Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 January 3

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< January 2 January 4 >

January 3 edit

Template:Alma edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob13Talk 14:17, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation template with nothing to navigate between (just like the first nomination) The Banner talk 23:04, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:THQ Nordic edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob13Talk 21:24, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Useless template gives nopropper overview, but is scattered around a lot of articles not connected to each other, except for its retrospective ownership. It also includes many unlinked (nonexistent) items, which defeats the template's own purpose. Lordtobi (✉) 20:41, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. I don't see the benefit of a navbox that lists a publisher's intellectual properties. Navboxes are intended to provide links that are somehow related to each other, the only thing these games have in common is that they're published by the same company. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 09:42, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is not a timeless list, such as a list of works produced by THQ Nordic, but the list of rights to games owned by this company at some point in time (presumably January 2017). It might be useful to include this information on our THQ Nordic page, but not as a navbox. I'd keep this, but retain only the "Original properties" row, and spin out the big enough rows into their own templates. A game's rights can change hands many times, but the game can only have been created once. Daß Wölf 16:29, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Ironically, despite me being the creator of the template, I don't think it's necessary anymore. I've changed my mind because, the THQ Nordic article finally has a presentable page dedicated to the acquisitions that THQ/THQ Nordic have gone through with intellectual properties. Iftekharahmed96 (talk) 15:42, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page .

Template:SharedIPBlocked edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob13Talk 21:27, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is redundant to the combination of {{sharedip}} and {{anonblock}}. I replaced the only transclusion with {{schoolblock}} (since it was located below a {{repeat vandal}} and a {{sharedipedu}}). KATMAKROFAN (talk) 23:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 18:18, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. It would be in a good mood if some IP addresses have the template that you nominated it for deletion. Right now, I could see that they didn't use the template. 45.23.131.171 (talk) 22:16, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Country data Kharkiv People's Republic edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete (no opposition). REFUND applies. As a minor note, Kharkiv People's Republic did exist, albeit briefly and not as an officially recognized country. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 18:00, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is no such a country as Kharkiv People's Republic. It is pure imagination. It did not existed even 1 minute Oude-rusman (talk) 12:57, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Vgrtbl-bl/sandbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete (non-admin closure) Lordtobi (✉) 12:53, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Abandoned sandbox of deleted template, should as well be deleted. Lordtobi (✉) 12:17, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • As an ancillary of a deleted template this is a straightforward G6 candidate. Ping me and I'll delete it myself; this doesn't need a full TfD. (Likewise for any future cases of the same.) Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 12:45, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Vgrtbl-bl/doc edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete (non-admin closure) Lordtobi (✉) 12:53, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Abandoned documentation of deleted template, should as well be deleted. Lordtobi (✉) 12:17, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Vgrtbl-tx/doc edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete (non-admin closure) Lordtobi (✉) 12:53, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Abandoned documentation of deleted template, should as well be deleted. Lordtobi (✉) 12:16, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Vgrtbl/text/doc edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete (non-admin closure) Lordtobi (✉) 12:53, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Abandoned documentation of deleted template, should as well be deleted. Lordtobi (✉) 12:16, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Athletic conference navboxes edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 January 19. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:11, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Shared IP 1 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 January 12 ~ Rob13Talk 21:28, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Fb competition UEFA Euro 2016 qualifying edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 00:08, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template, and the "fb competition" templates are meant for club competitions, not international tournaments. Secret Agent Julio (talk) 02:51, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 19:25, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2017_January_3&oldid=1051101239"