Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 January 28

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< January 27 January 29 >

January 28 edit

Template:Siblings edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. I can only interpret this as a test page or accident, and have deleted it as such. — The Earwig talk 22:48, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary template, new user creation, possibly mistake or test edit JW 1961 Talk 20:23, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Editnotices/Page/Grace edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This template is badly wrong in two major ways. (1) Blacklinks and redlinks are allowed on DAB pages per WP:DABMENTION. Several editors have cheerfully and correctly ignored this instruction while adding entries to DAB page Grace. (2) Citations are not allowed on DAB pages per WP:DABREF. Every editor of Grace has correctly ignored that instruction. Compare Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 January 16#Template:Editnotices/Page/Aslan (disambiguation), closed as delete.

Note. I have not added {{tfd}} to the page under discussion. If I try to edit it, I get the message, "Warning: This page can only be edited by administrators and other users with the tboverride right because it matches the following title blacklist entry: [some stuff which doesn't copy into here correctly]". I ask the next passing admin to add that template for me. Narky Blert (talk) 18:21, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Added the TfD template. For the record, support deletion, on the same basis as the aforementioned TfD in the nom. — The Earwig talk 22:43, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per previous nomination. Pompous notice contrary to policy for disambiguation pages. Nigej (talk) 06:32, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Question: @Narky Blert:, you said "Blacklinks and redlinks are allowed on DAB pages per WP:DABMENTION". Perhaps I'm missing it, but I can't see that that section says that. Did you link to the right place or am I just dumb? --Xurizuri (talk) 06:22, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    @Xurizuri: I should have cited WP:DABRED for redlinks. Narky Blert (talk) 06:29, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Ah perfect, thank you. --Xurizuri (talk) 06:44, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SIGMA edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 01:14, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This template is equivalent to {{math|Σ}} and is barely used to boot (3 uses). Suggest deletion, though subst-only template after conversion to {{math}} is a second possibility. Izno (talk) 05:15, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Get rid of it I don't have any particular opinion on how it's done (bc I don't know the technicalities), but I don't think this should exist. There's already multiple other ways you can input sigma and those are confusing enough. Only having some greek letters in templates is no good too. --Xurizuri (talk) 06:26, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Isn't the ability to be able to type {{SIGMA}} a good thing? On mobiles, for example, you'd normally have to find the symbol otherwise and copy+paste it. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 15:32, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    No, the above is the HTML reference &Sigma. (I find it bizarre that my phone keyboard carries mu, theta, and omega as their own separate keys, but no other Greek letters. Maybe because it's 4 years going.) --Izno (talk) 18:30, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Seems to be duplication, as does {{TAU}} Nigej (talk) 18:59, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_January_28&oldid=1004916252"