Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 June 1

< May 31	June 2 >

June 1 edit

Template:2019 Campeonato Carioca Preliminary Group edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:09, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2019 Campeonato Carioca Preliminary Group (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unnecessary fork of the table in the article Frietjes (talk) 15:50, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Zac ary (talk) 15:56, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2008 Cleveland Browns schedule edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:34, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2008 Cleveland Browns schedule (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:2007 Cleveland Browns schedule (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

orphaned here and here Frietjes (talk) 15:38, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:47, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both per nominator. Unused. Ajf773 (talk) 18:52, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Roster maintenance edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge Frietjes (talk) 14:01, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Roster maintenance (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Squad maintenance (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Roster maintenance with Template:Squad maintenance.
Same exact template with the difference being the hardcoded word "Roster" or "Squad" for display (not for any internal processing). These should have a more generic name anyways, as it's not used only for sports-related templates. The tool is named "Template linking and transclusion check" so something similar can be used to name the combined template. Gonnym (talk) 09:18, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am not opposing. --Leyo 21:57, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge - Makes absolute sense and I agree that a more generic name is required – Ianblair23 (talk) 08:30, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per Ianblair23. Störm (talk) 18:36, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Um, merge to which name?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:56, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jo-Jo Eumerus: if that is the only reason you relisted this, then please close. The renaming can be done with WP:RM - this was a merge discussion. --Gonnym (talk) 11:54, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BOYTOY edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:42, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BOYTOY (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Useless now that all previously linked articles have been moved to draft. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 01:52, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

speedy delete per CSD:G8. Frietjes (talk) 14:12, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Stick Figure Suicide edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:42, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Stick Figure Suicide (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Useless now that all previously linked articles have been moved to draft. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 01:49, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

speedy delete per CSD:G8. Frietjes (talk) 14:13, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hit FM Top 10 Albums of the Year edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:10, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hit FM Top 10 Albums of the Year (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is the type of Navbox that is probably better served as a list then a template. However, many of these albums don't even have articles and the ones that do don't mention its top ten placement nor does the Hit FM article mention anything about albums at all. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 16:26, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:11, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

delete, over navboxing. Frietjes (talk) 14:14, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).