Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 May 20

May 20 edit

Template:Image hoax edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Primefac (talk) 00:47, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If an image is being used to support a hoax, the article in question should be tagged. I don't see why we need a separate template for files alone. funplussmart (talk) 22:45, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. You can have an image without an article, negating your sole reason for deletion. MarkZusab (talk) 07:00, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: In case someone else has anything to say
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:27, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mosques in Lebanon edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep but there is no prejudice against renomination if a different reason is given. Primefac (talk) 00:48, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox with only 4 links. WP:NENAN Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:51, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Now has more links, but is still unused
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DannyS712 (talk) 03:47, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Update: I've added the template to the articles it links to. – Uanfala (talk) 13:25, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relist to see if people are happy with the current solution
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:26, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:List of world's fairs in Nordic countries edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 May 28. Primefac (talk) 00:50, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2010 Santosh Trophy Cluster I edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:48, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged (with attribution) with the parent article per consensus at WT:FOOTY Frietjes (talk) 13:16, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 12:45, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Topic series doc edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:08, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose discussing Template:Topic series doc.
So, this is probably a weird nomination (since I just created this template only a few minutes ago)...

People might right remember the discussions that happened on sidebars. You know those "[Person's name] series" templates? Well, I looked at the documentation on a few after creating {{Tom DeLay series}}. I learned a bunch of them had copy/pasted docs, and I figured I should possibly do something about that.

Basically, I am looking to replace a bunch of /doc subpages with this template. I have currently implemented this template at {{Tom DeLay series}}, {{Xi Jinping sidebar}}, and {{Gary Johnson series}} for the purposes of this TfD.

Is this template redundant to the doc subpages, and should it be deleted? –MJLTalk 05:30, 10 May 2019 (UTC) CE 00:01, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:26, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment @MJL: It seems like you erroneously added the TfM notice instead of the TfD notice in this edit.
  • Keep, but make it more clear that it's a metatemplate for documentation. Instead of placing the main content in {{documentation}}, make the {{documentation|content=}} contain the documentation for the metatemplate. Then it could be used by placing {{documentation|Template:Topic series doc}} on templates that use this page for documentation instead of placing placing {{Topic series doc}}. I'll might make an example in Template:Topic series doc/sandbox (I can definitely do so if you want me to).
  • You can also see an example of this with some template pages I created for this: Template:GAN subtemplates, Template:GAR subtemplates (this is a bit of a different situation, though, because I'm planning to modularize these components and TfD them in the somewhat near future.) Retro (talk | contribs) 23:05, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    @Retro: That would be super helpful! Thank you Also, fixed.MJLTalk 16:07, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    @MJL: I started something in the sandbox. You might want to check if it works; I haven't tested it, and may have missed something.
    It gets invoked like follows (copied from Template:Documentation/doc):
<!--Last line of your template code--><noinclude>
{{Documentation |1=Template:Any page/doc
| content =
{{Template:Any page/doc |parameters}}
}}</noinclude>
  • I think I was initially slightly mistaken, but I've looked around and seen a few other similar templates to yours, so it's not without precedent to format in this way (and, as mentioned above, it's explicitly accounted for in the {{Documentation}} docs). Retro (talk | contribs) 12:30, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Listen/core edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 00:03, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused following the creation of Module:Listen and this edit by Mr. Stradivarius in 2014 DannyS712 (talk) 05:42, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Население edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 June 5. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:09, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Dorothy Davenport edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 07:46, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Includes no links - violates WP:EXISTING. DannyS712 (talk) 02:12, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Links have been added by the creator, however, there is still many unlinked (and redlinked) items in the navbox. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 22:34, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If I might ask - how may links do you need to justify an actor/actress/director's template? As more silent films are added to wikipedia, more links will be created for this very famous silent film actress. This template provides an instant access to this actress's body of work in several areas. I'm just curious, of all the actor/actress/director templates in wikipedia - why was this one singled out?

Thanks Mtjannetta (talk) 15:07, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 02:11, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I have removed performances per WP:PERFNAV. At least 20 of the films, about half, are linked now. Nomination rationale is no longer valid. – Jonesey95 (talk) 07:44, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2016 NCAA Division I baseball independents standings edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:54, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused standings template. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:21, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is used now.-UCO2009bluejay (talk) 20:15, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DannyS712 (talk) 01:11, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 00:34, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Chronology of military events in the American Civil War edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 June 5. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:09, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).