Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 May 24

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< May 23 May 25 >

May 24 edit

Template:Infobox benefit concert edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:09, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wasn't used in any articles until today. It was added to one article but that article should be using {{Infobox song}}. The infobox appears to be an abandoned attempt at an infobox based on {{Infobox television}}. The code used is straight from Infobox television with only minor, incomplete changes. The error tracking was still that from Infobox television, which put articles using this inforbox into television categories. AussieLegend (✉) 16:41, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as the editor that used the template without realizing how out-of-date it was... I would also be okay with redirecting the page to {{Infobox television}} so that old revisions of pages that used this template don't look wonky. - PaulT+/C 17:18, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hit FM Top 10 Albums of the Year edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 June 1. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:11, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Nenhum de Nós edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:10, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This band's navigational template consists of one valid link: the band's article. The template has a lot of redlinks, two albums redirected back to the band's article for being non-notable and a related band article that does not include this template. This navigational template navigates nowhere, is unnecessary and WP:NENAN. Aspects (talk) 04:27, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, InvalidOS (talk) 16:11, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Dangerous edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Seems like the arguments provided against a redirect are reasonable Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:57, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This template was only relevant when {{High-use}} and {{High-risk}} were two separate templates, but they have been merged in this TfD.

This survived a previous TfD as no consensus, but the circumstances are different now. eπi (talk | contribs) 21:24, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Can't this simply be turned into a redirect to Template:High-use, so that editors who are used to it can continue to use it? There could be a downside due to the generic name, but are there other templates that this could be confused with? – Uanfala (talk) 12:55, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    (edit conflict × Gonnym) @Uanfala: The thing about subst-only templates is that there's probably not too many editors even aware of it, and those that are probably know it was merged. The only reason to be aware of such a template is if one was aware that high-use and high-risk were separate template; I certainly was not aware of the distinction when it existed, so most editors probably weren't either. Even if one did accidentally transclude it in that knowledge, the red-link links to this TfD, and it could be fixed (I think the probability of that is low though, which is part of the reason I'm proposing deletion).
    More broadly, the name is not particularly connected to the concepts of "high-use" or "high-risk". It's a rather generic, general title, so I don't see a reason to redirect it to this set of templates in particular (even considering its prior history).
    As for are there other templates that this could be confused with?, I just crafted a quick query to check it out. There are currently 12 other distinct non-subpage templates that contain the phrase "danger":
  • None of these have some unambiguous connection to the generic name "Dangerous". I suppose one could argue the album navbox could use that as a redirect, but I'm in favor of encouraging the "(album)" suffix. If a valid redirect use-case arises in the future, it could certainly be recreated, but I don't see an obvious one at present. Retro (talk | contribs) 11:39, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:53, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and not redirect. Templates, especially those that have only 1 possible usage in a page, should use their full name as it makes identifying them in the wikicode much more easier. And to Uanfala, there are two other templates named "Dangerous": {{Dangerous (album)}} and {{Dangerous Toys}}. --Gonnym (talk) 11:18, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Austrian district edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was replace and delete. Primefac (talk) 16:35, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Replace and delete

District commission-specific wrapper for {{Infobox settlement}}, with limited transclusions, on pretty stable sets of articles. Subst:itution will reduce the maintenance overhead, reduce the cognitive burden for editors, and enable articles to benefit more immediately from improvements to the current parent template.

Note: Despite being named "Infobox settlement" the template is not only used for settlements. Per its documentation, Infobox settlement is "used to produce an Infobox for human settlements (cities, towns, villages, communities) as well as other administrative districts, counties, provinces, et cetera—in fact, any subdivision below the level of a country".

Other entities (states, court districts, cities, villages ...) already transclude {{Infobox settlement}} directly.

Visualisation of Austria place infobox usage
Infobox usage on articles about places in Austria

78.55.244.235 (talk) 10:22, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Replace and delete per nom. Limited (and likely final) number of stable articles. No need for a separate infobox.--Darwinek (talk) 19:34, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Replace and delete per nom. TerraCyprus (talk) 08:53, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Replace and delete per nom and per Darwinek. Will make editing in eastern Europe easier. JelgavaLV (talk) 19:34, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Roster maintenance edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 June 1. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:56, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Northern Arizona Elite edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 June 5. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:02, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2019_May_24&oldid=900474707"