Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 October 5

October 5

Template:Steady Ground

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. czar 20:11, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

• Template:Steady Ground (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only 4 navigable (blue) links apart from the head article. So it fails WP:NENAN. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:57, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

• Delete per nom Steven (Editor) (talk) 18:31, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
• Delete The band has no notable releases, the related bands should not be included in the template, leaving only two links of band members that might barely pass WP:MUSICBIO, which is not enough links to justify having a navigational template. Aspects (talk) 03:56, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Chad Stahelski

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. czar 22:28, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

• Template:Chad Stahelski (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is a complete subset of {{John Wick}}. It may be useful if he directs a film outside of the franchise one day, but at this point it's WP:TOOSOON. Nardog (talk) 03:28, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

• Delete per precedent at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 November 21#Template:Carlos Saldanha. Stahelski has not done anything that isn't a John Wick movie yet. Should he do so, the template can be re-created then, but as it stands it's 100% redundant. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:43, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Black Foxxes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. czar 20:11, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

• Template:Black Foxxes (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:SHVPES (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Selfish Things (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

With only one or two albums each, none of these templates offer any additional navigational benefit from existing links within the articles. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 03:26, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

• Delete all per WP:NENAN. Too little content. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:27, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
• Delete There are not enough links in any of these templates to justify having a navigational template and WP:NENAN. Aspects (talk) 03:57, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

It's fine to delete them then. Thanks! Martinarocks (talk) 13:32, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

• Just delete it anyway! WP:NENAN. Hansen Sebastian^Talk 12:34, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).