Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 June 14

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< June 13 June 15 >

June 14 edit

Template:2016 Olympic Table Tennis Schedule edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. --Trialpears (talk) 08:16, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Table tennis at the 2016 Summer Olympics uses a different table with the same information already. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:32, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

WFA Templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. --Trialpears (talk) 08:18, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is no information on the 2016 template nor a mainspace for it. The 2020 template is useless as the Women's Football Alliance canceled the 2020 season in response to the pandemic. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:44, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Both templates are not only unused but have 0 values for the data. Pointless templates. Gonnym (talk) 10:19, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete 2016 is for a division that's unlikely to warrant a separate article, and 2020 is for a non-existent league season. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:27, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:US officer candidate collapsed edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Anthony Bradbury (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:01, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is just a less useful and incomplete version of {{US officer ranks}} which includes more services and grades. It also has limited use, being used on 3 pages and should be deleted. Terasail[✉️] 18:24, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Duplicate of the two templates on the single page. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:20, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom, with the caveat that I'm not an expert on military ranks and it can be a complicated area, so it's possible I'm missing something. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 21:54, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I don't remember why I created this template but I agree the three pages all could use {{US officer ranks}} now. I removed the template in those three pages ( Midshipman, Officer cadet, Officer candidate) Kirk (talk) 20:49, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Leeds Tykes squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:30, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These rugby union squad templates are for non-professional sides, or for sides in non-notable competitions. They also haven't been maintained and I can't see a reason for keeping them. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 16:53, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Should Leeds in particular get back into Championship in future it can be restored then.Skeene88 (talk) 18:13, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all - Considering how few of the links in these three templates are blue, that tells me pretty much everything I need to know about whether we actually need a navbox to get between these players. – PeeJay 18:25, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all the point of these templates is to navigate between players in the squad. As they're not in professional leagues, there won't be enough players with articles to justify the templates. We've deleted similar templates for other sports teams in similar situations. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:44, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2023 Rugby World Cup pool stage key edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. --Trialpears (talk) 21:20, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This template is for something that is going to happen two years down the road for an event happening in six years. It shouldn't be kept waiting around just in case the event will happen. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:50, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. There is no reason to create something this far in advance. Gonnym (talk) 16:52, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete For now, when the 2023 tournament begins it can be recreated. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 17:10, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete not sure why a template would be needed, even in 2023. It can just be added directly to the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:45, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2012-2013 ENC Div1B Games edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. --Trialpears (talk) 21:21, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what rugby tournament this is for, but it remains unused and serves as a scorecard for games, which templates should not be used for. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:23, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2012–13 CHA standings (women) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. --Trialpears (talk) 21:36, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information already exists on the mainspace. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:17, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2009 USL Second Division Standings edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. --Trialpears (talk) 21:38, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information already exists on the mainspace. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:13, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 09:53, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2008-09 Guinness Premiership Table edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. --Trialpears (talk) 22:19, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information already exists on the mainspace. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:13, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2013–14 North One East Table edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. --Trialpears (talk) 22:20, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not used and no mainspace article exists for it to be used. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:13, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. There is no article for the season so nowhere this can be used at. Gonnym (talk) 17:02, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete non-notable amateur league, individual seasons not appropriate. Skeene88 (talk) 18:15, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2020 Major League Soccer Western Conference table with PPG edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. --Trialpears (talk) 22:22, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Superseded by Template:2020 Major League Soccer Western Conference table which contains accurate information and is used on respective pages. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:54, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete the supposed benefit of this template is that it has points per game (PPG) listed. But as the other template also has PPG listed, they are now duplicates of each other. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:59, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 09:53, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2007-08 National Division Three North Table edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:29, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All remain unused. The first template's information exists on the mainspace it was created for. The latter two don't have a mainspace article it was created for. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:15, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:DYK user topicon 3 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:DYK user topicon. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 01:17, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:DYK user topicon 3 with Template:DYK user topicon.
topcicon 3 has an optional hook parameter which can be added if in use and topicicon1 allows the changing if the icon svg with the parameter. No need for 3 templates here. Gonnym (talk) 12:13, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge all don't need 3 templates for this. We should convert the functionality with the parameter into the merged template, so that people can choose which of the 2 icons they want to use. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:49, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support in theory - as author of DYK user topicon 3. However, you're not specifying what to do with number 2. If you can merge all three, great. But oppose just deleting and losing functionality. --GRuban (talk) 13:04, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    @GRuban 2 is exactly like 1 just with a different default icon. However, as the docs for all 3 templates explain, the image can be set with a parameter. Gonnym (talk) 17:08, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge all; I have no doubt that functionality can be maintained. BD2412 T 16:44, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge as long as I am not buying a pig in a poke. And quickly, my userpage looks like *** right now.  Mr.choppers | ✎  19:27, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge: there is no point to keeping 2 additional templates with almost identical functionality. Terasail[✉️] 19:48, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge, basically identical templates. Get these notifications out of my userpage! ◢  Ganbaruby!  (talk) 20:07, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge, per above, these three do the same thing, with differences that can be made into params. Yeeno (talk) 🍁 21:59, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge All three have essentially the same function. No reason to have three templates that all do the exact same thing.--🌀Locomotive207-talk🌀 02:08, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge, clearly no reason for having three templates with the same functionality. However, several users will have to change to using the new template. --littleb2009 (she/her) (talk • contribs) 15:13, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge - all of these are basically the same template, with a few minor differences that can be brought over. Remagoxer (talk) 17:32, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy merge - per other editors and WP:SNOW. aeschylus (talk) 13:59, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge - per others. GeraldWL 14:28, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge. Merge into one Template:DYK user topicon template. Merge, but make sure you got a bot that will auto-edit all instances of the other topicons to add parameters that change the visual icons in the respective topicon templates. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 04:41, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. No opinion on whether to merge, but if they are merged, make sure a bot comes through to ensure the appearance is unchanged. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 08:35, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Got here from User_talk:Coffeeandcrumbs...no opinion on merging, but is there a way to prevent multiple notifications being placed on a page that uses the same template possibly hundreds of times? —valereee (talk) 12:51, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge Possibly with a style option. --Aknell4 (talk · contribs) 13:32, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2020 Thailand Women's Quadrangular Series edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:28, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The event was cancelled, so no article on en.wiki would need this template (2020 Thailand Women's Quadrangular Series redirects to International cricket in 2019–20). This was at a recent TfD in a massive batch of other templates, but that shouldn't preclude a discussion on just this one template Joseph2302 (talk) 08:15, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2016 PLA playoffs edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:26, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not used. Information already featured on the Premier League of America article under the 2016 playoffs section. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:56, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as per nominator, template won't be used as the text is already in article without using the template. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:26, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_June_14&oldid=1073153283"