Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 June 3

June 3 edit

Template:Courage the Cowardly Dog edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:21, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Courage the Cowardly Dog (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Nominating myself for deletion. Navigates two articles. WP:NENAN. JJ98 (Talk) 22:53, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You nominated it for deletion here, you were the only author so it was deleted speedily as an author requested deletion so this discussion was closed. You then recreate it barely 24 hours after. What is going on? Woody (talk) 09:21, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, does not have enough links, and the logo is entirely unncessary. Frietjes (talk) 22:50, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Links only three articles, un-needed. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 05:10, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete not needed. Woody (talk) 11:53, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Hi Hi Puffy AmiYumi edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn (WP:NAC). JJ98 (Talk) 05:23, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hi Hi Puffy AmiYumi (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navigates four articles. WP:NENAN. JJ98 (Talk) 22:52, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Actually navigates six articles, so meets the guideline. Doh5678 Talk 15:57, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I see no reason why the template cannot be redirected to Template:Puffy AmiYumi; all of the articles are already linked there. G.A.Stalk 04:40, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:23, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navigates four articles. WP:NENAN. Most of the articles merged due to its notability. JJ98 (Talk) 22:50, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep as it has been around quite a while, and it might be useful again. I would have no objection to removing it from the articles though as it's basically redundant with the links in the pages. Soap 00:30, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Navagates five articles not four, useful navbox here. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 19:17, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, links creators, awards and episodes. All are very well linked naturally through the articles. Frietjes (talk) 22:52, 9 June 2011 (UTC) two more links have been added, so I am now indifferent. Frietjes (talk) 15:30, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:ND Schedule Entry edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 06:29, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ND Schedule Entry (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:ND Schedule Start (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:ND Schedule End (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

duplication of template:CFB Schedule Entry just for Notre Dame. Frietjes (talk) 22:20, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:OrganicBox hbond donor edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 06:30, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:OrganicBox hbond donor (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:OrganicBox hbond acceptor (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Style OrganicBoxTD 2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

old and unused. Frietjes (talk) 21:17, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think that all three templates can be deleted. --Leyo 08:03, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have now added {{OrganicBox hbond acceptor}}. Thank you. Frietjes (talk) 23:57, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cons-ser (IRL) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deleted Skier Dude (talk) 00:52, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cons-ser (IRL) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

no clear purpose. Frietjes (talk) 20:48, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

User:Werdnabot/Interface/Oldsyntax edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy close, please re-create at WP:MFDThe Helpful One 16:38, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User:Werdnabot/Interface/Oldsyntax (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Werdnabot isn't running for 2 years now and this template was used after rewrite. ATM hasn't any transclusions... mabdul 20:34, 3 June 2011 (UTC) mabdul 20:34, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

speedy close, userpages go to WP:MFD. Frietjes (talk) 20:48, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:VC recipients by name edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deleted Skier Dude (talk) 00:54, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:VC recipients by name (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All of the constituent articles have been merged now into three separate lists. This template is now orphaned as a result and is only made up of redirects. Woody (talk) 19:52, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Fb team Vestmannaeyjar edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus, part of a larger series. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:26, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fb team Vestmannaeyjar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is just a link. A template is not required for this. Oddbodz (talk) 17:32, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:LOVE (Cirque du Soleil) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 06:32, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:LOVE (Cirque du Soleil) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navigates seven articles, several of which (e.g. George Martin) only have a tenuous association with the main topic. The three or four that do can easily be linked to one another. —Justin (koavf)TCM☯ 05:50, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, link between articles is too tenuous. Frietjes (talk) 22:54, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Noise-anime edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep as expanded Skier Dude (talk) 00:59, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Noise-anime (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navigates three articles. More WP:NENAN cruft. JJ98 (Talk) 05:43, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment This template links four articles, not three. A fifth article, List of Aoi Hana episodes, should also be linked from the template. List of Aoi Hana chapters could also be linked if the template is intended to cover all articles related to the series adapted into anime in the Noise programming block, though that article relates to the manga and not the anime adaptation. Calathan (talk) 13:08, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep With a potential of six articles to link here it passes WP:NENAN. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 16:04, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, with the addition of the list of characters, it is enough. Frietjes (talk) 22:54, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Wedding Peach edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:02, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wedding Peach (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navigates two articles. WP:NENAN. JJ98 (Talk) 05:35, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment This template links four articles, not two. Calathan (talk) 13:02, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Nonsense navbox here, other than the title and author there are two articles which should be merged or placed up for WP:AFD. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 17:26, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete perhaps if there were more than four articles, it'd be reasonable. However, it looks like at least one of those four is up for deletion, so the box will be even emptier. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 00:37, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Trigun edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:00, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Trigun (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navigates two articles. WP:NENAN. JJ98 (Talk) 05:35, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:ToHeart series edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:59, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ToHeart series (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navigates two articles. WP:NENAN. JJ98 (Talk) 05:34, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment This template links three articles, not two. There is also a fourth article, List of To Heart episodes, that should be linked from the template but currently isn't. Calathan (talk) 12:56, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The template was not even being used in the main article Toheart, all the info in this navbox can be found in the article. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 15:51, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Red Garden edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:56, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Red Garden (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navigates three articles. WP:NENAN. JJ98 (Talk) 04:23, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Navigates just two articles now as the list of characters was just a redirect. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 17:03, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Hell Girl edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:55, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hell Girl (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navigates three articles. WP:NENAN. JJ98 (Talk) 04:22, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment This template links four articles, not three. Calathan (talk) 12:51, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete All three links in nav box are easily reachable on the article. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 16:57, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Burn-Up edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:52, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Burn-Up (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navigates three articles. WP:NENAN. JJ98 (Talk) 04:21, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Fairy Tail edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:49, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fairy Tail (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navigates three articles. WP:NENAN. JJ98 (Talk) 04:20, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment This template links five articles, not three. Calathan (talk) 12:49, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Although there are five linbks to the articles all the info appears within reach on one page, I do not see this navbox needed. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 16:52, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Project A-ko edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:48, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Project A-ko (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navigates four articles. WP:NENAN. JJ98 (Talk) 04:19, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment This template links five articles, not four. Calathan (talk) 12:47, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Navbox is useful in this case as there is no central article present. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 16:06, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep there is enough here. Frietjes (talk) 22:57, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:PuellaMagi edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:46, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PuellaMagi (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navigates two articles. WP:NENAN. JJ98 (Talk) 04:17, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment This template links four articles, not two (though I'm not sure if Shaft should actually be linked). Calathan (talk) 12:45, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Only two things in Navbox are easily within reach in the article. Article needs work though. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 15:46, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The template was created prematurely. The series is still fairly young, and there are not that many more articles that can be created at this time. If Madoka proves to be influential, an article on her (and only her) may be created in the future, and there might be another article on the upcoming slice of life version (or at least an episode list). A film could be created, or video games based on the series. But until then, the template doesn't really make it easier to navigate among a few articles.-- 20:20, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:FLCL edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:42, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FLCL (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navigates three articles. This navbox template appears to be WP:NENAN. JJ98 (Talk) 02:47, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - This template links four articles (FLCL, the list of episodes, the list of characters, and the discography). Calathan (talk) 12:41, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I have added a soundtracks section on the article, everythinbg that is in the navbox already now appears to be easily within reach in the article for the reader. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 15:41, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.