Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 April 6

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< April 5 April 7 >

April 6 edit

Template:Infobox Russian city/doc edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G8 by Plastikspork (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unneeded documentation for redirected template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:26, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Non-government organizations in India edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete but for slightly different reasons from what Devopam gave. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:45, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is a redirect to the correctly spelled 'O' (capitalized). Devopam (talk) 11:45, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

normally, I would say "go discuss it at RFD", but looking at the template history, I say speedy delete per author request. Frietjes (talk) 12:37, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NGO Delhi edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:33, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Contains single entry, defeating the very purpose. Not linked from Devopam (talk) 11:24, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Not enough links....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 01:20, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete As per nomination and above. VasuVR (talk, contribs) 02:50, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. One list entry does not deserve a template. Ajf773 (talk) 08:32, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Footer Olympic Champions Women's mass start edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:58, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Footer Olympic Champions Women's mass start with Template:Footer Olympic Champions Men's mass start.
Follow up from deletion discussion at Women's mass start (no consensus), these templates need to be discussed together. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 10:56, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep – as there will be an follow-up event in 2022 Olympics in Beijing, China (referance for that), and can't really see a reason for a possible deltion now and then a recreation of it in about four years (seems to me like a triggerhappy deletion reason). All other navigational boxes for Olympic champions in speed skating are per event and per gender see also the one that is not alike the other Template:Footer Olympic Champions Allround Speed Skating Men, which will not probably be contested again in the olympics. Allthough I think it could have been a possibility that it could have been included in the Olympics at the 1928 Olympics, but back then the last distance was abandon halfway through and therefore no fourth distance results were official. Best regards Migrant (talk) 22:24, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete both - as there is never a reason to use a navbox with only one entry. Claiming it will get more populated in the future is WP:CRYSTALBALLing. And if it does, simply remake the navbox once it has around five or more entries. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 20:57, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment – @Dissident93: Not crystallballing as i have given a reference for the upcoming follow-up event in the next Winter Olympics in 2022 in Beijing. Best regards Migrant (talk) 03:36, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
      • Still changes nothing, as this will only have a single entry until 2022. Just recreate it when it's time. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 05:30, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
        • Well, it has for the time being 4 outgoing article-links and it is transcluded at 2 articlepages, for now, until the article for the upcoming event article are created. The upcoming event-article can of course be created from and with the reference I have already given above. Best regards Migrant (talk) 14:27, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete both. Not enough links at present to warrant a navbox. --woodensuperman 08:20, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment – @Woodensuperman: There are by the way 4 outgoing links for the time being from the template (template-header links to a list of speed skating olympic winners, Speed skating event with results, The winners of the event, and nation at the olympics-article for the winner). Best regards Migrant (talk) 04:09, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
      • We shouldn't be linking to the "nation at the olympics" article. --woodensuperman 15:53, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete both, we can recreate it in 4 years if the event happens again. Frietjes (talk) 22:31, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment – @Frietjes: It is scheduled to happen again se my reference above in my keep-vote above. Best regards Migrant (talk) 14:32, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all, doesn't provide sufficient navigation to be useful. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:45, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete both I suppose I'm "involved" since I voted on the last one, but there's no reason why these need to sit around under-navigating for 3-4 years until the next Games. Refunds and recreations are easy. Primefac (talk) 18:05, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Requires attention edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 April 15. Primefac (talk) 15:57, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2018_April_6&oldid=837484869"