugby league one. This template meets the creators intention, and wording avoids confusing editors to think that is anything other than being an infobox for the Rugby League World Cup.Fleets (talk) 19:44, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • The page for the tournament squads does not need a "concise summary of the tournament". How are you not getting this? – PeeJay 19:46, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:27, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. –Aidan721 (talk) 03:27, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, non-standard and not needed. Frietjes (talk) 15:40, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

2018 Summer Youth Olympics futsal convenience templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:57, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

not needed after templates were merged with Futsal at the 2018 Summer Youth Olympics – Boys' tournament and Futsal at the 2018 Summer Youth Olympics – Girls' tournament. Frietjes (talk) 16:34, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thought I'd give you a headsup that B7 isn't tagged with the nomination. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:34, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Welcome (rounded cards) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:05, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Appears to be an abandoned experiment. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:50, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2012OlympicBadmintonSchedule edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 05:42, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Was missed in TfDs on December 5 for Olympic schedules. Single use, subst and delete. –Aidan721 (talk) 05:12, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2010 FIBA World Championship Group D edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:58, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Subst to respective group article and transclude section. –Aidan721 (talk) 01:36, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Oil Bowl Hall of Fame Inductees edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:59, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In mainspace, this is currently only being used at Oil Bowl (high school). I suggest to have this template substituted to Oil Bowl (high school) and then deleted. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:05, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. –Aidan721 (talk) 03:16, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - It doesn't seem likely that many name in the list would meet WP:N; low single digit, probably. I beg to suggest that the subject's inclusion in the Lebanon County (Pennsylvania) Women’s Hall of Fame does not, of itself, confer notability. That being the case, the template tends more towards spam - promotion for the HoF on whichever few articles eventualy take it - than towards navigation. --Tagishsimon (talk) 11:10, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:26, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lebanon County (Pennsylvania) Women’s Hall of Fame edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was moved to draft space. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:41, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are no bluelinks in this template. I also checked at Lebanon County (Pennsylvania) Women's Hall of Fame and they are all red. This template isn't needed as there are no articles to navigate. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:51, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if you've noticed, but this template, and the article are part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red. The project exists to turn Red links blue. But first they have to have the red links. This template and its article were created to support the work they do, to encourage articles about women of achievement in a given subject area and given geographical location. All red links for them are considered a work in progress. As anyone can see by looking at the article, all names are verified with sourcing. This deletion nomination is counter productive to what they are trying to achieve. — Maile (talk) 01:08, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The names are there at Lebanon County (Pennsylvania) Women's Hall of Fame. These names won't be removed from the article. This nomination is only for the deletion of the template, not the names in the article. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 02:31, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or draftify - Per our guideline on red links at WP:REDNOT, "Red links may be used in navboxes which also contain links to existing articles, but they cannot be excessive. Editors who add excessive red links to navboxes are expected to actively work on building those articles, or the links may be removed from the template." It would seem this template, by virtue of being entirely red links, violates this guideline. One project's or editor's goals can't simply run roughshod over project norms. Per WP:ATD-I, "Moving to user space is still preferred for templates that seem to serve a single editor's needs", so that may apply here if it is useful to you. Also, navigational templates are only supposed to include things which have potential to be articles or redirects to relevant areas. Looking at all the women listed at Lebanon County (Pennsylvania) Women's Hall of Fame, I strongly doubt that all, or even most of them, are notable and would pass WP:GNG. This is an average-sized county and the inductees include local school principals, teachers, sports coaches, local nonprofit workers, neighborhood activists, and mildly successful businesspeople. It is not even clear that the Lebanon County Women's Hall of Fame is actually itself notable. Thus, this is a navigational template that in all likelihood will navigate to nowhere and is really just a duplicate of the parent article. It serves no demonstrable purpose for the rest of the project. -Indy beetle (talk) 02:30, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've moved it to Draft space. — Maile (talk) 11:15, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • It looks like this can be closed as Draftified by creator. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:54, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_December_12&oldid=1128401450"