Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 March 8

March 8

edit


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete. Original author has requested deletion.--v/r - TP 03:44, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Afc warning (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

was created for a bot task (Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Snotbot 8) which is withdrawn - so unused and orphaned. mabdul 18:44, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 12:09, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Category TOC numerals (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

trivial hard-coded instance of {{category TOC}}. Should be substituted on existing pages. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 15:18, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Template does not exist. If the template linked contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT 13:51, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Category TOC exists (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and unclear purpose. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 13:20, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's why users have talk pages. Rich Farmbrough, 13:27, 8 March 2012 (UTC).[reply]
Apologies. I see this has been userfied, so the nom is moot. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 13:36, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:35, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Category TOC numeric (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

hardcoded instance of {{category TOC}} used on a handful of category pages. The code is simple enough to include directly, so recommend substitution. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 12:48, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 12:09, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Category year TOC (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Hardcoded category TOC which isn't actually used on any categories. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 12:37, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 12:09, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SubTOC (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Used on a single project page and only a handful of the links are filled in. I've replaced the implementation with a call to {{CompactTOC8}}: the single transclusion can now be substituted. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 11:45, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.