Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 February 10

< February 9	February 11 >

February 10 edit

Template:Co-sponsors of the USA Freedom Act edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:07, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Co-sponsors of the USA Freedom Act (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

used in just one template, the info can easily be substituted there. The Banner talk 22:27, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's 263 lines long; good use of template Anonymouscoward2421 (talk) 22:31, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There are few exceptions to the general consensus that templates are for inclusion in more than one page. —PC-XT+ 03:19, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 15:30, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Transmitter edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:07, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Transmitter (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose delete. Radio station transmitter coordinate template which links to Google Maps. Redundant to standard {{Coord}} template, which is almost universally used in radio station articles, and which has much greater functionality (including Google Maps link). Nearly all articles using template are from Cleveland radio market. I primarily focus on Cleveland radio, and I mistook this template as one of the standard links included in {{AM station data}} and/or {{FM station data}}. I have probably done more to keep this template alive than any other editor, yet even I see no reason for its continued use. Levdr1lp / talk 22:06, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom —PC-XT+ 03:22, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment if this is kept it will definitely need renaming, the name is highly opaque, and it is not what one would logically think it was, a box of links to types of transmitters or parts of transmitters. -- 70.24.244.161 (talk) 06:11, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. —PC-XT+ 07:04, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per nom. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 20:08, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Sfn1 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:55, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sfn1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. I do not know whether could be useful. Magioladitis (talk) 14:24, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete, or userfy, as I don't see a pressing need for it. Frietjes (talk) 21:40, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jax 0677 (talk) 05:25, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy or delete —PC-XT+ 05:42, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WattpadPH edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:55, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WattpadPH (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

template with a list of books endorsed by an online platform. Most of the titles are red links, unlinked or wrong links. Not useful at all. The Banner talk 07:46, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jax 0677 (talk) 05:25, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, full of redlinks or bad links, very few valid links to make navigation worthwhile. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:42, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Regbraces edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Regbraces (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I am the creator of this template, as a fork of Template:Braces. Later discovered that it functions the exact same way as Template:Tlf without <span class=nowrap>...</span> tags wrapping it. Long name and probably better named "Tlf-alt" or something anyway. No one's made Template:Tlf without nowrap yet, and I can't see why they would need it now. meteor_sandwich_yum (talk) 06:02, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete, seems we don't need it. Frietjes (talk) 21:40, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jax 0677 (talk) 05:25, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete (are we done?), I just wanted a second opinion. Wasn't really sure where to go from here but am perfectly okay with trashing it. Never used WP:TFD before. meteor_sandwich_yum (talk) 05:47, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Fellowship of the Ring edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:56, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fellowship of the Ring (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is completely redundant; all the links are already given in Template:The Lord of the Rings. Matt Deres (talk) 01:30, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jax 0677 (talk) 05:25, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the nom. --Izno (talk) 15:15, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Todo-buffy edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:54, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Todo-buffy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Another project specific fork of {{todo}}, used four times. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 08:52, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:39, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete after replacement. Frietjes (talk) 21:37, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jax 0677 (talk) 05:16, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/list edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was wrong venue Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:01, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/list (edit | talk | history | links | logs)

This is a project specific fork of {{todo}}, used only four times (now?) on Talk:Dartmoor , Talk:Northumberland , Talk:Cardiff and Talk:West Sussex; it doesnt add much, and to-do lists on the talk page shouldnt be project specific. Also worth mentioning is that there is a sandbox version of this template at Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/list/sandbox. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 08:38, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:38, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

wrong venue, better to discuss this at WP:MFD. Frietjes (talk) 21:37, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jax 0677 (talk) 05:16, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong venue per Frietjes —PC-XT+ 05:44, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Bolognia 2 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:55, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bolognia 2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. I guess it was used for substitution since references should not be given as templates. Magioladitis (talk) 23:09, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete, not used. Frietjes (talk) 21:38, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jax 0677 (talk) 05:16, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Goju Ryu edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:05, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Goju Ryu (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

A navbox consisting entirely of external links. Violates every navbox principle. (Is there a speedy deletion category that would cover this?) oknazevad (talk) 04:29, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, unless someone can basically remake it according to guidelines. I'll notify Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Martial arts in case someone there wants to give it a try... —PC-XT+ 05:54, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It is used in only a few articles - better just to delete it and allow for a fresh version in the future.Peter Rehse (talk) 09:58, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Oknazevad: You could CSD it under T2. Misrepresentation of policy db-t2 ► Philg88 ◄ ^talk 06:08, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- That's what I was looking for, thanks. But at this point, it'll just be deleted anyway in a day or so. oknazevad (talk) 06:06, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Summer camps in Oregon edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

I am left with no choice than withdraw the nomination (as nominator) as the problem stated does not exist any more. The Banner talk 22:03, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Summer camps in Oregon (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Fails WP:NENAN Not enough relevant links to camps. The Banner talk 00:43, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It's part of a larger group of templates found at Category:Outdoor recreation templates. BTW, I have filled in many of the links.--evrik ^(talk) 20:37, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.