Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 August 4

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< August 3 August 5 >

August 4 edit

Template:Mysore Legislative Assembly election, 1952 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:44, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Propose substituting where these two are used since it won't be updated regularly and has been created for one purpose. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:52, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. These templates have multiple transclusions, and substituting is inefficient compared with the template. --Bsherr (talk) 05:31, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Frietjes (talk) 20:42, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst to the Legislative Assembly election articles and delete and transclude if used elsewhere. Templates are rubbish places to keep election results as they are largely unwatched and prone to vandalism or unsourced changes. It's more efficient to keep them on an article where unwanted changes are more likely to be spotted. Number 57 15:44, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Madras Legislative Assembly election, 1952 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:44, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Propose substituting where these two are used since it won't be updated regularly and has been created for one purpose. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:52, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. These templates have multiple transclusions, and substituting is inefficient compared with the template. --Bsherr (talk) 05:31, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Frietjes (talk) 20:42, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst to the Legislative Assembly election articles and delete and transclude if used elsewhere. Templates are rubbish places to keep election results as they are largely unwatched and prone to vandalism or unsourced changes. It's more efficient to keep them on an article where unwanted changes are more likely to be spotted. Number 57 15:44, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Odisha Legislative Assembly election, 1957 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:43, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Propose substituting where these two are used since it won't be updated regularly with 1961, '67, '80, and '85 being single-use. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:22, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Odisha Legislative Assembly election, 1957, which has multiple transclusions. Substitute and delete the rest, which have one transclusion each. --Bsherr (talk) 04:15, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: consensus to substitute and delete the 1961, 1967, 1980, and 1985 templates, but relisting for more discussion about the 1957 template
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Frietjes (talk) 20:42, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst to the Legislative Assembly election articles and delete and transclude if used elsewhere. Templates are rubbish places to keep election results as they are largely unwatched and prone to vandalism or unsourced changes. It's more efficient to keep them on an article where unwanted changes are more likely to be spotted. Number 57 15:44, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Orissa Legislative Assembly election, 1952 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 August 14. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:51, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Patiala & East Punjab States Union Legislative Assembly election, 1952 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:44, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Propose substituting where these templates are used since these won't be updated as often or used beyond the current pages. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:36, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. These templates all have multiple transclusions. Substituting is less efficient. --Bsherr (talk) 04:13, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Frietjes (talk) 20:40, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst to the Legislative Assembly election articles and delete and transclude if used elsewhere. Templates are rubbish places to keep election results as they are largely unwatched and prone to vandalism or unsourced changes. It's more efficient to keep them on an article where unwanted changes are more likely to be spotted. Number 57 15:44, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:West Bengal elections, 2011 - Results (by constituency) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:45, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2011 is single-use and should be substituted onto the mainspace election artilce it is used for. Same goes for the '52 and '57 since it won't be updated nor have changes made about the election results presented on it. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:53, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Substitute and delete West Bengal elections, 2011 - Results (by constituency); keep the others. The former has only one transclusion. The others have multiple transclusions. --Bsherr (talk) 04:10, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: consensus to substitute and delete the 2011 template, but relisting for more discussion about the other two
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Frietjes (talk) 20:38, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst to the Legislative Assembly election articles and delete and transclude if used elsewhere. Templates are rubbish places to keep election results as they are largely unwatched and prone to vandalism or unsourced changes. It's more efficient to keep them on an article where unwanted changes are more likely to be spotted. Number 57 15:44, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:RGA Chair edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted. Muhibm0307 (talk) 20:42, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 18:26, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Unused, no information, and abandoned after creation. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:30, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sabah state election results, 2013 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:16, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Template:Sabah state election, 2013" exists which is this but with more info DemonStalker (talk) 17:23, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Madhya Bharat Legislative Assembly election, 1952 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:16, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All should be substituted where used with the very least 1962 being single-use. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:45, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Substitute and delete the 1962 template, keep the rest. These latter templates have multiple transclusions, and substituting is inefficient compared with the template. --Bsherr (talk) 05:31, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: consensus to delete the 1962 template, but continuing the discussion for the other three templates
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Frietjes (talk) 15:15, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst to the Legislative Assembly election articles and delete and transclude if used elsewhere. Templates are rubbish places to keep election results as they are largely unwatched and prone to vandalism or unsourced changes. It's more efficient to keep them on an article where unwanted changes are more likely to be spotted. Number 57 15:44, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Kerala Legislative Assembly election, 1957 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:18, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All should be substituted where used with the very least 1965, 1967, and 2006 being single-use. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:38, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep the 1957 and 1960 templates, substitute and delete the rest. The former templates have multiple transclusions, and substituting is inefficient compared with the template. --Bsherr (talk) 05:31, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: consensus to delete the 1965, 1967 and 2006 templates, but continuing the discussion for the 1957 and 1960 templates
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Frietjes (talk) 15:14, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst to the Legislative Assembly election articles and delete and transclude if used elsewhere. Templates are rubbish places to keep election results as they are largely unwatched and prone to vandalism or unsourced changes. It's more efficient to keep them on an article where unwanted changes are more likely to be spotted. Number 57 15:44, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Karnataka Legislative Assembly election, 2013 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:16, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All should be substituted where used with the 1994 and 2004 templates being single-use. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:30, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep the 2013 template, substitute and delete the rest. The former template has multiple transclusions, and substituting is inefficient compared with the template. --Bsherr (talk) 05:31, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: consensus to delete the 1994 and 2004 templates, but continuing the discussion for the 2013 template
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Frietjes (talk) 15:13, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst to the Legislative Assembly election articles and delete and transclude if used elsewhere. Templates are rubbish places to keep election results as they are largely unwatched and prone to vandalism or unsourced changes. It's more efficient to keep them on an article where unwanted changes are more likely to be spotted. Number 57 15:44, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bombay Legislative Assembly election, 1952 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:15, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Propose substituting where these two are used since it won't be updated regularly. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:27, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. These templates have multiple transclusions, and substituting is inefficient compared with the template. --Bsherr (talk) 05:31, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Frietjes (talk) 15:12, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst to the Legislative Assembly election articles and delete and transclude if used elsewhere. Templates are rubbish places to keep election results as they are largely unwatched and prone to vandalism or unsourced changes. It's more efficient to keep them on an article where unwanted changes are more likely to be spotted. Number 57 15:44, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bihar Legislative Assembly election, 1952 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:15, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

At the minimum 2010 is single-use and should be substituted as should the rest since it won't be updated regularly. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:21, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Substitute and delete the 2010 template, keep the rest. These latter templates have multiple transclusions, and substituting is inefficient compared with the template. --Bsherr (talk) 05:31, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Subst and delete - subst to specific election article and section transclude to "elections in India" article. Gonnym (talk) 11:17, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: consensus to delete the 2010 template, but continuing the discussion for the other three
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Frietjes (talk) 15:12, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst to the Legislative Assembly election articles and delete and transclude if used elsewhere. Templates are rubbish places to keep election results as they are largely unwatched and prone to vandalism or unsourced changes. It's more efficient to keep them on an article where unwanted changes are more likely to be spotted. Number 57 15:44, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Himachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly election, 1952 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:15, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Both should be substituted where used since they won't be updated regularly. The 1952 template on the Elections in Himachal Pradesh article is the only table that is a separate template. The 2012 template on the Assembly election results of Himachal Pradesh article is also the only table that is a separate template. There shouldn't be a separate template for the results given the standard on these two articles. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:10, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. These templates have multiple transclusions, and substituting is inefficient compared with the template. --Bsherr (talk) 05:35, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst and delete - subst to specific election article and section transclude to "elections in India" article. Gonnym (talk) 11:11, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Frietjes (talk) 15:11, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst to the Legislative Assembly election articles and delete and transclude if used elsewhere. Templates are rubbish places to keep election results as they are largely unwatched and prone to vandalism or unsourced changes. It's more efficient to keep them on an article where unwanted changes are more likely to be spotted. Number 57 15:44, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Delhi Legislative Assembly election, 1952 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:14, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

At the very least 1993 is unused as the article for the election uses a different table for the results. 1952, 2013, and 2015 should be substituted where used since they won't be updated constantly and truly has one purpose. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:00, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete the 1993 template, keep the rest. These latter templates have multiple transclusions, and substituting is inefficient compared with the template. --Bsherr (talk) 05:31, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Subst and delete - subst to specific election article and section transclude to "elections in India" article. Gonnym (talk) 10:48, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: consensus to delete the 1993, but continuing the discussion for the other three
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Frietjes (talk) 15:11, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst to the Legislative Assembly election articles and delete and transclude if used elsewhere. Templates are rubbish places to keep election results as they are largely unwatched and prone to vandalism or unsourced changes. It's more efficient to keep them on an article where unwanted changes are more likely to be spotted. Number 57 15:44, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly election, 1952 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:14, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The 1952 and 1957 templates are used on two articles and won't require constant updating. 2012 is single-use. All three should be substituted onto the respective article it is used on. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:31, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Substitute and delete the 2012 template, keep the rest. These latter templates have multiple transclusions, and substituting is inefficient compared with the template. --Bsherr (talk) 05:31, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Subst and delete - subst to specific election article and section transclude to "elections in India" article. Gonnym (talk) 10:48, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: consensus to delete the 2012, but continuing the discussion for the other two
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Frietjes (talk) 15:10, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst to the Legislative Assembly election articles and delete and transclude if used elsewhere. Templates are rubbish places to keep election results as they are largely unwatched and prone to vandalism or unsourced changes. It's more efficient to keep them on an article where unwanted changes are more likely to be spotted. Number 57 15:44, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bangladesh squad 2016 South Asian Games edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:17, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Long established consensus on WP:FOOTY and per the outcomes of previous TfD discussions, international squad navigational boxes should only exist for the men and women's: World Cup, Confederations Cup, Olympics and each continent's top level competition. None of these templates are for such a competition, and therefore should be deleted. --BlameRuiner (talk) 05:46, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_August_4&oldid=1038771605"