Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 November 8

< November 7	November 9 >

November 8 edit

Template:Volkswagen 2007 models edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:31, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Volkswagen 2007 models (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete - Unused, model templates should not be for a single model year. Vossanova ^o< 16:05, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Seems unnecessary. --Bsherr (talk) 03:44, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unnecessary, no need for a template for a single model year. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 09:28, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Title Templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Merge Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:33, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bracketed (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Hash (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Namespace conflict (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All three could be replaced by a single template with a reason parameter and that template is called {{Correct title}}. Already updated the transclusions of {{Bracketed}} and {{Namespace conflict}} a few weeks ago and not had any complaints. WOSlinker (talk) 13:40, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seems reasonable, and the combined template provides a clearer message than the specialized ones anyway.--Kotniski (talk) 13:54, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Seems like a perfectly reasonable proposal to me. PC78 (talk) 16:07, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Clearly a better name. Vegaswikian (talk) 20:21, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge – I support the proposal. Seems more convenient. --Bsherr (talk) 03:42, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom — OwenBlacker (Talk) 22:20, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support, sure, per nom. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 09:29, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support, per nom. —Voidxor (talk | contrib) 22:51, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.