Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 December 30

< December 29	December 31 >

December 30 edit

Template:AR talk edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Keep (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 22:44, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AR talk (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

AR was marked as historical 3 years ago. Redirect to {{whois}}. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 21:16, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep since Template:AR talk has transclusions and has a parameter {{{2}}} but Template:Whois does not have a parameter {{{2}}}. However, if parameter {{{2}}} from Template:AR talk can be merged into Template:Whois, then weak merge. Steel1943 (talk) 22:13, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep many transclusion with a parameter and used for a different purpose than whois. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:11, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ActiveUser edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 02:07, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ActiveUser (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template, most probably a test JMHamo (talk) 21:08, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete, not needed. Frietjes (talk) 22:50, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox basketball season edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 January 8 (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 00:07, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox basketball season (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox WNBA season (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox sports season (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Railmap-hide/Northeast Corridor edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was move to userspace Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:21, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Railmap-hide/Northeast Corridor (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused in mainspace, userfy Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 11:17, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete, not needed. Frietjes (talk) 22:50, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Railmap-row/Northeast Corridor edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was move to userspace Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:22, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Railmap-row/Northeast Corridor (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused in mainspace, userfy Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 11:17, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete, not needed. Frietjes (talk) 22:49, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Railmap-5 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was move to userspace Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:22, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Railmap-5 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused in mainspace, could be userfied Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 11:16, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete, not needed. Frietjes (talk) 22:49, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Railmap-3 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was move to userspace Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:22, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Railmap-3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused in mainspace, could be userfied Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 11:15, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete, not needed. Frietjes (talk) 22:49, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Anonblock-vandal edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge/redirect. No opposition. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 22:46, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Anonblock-vandal (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Anonblock (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Anonblock-vandal with Template:Anonblock.
I like the tmbox used by anonblock-vandal, but sadly, it's redundant and created by a blocked user. A merge sounds like a better option, as anonblock-vandal uses the standardized coffeeroll format and anonblock uses the format used by schoolblock and checkuserblock in 2008. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 03:38, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've redirected Anonblock-vandal to Anonblock, though it would probably have qualified for deletion under WP:T3. I haven't removed the TfD template from Template:Anonblock in case others disagree with my action. A discussion about changing the anonblock template needs to happen on it's talk page. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 23:02, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Northern-Pacific-railway-routemap edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 02:06, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Northern-Pacific-railway-routemap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

A single-use template (now unused in mainspace) that was replaced by {{US-railway-routemap}}. Useddenim (talk) 00:45, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete, no longer needed. Frietjes (talk) 18:29, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Gotham characters edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 02:05, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Gotham characters (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This form of table is deprecated per many discussions at MOS:TV, and usages of this template have been reverted on the two articles it was used on (main Gotham article, where cast is meant to be listed in prose, and the Gotham characters page, where the table resides in its natural format). Alex|The|Whovian^? 00:11, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete, we don't need to split this off into a template. Frietjes (talk) 22:49, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

But Is this going to end soon. 2600:8803:7A00:19:8411:5797:7BA9:1305 (talk) 17:27, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).