Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 September 21

< September 20	September 22 >

September 21

Template:Indianapolis shopping malls

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was redirect Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:34, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Indianapolis shopping malls (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

100% redundant to {{Shopping Malls in Indiana}}. Everything that's on that template is also on this one. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:47, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of course. Ego White Tray (talk) 03:10, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Project table

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:31, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Project table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Project line (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Intersect (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 17:36, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment {{intersect}} appears to be broken. -- 76.65.131.248 (talk) 03:22, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Rc-watch-closely

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Bbb23 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rc-watch-closely (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused experiment.Frietjes (talk) 17:13, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as db-author, per above rationale, thanks. Triona (talk) 23:11, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:ZAMonumentHeader

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:36, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ZAMonumentHeader (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:ZAMonumentRow (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 17:09, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Sputnikmusic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:37, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sputnikmusic (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

hard coded link to a review. Frietjes (talk) 17:07, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. While this could be turned into something general like {{allmusic}}, the source itself should only be used for staff reviews per Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Review sites. So I don't think there's much merit in keeping the name and the current template. De728631 (talk) 17:14, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not proves its usability; unnecessary template.--Malconfort (talk) 22:18, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:ME-disambiguation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:41, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ME-disambiguation (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This old talk page template has been superseeded by the practice of using WikiProject assessment templates. I have replaced all instances of the former with {{ME-project|class=dab}}, so "ME-disambiguation" is no longer needed. De728631 (talk) 16:59, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 17:37, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Image-cv

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:33, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Image-cv (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 16:56, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment it appears to be a substitution template -- 76.65.131.248 (talk) 03:29, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:ScienceAAAS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:34, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ScienceAAAS (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused and better to just use {{cite doi}}. Frietjes (talk) 16:40, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. And I didn't even know that there's this pretty awesome {{cite doi}}. De728631 (talk) 17:10, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I'm not a big fan of "cite doi", because it generates a separate page that is seldomly watched by anybody and therefore is an easy target for vandalism that might go undetected for a very long time. Better to just enter the doi into {{cite journal |doi=xxxxxxx}} and then run citationbot, which will fill in the template locally (and therefore any pagewatchers of that article will detect any vandalism immediately). --Guillaume2303 (talk) 12:13, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OT comment: Hrm, this collection of subpages is in fact unwieldy. De728631 (talk) 15:10, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment cite pmid has those as well... -- 76.65.131.248 (talk) 06:09, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cite pmid can be dealt with in the same way as I do with cite doi. Perhaps we should have a bot replace all these cite doi and cite pmid templates with filled-in cite journal templates. --Guillaume2303 (talk) 18:57, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps the DOI-bot and PMID-bot should instead do what you're doing manually (and another bot to do as you suggest to fix the current uses), since the template collections are all bot created. -- 76.65.131.248 (talk) 22:44, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Phs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was move to User:16@r/phs, if it's actually needed, feel free to move it back or elsewhere. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:29, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Phs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 16:39, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep usable for linking to page statistics for various discussions revolving around them. -- 76.65.131.248 (talk) 04:27, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Multiple stations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:27, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Multiple stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 16:38, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:FWCGroupTableLineG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:28, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FWCGroupTableLineG (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:FWCGroupTableLine (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 16:37, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:UniPers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy deletion (G7), requested by creator. De728631 (talk) 18:07, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:UniPers (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 16:35, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Titlelang

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:26, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Titlelang (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

looks like this was never adopted, perhaps since we are using some variant of {{lang}} directly now? Frietjes (talk) 16:34, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Screencast script table

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy deletion. Btw, {{db-user}} is for user pages, next time you might want to use {{db-author}}. De728631 (talk) 21:58, 21 September 2012 (UTC)}[reply]

Template:Screencast script table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 16:26, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've tagged it for {{db-user}}. If you'd just asked me, I could've done that without us needing an entry here... Good thing I watchlist! ;p —Quiddity (talk) 20:10, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:History Top-Class review

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:23, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:History Top-Class review (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:History A-Class review (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused (although it is a substituted template), no incoming links or documentation, so no indication that it is part of any active process. Frietjes (talk) 16:25, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:North Gwent Division 1 teamlist

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:39, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:North Gwent Division 1 teamlist (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 16:23, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Update current event

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:22, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Update current event (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 16:18, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment appears to be a specialized version of {{listdev}} for use with the Current Events Portal subpages -- 76.65.131.248 (talk) 11:12, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:MMA event fight

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:18, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MMA event fight (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 16:15, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Fb nc player1

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:15, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fb nc player1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 15:51, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:FB r MLS team

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:15, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FB r MLS team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 15:50, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Live Stod2sport

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, as they appear to be non-standard and orphaned. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:12, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Live Stod2sport (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Live SudurlandFM(ISL) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Lið Breiðablik (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Lið FH (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Lið Fram (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Lið Fylkir (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Lið Grindavík (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Lið KR (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Lið Keflavík (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Lið Selfoss (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Lið Stjarnan (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Lið Valur (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Lið Víkingur Ó. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Lið ÍA (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

replaced by standard text, or by a {{fb team}} template. Frietjes (talk) 15:36, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Indian railway station

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:45, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Indian railway station (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{Infobox station}}. Only 121 transclusions. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:04, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete, after replacement. Frietjes (talk) 23:41, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. A missing parameter which seems to apply specifically to mountainous countries is {{{elevation}}}. Perhaps this could be added as a courtesy and would preclude its addition when we try to merge custom station infoboxes from other countries where it matters. Also by including "style = Indian Railways" the custom look of this infobox would be retained. Secondarywaltz (talk) 04:06, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The optional elevation parameter would be a useful addition to the generic template; but that infoboxes on articles about one country's stations should have a different style to others is not a given. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:04, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- We might also want to add the architect parameter to the generic template. Some stations may have been designed by notable architects so that should be reflected in the box. De728631 (talk) 18:25, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - I agree; I'm surprised it isn't already there, frankly. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:40, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - I've been requesting {{{architect}}} for years :-) . . . and while your at it I am working on other merges, under the concept of Wikipedia:Infobox consolidation, that could use {{{re-opened}}} for stations on revived lines. Editors are currently making do with {{{rebuilt}}} which is just not the same. These are all on the talk page, but perhaps we didn't say "please" or process the request with the secret handshake. Secondarywaltz (talk) 20:43, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.