Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 March 13

< March 12	March 14 >

March 13

Template:Infobox Verband

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G6 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Verband (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not in English. Purpose not clear. Unused. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:08, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Thomas Jouannet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. It was close, those flashing images were so hypnotic, but, snowball this puppy gone. Skier Dude (talk) 00:39, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Thomas Jouannet (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template consisting mostly of redlinks, for a barely notable actor, with a lot of non-MOS compliant stuff. Drmies (talk) 19:51, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the redlinks are not useful, and the images are just ridiculous. LadyofShalott 20:22, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, and please file some FFDs for those files. 0_o Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:30, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All redlinks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:35, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, that is totally not how you do a navbox. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:06, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
SNOWBALL delete as above. Or perhaps transclude to MySpace. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:23, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Props for the ASCII art though, lol -- œ ^™ 23:49, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete—and then please send the graphics over to FfD as necessary. Imzadi 1979 → 04:57, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a nonfunctional and unencyclopedic navbox, though I'm very tempted to stick some of those graphics in Wikipedia space somewhere. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:09, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment--I hadn't even clicked on the "show" links. This is truly something. Drmies (talk) 21:18, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete the template and the files linked in it that aren't flagicons. Good lord, that is ludicrious... rdfox 76 (talk) 18:05, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:All The Day Holiday

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete with no issues of recreation if redlinked articles are created Skier Dude (talk) 00:43, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:All The Day Holiday (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only navigates to the artist page and their only album. Even without the template, one will be able to navigate quite easily between the two. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 18:06, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom; template navigates very few articles (WP:NENAN). Gongshow ^Talk 17:05, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unlikely that there will be more articles in near future. mabdul 13:39, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Image gallery

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete after replacing with {{gallery}}. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:43, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Image gallery (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated, redundant to {{Gallery}}. 561 transclusions will have to be replaced. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:41, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:22, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete—redundant. Imzadi 1979 → 04:58, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per functionality. Krenakarore ^TK 00:32, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Question can you please elaborate? What is the incentive to have both of these rather than one? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:04, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment specify "both of these" Krenakarore ^TK 02:20, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Response I mean, why do we need both templates mentioned in my nomination? Why won't one of them do? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:28, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per duplicity. Krenakarore ^TK 11:56, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Redundant. The more general {{Gallery}} template does everything that {{Image gallery}} does, and more. Can a 'bot handle the conversion? I see that the {{Image gallery}} template has already been marked as deprecated and users are being directed to use {{Gallery}} instead. Actually, I don't like either template, as they use nested frames, waste screen space and look unnecessarily busy; I prefer using <gallery></gallery> tag pairs instead in most instances. — Quicksilver^{T @} 04:12, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, redundant. (maybe we should delete both in favor of the gallery tags) mabdul 13:48, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, save until articles are converted to other format. Abrupt deletion could damage hundreds of pages. Fotaun (talk) 20:09, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Main Page discussion header

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was mark as historical Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:52, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Main Page discussion header (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated, unused. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:33, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. May have some historical worth. -- œ ^™ 23:45, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Historify then or Keep. Why waste our time with this one? Rich Farmbrough, 15:14, 19 March 2012 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox National University of Sciences and Technology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:48, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox National University of Sciences and Technology (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{Infobox university}}; only 12 transclusions. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:30, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete—redundant. Imzadi 1979 → 04:55, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, totally redundant. mabdul 14:18, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Speedlight

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no csonensus to delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:54, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Speedlight (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single use, on article tagged for merging. Named for a single product-range. Last edited May 2008. subst, or replace with something else? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:13, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do not subst much as reducing the number of Infobox templates is generally a good thing (unlike miscellaneous templates where it's generally a waste of time), better to have a one user than a subst'd infobox. Rich Farmbrough, 15:12, 19 March 2012 (UTC).[reply]
Keep and populate: Category:Flash_photography has enough articles with potential uses. mabdul 14:51, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox orthography

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was redirect to {{Infobox writing system}}. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:04, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox orthography (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single use, last edited in 2009. subst, or replace with something else? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:43, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge back to {{Infobox writing system}}. Rich Farmbrough, 15:02, 19 March 2012 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox IIHFWW

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:07, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox IIHFWW (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant fork of {{Infobox International Ice Hockey Competition}}; only 15 transclusions. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:35, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete after moving those 15 transclusions to {{Infobox International Ice Hockey Competition}}. Based on talk page it was designed to change the national team template links to point to the women's team rather than the men's. That functionality now exists in the main template. Reso lute 16:20, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete—redundant. (Orphaning a template is a housekeeping step encompassed in the result to delete a template in a situation like this.) Imzadi 1979 → 04:53, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy this Rich Farmbrough, 15:13, 19 March 2012 (UTC).[reply]
Delete, redundant. mabdul 17:42, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox RTA Bus Route

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:14, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox RTA Bus Route (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single use. Redundant to {{Infobox bus line}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:11, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete—redundant. Imzadi 1979 → 04:54, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merge quickly Rich Farmbrough, 15:10, 19 March 2012 (UTC).[reply]
15:10, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Delete, totally redundant, nothing to merge! mabdul 17:44, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2006 LOS PHS TOC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:19, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2006 LOS PHS TOC (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to the now-standard footer format used in {{2006 Pacific hurricane season buttons}}, which is included on this template's one transclusion. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 11:48, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:13, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You could have speedied this I think. Rich Farmbrough, 15:08, 19 March 2012 (UTC).[reply]
'Subst and delete. mabdul 17:50, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Alpha index

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, can be restored if someone is actually using it. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:17, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Alpha index (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused boilerplate constructor. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 11:39, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:13, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment how can you tell if it is unused? And couldn't this be integrated into one of the article wizards? 70.49.126.147 (talk) 05:53, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
'Keep per IP it's a substed template. I can see it saving someone a lot of time. Rich Farmbrough, 15:09, 19 March 2012 (UTC).[reply]
Delete, seems not really used (google) and I can't immagine how this can be included in the wizard. (active member, never seen a list which was approved) mabdul 17:55, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:ToC2004Atlantichurricaneseason

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:15, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ToC2004Atlantichurricaneseason (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{2004 Atlantic hurricane season buttons}}, which is included in the footer of its one transclusion in the now universally-prevalent style for storm articles. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 11:33, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:13, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:PseudoHeading

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Skier Dude (talk) 00:55, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PseudoHeading (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No longer used: obviated by improvements in TOC technology. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 11:30, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:13, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as redundant. Davnor (talk) 14:42, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete—redundant. Imzadi 1979 → 04:54, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.