Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 April 14

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< April 13 April 15 >

April 14 edit

Template:Alfa Romeo gallery edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Merge with the article and delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:17, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused template, pure decoration The Banner talk 21:03, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • keep, this is a chronological & pictorial view of this marque's history, and provides information beyond that of a written history. If it was "pure decoration", this gallery would not provide information.Ketil3 (talk) 04:40, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • merge with the article, then delete. single use template. Frietjes (talk) 14:49, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Concerns and controversies at the Olympics edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus, {{Olympic Games controversies}} template was modified after this discussion was started, and no new comments were made thereafter. Please feel free to renominate the template if you would still like to see it deleted. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:04, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Entirely redundant to Template:Olympic_Games_controversies and mostly made up of redlinks. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:13, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 00:19, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Regardless of the redlinks in the template, the template provides legitimate links to seven different articles, which is more than enough to justify a navigational template.--Molandfreak (talk, contribs, email) 06:18, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, but alter into a single line boxed template... so the 6 blue links of 53 theoretical pages are on the same line. Use the {{void}} template to escape around the elements and parts of the base structures, as @Frietjes: says, thereby enabling only the blue links which are populated pages. I'm trying to reconcile myself to these dates and articles, versus the much more ample contents of Template:Olympic_Games_controversies.
    @Sander.v.Ginkel:+Nickst+Huggi: Is there some reason you can't map this template under discussion onto more of the pages listed on the other, and does this mean there are more than one series on Controversies of the Olympics?
    Otherwise, hide the danged thing until at least 50% of entries have pages! Not convinced anyone is going to research all those older years, so suspect yours is a forlorn cause! Good luck! FrankB 08:55, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge into {{Olympic Games controversies}}, removing old years. 194.50.51.252 (talk) 21:39, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The {{Olympic Games controversies}} template has been modified to include the existing information. Pinging @Frietjes, Molandfreak, and Koavf: for thoughts on the update, as this was the primary concern for keeping the "Concerns" template.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 15:30, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CanadianTerrorism edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Move to List of terrorist incidents in Canada Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:20, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NAVBOX, similar template {{BritishTerrorism}} recently closed as delete. Olidog (talk) 13:10, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:British honours system edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 April 22 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:06, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Current Scottish MSPs edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 April 22 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:06, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Uw-userspacenoindex edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 April 22 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:06, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1996 CBA Playoffs edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:26, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

single-use templates which I have merged with the articles, so the template-space versions are no longer needed Frietjes (talk) 00:26, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2017_April_14&oldid=1138532574"