Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 March 9

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< March 8 March 10 >

March 9 edit


Template:Infobox rail line freight edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:50, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox rail line freight (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{Infobox rail line}}. Only ten transclusions. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:24, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - seems redundant to me. Some lines even name stations. Secondarywaltz (talk) 00:31, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox mode of mechanical ventilation edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox mode of mechanical ventilation (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:21, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, seems like a WP:CSD#G2/test page. nonfunctional "infobox" --> delete. mabdul 22:02, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete—as an unneeded test page. Imzadi 1979 → 12:25, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Kartavya edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Kartavya (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphan. I replaced the only instance with {{Infobox organisation}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:04, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Korean museum edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Korean museum (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{Infobox museum}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:37, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, which one was it? Maybe it is worth to "copy and paste" the code of the 4 Korean language codes like it was done at {{infobox station}}. mabdul 21:55, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Vgtrpg-chrono edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:50, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Vgtrpg-chrono (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Completely redundant to {{RPVG Chronology}}. Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 16:33, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, per nom. mabdul 21:50, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I don't think it will be at all obvious to the reader that the dates in the navbox below correspond directly to the list in question. Also, I'd like the Table of Contents to be at the top of the page where it cannot be missed, as per other list articles. SharkD  Talk  01:29, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • It's not a TOC: it's a navbox. That's an annoyance in itself. At the very least this needs transmogrified into a {{sidebar}}, but given that it's completely redundant even that seems unnecessary. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 10:36, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete—redundant per Chris Cunningham. Imzadi 1979 → 12:24, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep. Lots of things are redundant but helpful anyway. On big pages, having the similar navboxes on top & bottom is harmless and fine. SnowFire (talk) 02:34, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete as redundant to the navbox at the bottom of the lists. Frietjes (talk) 23:46, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:TOCRQSports edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TOCRQSports (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Subst and delete Only used on two pages (one of them is repository of ToC templates). Not useful for any other page. Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 16:30, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:38, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst and delete I originally created this to remove clutter from the requested sports articles page. The code has since been simplified, thus making it somewhat redundant, as it serves no use elsewhere. SFB 18:03, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox invention edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox invention (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single use; unnecessary. SUBST, remove, or replace with a better template? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:29, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:TOCRFCU edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TOCRFCU (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Completely redundant to {{Compact ToC}} and could easily replaced by {{CompactTOC|short1|num=yes|refs=no}}. Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 16:28, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox industrial park edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox industrial park (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Was singe-use, now orphaned (I SUBSTd it). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:42, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, seems no useful, all industry parks I had seen were using template company or other ones. mabdul 21:27, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete—orphaned and redundant to infobox company. Imzadi 1979 → 12:26, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Republican Party presidential primaries, 2012 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Jenks24 (talk) 08:47, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Republican Party presidential primaries, 2012 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Subst and delete Only used on one article and no potential use on any other. Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 13:14, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Origin of International cricketers edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Origin of International cricketers (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Pointless navbox that only navigates one article. Jenks24 (talk) 13:02, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Even if this was rolled out to every international cricketer's biography page, it is totally redundant to Categories, and unlike Cats, clutters up the article without offering any extra navigational utility (which would be the point of this kind of template) --Dweller (talk) 13:31, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Dweller extra999 (talk) 16:15, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, useless at the moment and I think that there won't be the related articles in the next few months. mabdul 20:35, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The related articles all already exist (thousands of them). We have an article on every cricketer who has ever played international cricket - it's just that this template has not yet (thankfully) been widely deployed. --Dweller (talk) 06:58, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Correct - so, I change my opinion to !delete per Dweller: redundant to cats. mabdul 03:47, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Per nom, besides which, even if there were more articles linking from it, it would still be pointless. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 21:37, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:5RoundBracket-byes-2end edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:5RoundBracket-byes-2end (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template. Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 12:45, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:NBASeasonTOC edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:49, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NBASeasonTOC (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:NBASeasonTOC2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:NHLSeasonTOC (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Hardcoded tables of contents used boilerplate-style on NBA / NFL season articles. Replacing it with {{TOC limit|2}} on each of the transclusions would result in articles having a regular-format TOC of a sensible length which didn't selectively omit top-level headings (thus discouraging a less rigid format for these articles, which should be encouraged in the name of good prose). Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 11:55, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, totally redundant and bad coded. mabdul 13:31, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Judaeo-Christian Creation edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:07, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Judaeo-Christian Creation (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Under G7; I am the only author, and through inattention allowed it to "escape" my userspace before finished. St John Chrysostom Δόξατω Θεώ 05:40, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2012_March_9&oldid=1138535867"