Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 April 15

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< April 14 April 16 >

April 15 edit

Template:Orthodoxy COTM edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was wrong venue @Chicbyaccident: rename template please use WP:RM instead, thanks. (non-admin closure) Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 04:56, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Orthodoxy COTM with Template:Eastern Orthodoxy COTM.
Rename template per consistency. Chicbyaccident (talk) 22:01, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:R7sWQ2018YOG edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. after merging the edit history Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:51, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 20:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC) Also nominating the following for the same reason:[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Requires attention edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Primefac (talk) 00:35, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recreation of template redirected to {{cleanup}} in 2006. Even worse than cleanup, since it has no reason parameter. Lojbanist remove cattle from stage 03:11, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak keep, it kind of does have a reason parameter, since it directs you to the talk page for the reason. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:46, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 15:57, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Luhan edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:04, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There are only five links in the article. There are three for the artist: a redirect to the artist's article, a discography link that redirects to the artist's article and an awards link that redirects to a section of the artist article. There are two related links: the band the artist was a member of and entertainment company, neither of which use this template. Therefore only one link for the artist makes this navigational template unnecessary. Aspects (talk) 07:02, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Mass Fb team templates Japan (2) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete after replacement. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:08, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Old style, no need, even some of are redlinks, should be subst or replaced by other template or style, such as using Module:Sports results and Module:Sports table. Previous discussions plaese see WT:FOOTY and previous TfDs. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 01:06, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 07:07, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think it is better to use direct interlinks in the articles if it can do it. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 07:12, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, it's time to finally kill all of these. Frietjes (talk) 14:54, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all Per previous discussion. Matthew_hk tc 07:26, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per nom, templates are unnecessary for simple wikilinks. S.A. Julio (talk) 02:19, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - long-standing consensus that these kind of templates are not needed. GiantSnowman 17:24, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Monaco Grand Prix winners edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:06, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The template duplicates Monaco Grand Prix article and doesn't help with navigation. I.e. in case of Sebastian Vettel and Lewis Hamilton the page will be overloaded with the templates of different Grand Prix winners. Corvus tristis (talk) 04:51, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Brazilian Grand Prix winners edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:01, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The template duplicates Brazilian Grand Prix article and doesn't help with navigation. I.e. in case of Sebastian Vettel and Lewis Hamilton the page will be overloaded with the templates of different Grand Prix winners. Corvus tristis (talk) 04:51, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2018_April_15&oldid=875138373"