Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 May 28

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion | Log
< May 27 May 29 >

May 28

edit

Module:Graph:Utils

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:52, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No longer used after conversion of Template:Graph:Map (then called Template:Graph:Highlighted world map by country) to use Module:Graph. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:18, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Calendar

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:52, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. See Module talk:WikidataIB#Lua script and other errors on tewiki for an explanation as to why this module is template-protected despite being unused. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:07, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If it's unused and isn't likely to be used, then we should get rid of it. Although I should add the caveat that it should be deleted without prejudice to its recreation if it becomes needed at some point in the future, such as someone wishing to use all of the functionality of Module:Complex date. --RexxS (talk) 22:02, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If someone writes code that uses the rest of Module:Complex date, then they will need to re-import Module:Calendar from commons anyway; the current version of Module:Calendar would produce an error if it were ever called by Module:Complex date. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:04, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'm hoping someday to find the time to consolidate the usable functionality of Module:Complex date and its chain of dependencies into a couple of modules in order to reduce the problems of installation of WikidataIB for folks like the tewiki users. Hopefully I'll be able to reduce the bloat as well as the number of modules to maintain. We could see at that point whether Module:Complex date was being used elsewhere, and make a decision about it. --RexxS (talk) 22:34, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That would definitely be a good idea. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:40, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Unriddle

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:13, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

3 links seems a bit low to require a nav template. All 3 links appear at the top of the pages of all 3. Gonnym (talk) 17:35, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:UHFVHF

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:53, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template and looking at the code, seems pretty pointless. Gonnym (talk) 17:33, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Campaignbox Ararat rebellion

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:13, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Navigates 2 articles total. I've added one of the links (which was not present) to Template:Campaignbox Kurdish rebellions in Turkey. Izno (talk) 16:22, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Scott Morrison sidebar

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 June 5. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:55, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Minnesota Fighting Pike

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:55, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough links. Two links are back to the main article on the team. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:27, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Top25

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 June 5. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:55, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:List of world's fairs in Nordic countries

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:List of world exhibitions. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:56, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:List of world's fairs in Nordic countries with Template:List of world exhibitions.
Some duplicate entries. Seems like this could be merged? PPEMES (talk) 11:21, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How would you merge them? Pelmeen10 (talk) 17:09, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
But adding the material that doesn't preexist in the destination. PPEMES (talk) 14:19, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'm a bit confused (not super used to commenting on discussions) - but why does this exist twice? (I commented in the other entry) Icarusgeek (talk) 15:37, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That's the implied question of this request. PPEMES (talk) 14:27, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This TFD was listed twice and the template was never properly tagged for discussion. Perhaps this should be fixed and relisted? StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 15:00, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:24, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 00:50, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Prefecture Japan

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 June 5. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:56, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2019_May_28&oldid=900474052"