Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 April 4

< April 3	April 5 >

April 4 edit

Template:Baghel clans edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:29, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Baghel clans (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. I think this is a poor attempt at a navbox template but its only use would be at Baghel and, being unsourced and unlinked, it adds nothing even there. Sitush (talk) 18:02, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Useless.--Molandfreak (talk, contribs, email) 22:13, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Editnotices/Page/Power Rangers edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 April 11. (non-admin closure) - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 05:31, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Editnotices/Page/Power Rangers (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Chakri Queens edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:29, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Chakri Queens (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

See Wikipedia:Templates for discussion#Reasons to delete a template, "2. The template is redundant to a better-designed template". The pictures are too small to be seen and the queens are already linked through Template:Queens and Consorts of Thailand. Celia Homeford (talk) 14:30, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete, the navbox is better for navigation. Frietjes (talk) 15:43, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Subreddit edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Test page. (non-admin closure) – Train2104 (t • c) 15:05, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Subreddit (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused external link template, hardcoded with a specific target. Opencooper (talk) 11:14, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Uw-userspacenoindex edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 April 14. Primefac (talk) 12:44, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Uw-userspacenoindex (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pp-main-page edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 April 11. (non-admin closure) - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 05:31, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pp-main-page (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:MFM edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:30, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MFM (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Mostly redlinks. WP:NENAN. KMF (talk) 00:05, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete, bad name for a navbox. but, we should allow it to be recreated (with a different name) if a couple more articles are written. Frietjes (talk) 15:42, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BritishTerrorism edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Consensus seems to be concerned with the scope and accuracy of the template. List of terrorist incidents in Great Britain exists, and I'm happy to sandbox this upon request if the contents need to be checked against existing categories/list articles. Primefac (talk) 12:44, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BritishTerrorism (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

A bit of a strange intersection for a navbox, which also seems to contain other articles not related to its title. Not really useful as it stands. Would be better for category navigation. No article on the topic, fails WP:NAVBOX. -- Rob Sinden (talk) 12:26, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep people interested in British terrorism would be interested in the incidents and perpetrators listed in the template. It could probably be expanded to a portal.MeropeRiddle (talk) 18:48, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per nom. - Mlpearc (open channel) 18:59, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep, I feel editors should be aware of what this is, and always has been. It ISN'T 'British Terrorism', since it omits numerous examples, notably N.Ireland related events and people. Actually, until a few days ago, the title was "Alleged militants in the War on Terror who have lived in the United Kingdom", some of us have been trying to improve that title over the last few days (see and add to the discussion on talk). I can see the value of such a template, but obviously title and contents need to align and have some objective criteria for inclusion. Pincrete (talk) 22:54, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
delete, better as a list article. Frietjes (talk) 18:53, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete. Despite the name "British Terrorism", the template's scope is neither all the acts of terrorism committed by British nationals or residents nor all the acts of terrorism committed on British soil. Additionally, it does not discern between religious terrorism, political violence and criminal violence. Instead, it uses a rather peculiar criterion which is the perpetrator's religion or faith and thus needlessly links religion and terrorism way beyond the scope of religious terrorism. Hence, delete. — kashmiri ^TALK 20:54, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 00:05, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, but start a list article based on the template.--Molandfreak (talk, contribs, email) 22:15, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).