Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 February 13

< February 12	February 14 >

February 13 edit

Template:ATWT history edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:55, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ATWT history (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused and almost all redirect links. Frietjes (talk) 22:20, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:AFT/Arrow diagram edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:55, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AFT/Arrow diagram (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 22:19, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:1995–96 Chicago Bulls season game log edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete after merging with the respective articles. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:46, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:1995–96 Chicago Bulls season game log (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:2008–09 Chicago Bulls playoff game log (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

single use templates, which per this discussion, should be merged with the article, then deleted. Frietjes (talk) 22:06, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge No point in single-use templates.—Bagumba (talk) 22:31, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:1970s All-NBA Team edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:56, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:1970s All-NBA Team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:1990s All-NBA Team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:2010s All-NBA Team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Category:All-NBA Team navigational boxes (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

after this discussion, the single year All-NBA Team templates were deleted here, and these decade versions were never deployed. suggesting we delete these, since there does not appear to be consensus to use them. Frietjes (talk) 21:54, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all Per consensus at WP:NBA discussion linked in the nomination. All templates are orphans. Fails WP:NAVBOX No. 5: "You would want to list many of these articles in the See also sections of the articles.".—Bagumba (talk) 22:29, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - we definitely had this conversation and I think these were just forgotten in the cleanup. Rikster2 (talk) 23:22, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. WP:NBA consensus was to eliminate these types of navboxes. Jrcla2 (talk) 14:37, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Various Manchester Metrolink templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:41, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Eccles line link (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Manchester-Ashton line link (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Unclear what the purpose is. Redrose64 (talk) 19:45, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unless the creator can give good explanation as to its purpose. An optimist on the run! 21:44, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - pretty sure its purpose is\was superceded by the S-rail templates. Simply south...... catching SNOWballs for just 6 years 22:34, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Songs for the Bhoys edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:40, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Songs for the Bhoys (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Sorry, I just don't see the usefulness of this one. Is this album really important enough that this collection of folk songs and football anthems should be tied together on articles? Not everything needs a navbox. BDD (talk) 19:00, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The article, Songs for the Bhoys, provides adequate navigation to the songs. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 20:00, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
delete Frietjes (talk) 23:53, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Sms edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge. Deleting any redirects can be considered at WP:RFD. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:59, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sms (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Hidden sort key (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Sms with Template:Hidden sort key.
Originally proposed here. Waldir ^talk 14:58, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

support, the major difference is that the {{sms}} template prefixes the sortkey with an & but given the low number of transclusions (under 50), we can fix those by hand before the redirect. there may be a good reason to just delete the sms template since sms has many meanings, but I have no strong opinion on that. Frietjes (talk) 16:38, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with conversion of current uses and otherwise incoming links followed by deletion. Question: is there an explanation for the &? --Waldir ^talk 17:45, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
as far as the & goes, I know {{nts}} and {{ntsh}} use it when sorting negative numbers to make them sort before the positive numbers. other than that, I don't know why it's needed here. if you look at {{sort}}, it doesn't use it. Frietjes (talk) 19:18, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 04:17, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
~~do not~~ Merge by redirecting, and stop. User:Frietjes is editing like this with es: "per the most probable outcome of this discussion"? Stop that. That is not a way to conclude and effectuate a discussion. -DePiep (talk) 22:37, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Frietjes is editing heavily by presumed outcome of this discussion. That is not the way we walk wp. Also, the change is not crucial. -DePiep (talk) 22:46, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See ANI. -DePiep (talk) 23:20, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What's your actual opinion, though? — This, that and the other (talk) 06:46, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You mean I am required to !vote? Anyway, you could start reading my first two words. -DePiep (talk) 10:44, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge I conclude, but it only takes a redirect. No other edits required, except for double redirects. -DePiep (talk) 11:15, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We don't need to maintain forks of general utility templates for such minor use cases. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 10:40, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Sonic cast edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:36, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sonic cast (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Another one in the same vein, largely created buy the same editor. oknazevad (talk) 04:29, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 16:40, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Supporting Autobots cast edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:34, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Supporting Autobots cast (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Exact same reason as the other one. Even worse, who's "main" and who's "supporting"? Its truly an indiscriminate judgement call. oknazevad (talk) 04:29, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 16:40, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Main Autobots cast edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:32, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Main Autobots cast (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Same as the TMNT one, goes against long-standing consensus, and is a random collection of actors who have never actually worked together. oknazevad (talk) 04:25, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 16:39, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles cast edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:30, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles cast (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per the long-standing consensus at Wikipedia:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers/Consensus summaries that actor navboxes shouldn't be made. Especially when this attempts to list actors who have nothing to do with each other as they appeared on different productions of the same property upwards of 20 years apart. oknazevad (talk) 04:17, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 16:39, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Simpsons clip shows edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:30, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Simpsons clip shows (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Clip shows are among the least notable episodes of any series, including The Simpsons. I don't see how this bit of simpsoncruft is necessary or useful for navigation. szyslak (t) 02:35, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 16:39, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.