Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 May 3

May 3 edit

Sports Illustrated Swimsuit navboxes edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 May 14. Primefac (talk) 02:03, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1964–1969 Sports Illustrated Swimsuit edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 May 14. Primefac (talk) 02:03, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Fictional health navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 May 13. Primefac (talk) 00:33, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Galgame edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:32, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

and all related subpages. Appears to be a zhwiki Infobox that overlaps with Infobox Animanga and Infobox video game, with no main space use or discussion on its need. Context seems to be limited to a very specific form of video game. Many of the fields are ones that have been deliberately removed from Infobox video game. -- ferret (talk) 13:16, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Don't see how {{Infobox video games}} or {{Infobox animanga/Game}} (for non-notable games that are part of a larger media franchise) couldn't handle the topic areas. —Farix (t | c) 13:24, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not quite sure what this is made for besides just being a copy from ZH? I would say that lack of discussion is by default reason to not have this. And I doubt that a discussion would result in consensus that we need this. The templates we have (linked above) appear more than sufficient, besides having years of consensus on all the criteria and such. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 13:43, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above. Lordtobi () 14:11, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Chinese based IPs keep removing the deletion notification on the template, replacing it with one that falsely claims that the decision closed as merge to {{Infobox animanga/Game}}. —Farix (t | c) 14:17, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. We don't even have infobox visual novel as those are covered by the above listed templates already. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 16:33, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The draft by a different user at Draft:Template:Infobox Galgame should also go, along with sub pages. Note the page creator of the one in template space, Sistrxs, has done a series of odd page moves too that need cleaned up. -- ferret (talk) 20:19, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, already covered by Infobox video games, and doesn't add anything (that we would cover in an infobox). And yes, I agree that the draft and sub-pages Ferret linked should be deleted too, for the same reason.--Alexandra IDVtalk 08:34, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).