Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 August 3

< August 2	August 4 >

August 3 edit

Template:Tercera División: Zona Centro edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:29, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tercera División: Zona Centro (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template is not used, has no categories and several red links. Unused since 2007. Alternative and updated template already exists at Template:Chilean Tercera División. MicroX (talk) 21:43, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Tercera División: Zona Norte edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:29, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tercera División: Zona Norte (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template is not used, has no categories and several red links. Unused since 2007. Alternative and updated template already exists at Template:Chilean Tercera División. MicroX (talk) 21:42, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Tercera División: Zona Centro-Sur edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:29, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tercera División: Zona Centro-Sur (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template is not used, has no categories and several red links. Unused since 2007. Alternative and updated template already exists at Template:Chilean Tercera División. MicroX (talk) 21:42, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Tercera División: Zona Sur edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:30, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tercera División: Zona Sur (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template is not used, has no categories and several red links. Unused since 2007. Alternative and updated template already exists at Template:Chilean Tercera División. MicroX (talk) 21:40, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Baltic Finns edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:31, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Baltic Finns (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Infobox Balts (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Infobox Celts (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Infobox Estonians (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Infobox Germanic peoples (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Infobox Iranian peoples (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Infobox Italic peoples (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Infobox Latvians (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Infobox Lithuanians (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Infobox Slavs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

recently created forks of the infoboxes in Baltic Finns, Balts, Celts, Estonians, etc.. Frietjes (talk) 16:37, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I never thought making infoboxes as templates would be controversial. The template Infobox Jews has existed for several years. Krakkos (talk) 16:48, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

that template is used in more than one article. single use templates are routinely merged and deleted. splitting the infobox from the article is pointless in these cases. Frietjes (talk) 18:02, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Subst then delete. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 00:29, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:YouTube personalities edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy deleted per CSD#G7. Bbb23 (talk) 23:37, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:YouTube personalities (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

An oversized template which appears to have selectively taken and categorised articles on List of YouTube personalities. We already have Category:YouTube and all its subcategories including Category:YouTube channels. Violates WP:NPOV, subjects are not connected (except using YouTube) doesn't seem to serve any additional purpose. Otterathome (talk) 13:05, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As the creator of this template, I do see reason in deleting it. I feel as if I shouldn't have made it, since it's a waste of space, and leaves about a bunch of other YouTube personalities. Therefore, I'm leaning towards delete (even though I created it). --Rhain1999 (talk) 13:22, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It was a good faith attempt to make a useful template, no harm done. You can add {{db-g7}} to it if you want it deleted today.--Otterathome (talk) 13:39, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – List of YouTube personalities is sufficient. Banhtrung1 (talk) 14:03, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Section OR edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus, the templates were never tagged, and the {{Section OR}} template is a simple frontend to {{Original research}}, so it's not clear what is being proposed. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:24, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Section OR (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Original research (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Section OR with Template:Original research.
There is absolutely no need for a separate template for a section. It can be merged to {{original research}}, where a 'section' parameter can be added. Insulam Simia (talk) 07:41, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per nominator – Both templates are overlap with the other. Banhtrung1 (talk) 14:05, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:UCLA All-Century edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:30, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:UCLA All-Century (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I can't find any reliable source for this All-Century team, nevertheless the article states it was a fan vote and not a media/expert based ballot, thus this fails template notability and usage guidelines as it clearly has no effect on the legacy of the player. Secret ^account 01:40, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete, no sources in UCLA Bruins football#All-Century UCLA Bruin Team to establish notability of this grouping. Frietjes (talk) 15:09, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox CHNNG edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:19, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox CHNNG (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Infobox Island Games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Infobox games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Infobox CHNNG and Template:Infobox Island Games with Template:Infobox games.
Merge into as a generic template. They are minor multi-sport events only. Banhtrung1 (talk) 13:59, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge redundant template into generic one, per nom. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 00:33, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox SEA Games event edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:19, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox SEA Games event (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Infobox Multi-sport competition event (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Infobox SEA Games event with Template:Infobox Multi-sport competition event.
SEA Games is a regional multi-sport event only. It's no need to create its own event infobox. Banhtrung1 (talk) 14:02, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge redundant template into generic one, per nom. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 00:31, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.