Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 November 7

< November 6	November 8 >

November 7 edit

Template:New York Titans roster edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 18:08, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:New York Titans roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Orlando Titans roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

These templates used to contain the current roster of National Lacrosse League teams that no longer exist. MrBoo (talk, contribs) 12:30, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no use for templates if there are no longer going to be current rosters. -DJSasso (talk) 14:32, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as said above, I don't think there'll be any good use for this. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 16:21, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Footballer display edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 06:29, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Footballer display (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused wrapper-style template. Everyone just seems to be using the templates directly, so no need for a wrapper. WOSlinker (talk) 13:47, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedied. Something that never got off the ground (and it wasn't a wrapper in that sense...). Will re-create if needed. Rich Farmbrough, 18:19, 7 November 2010 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Merlin - Series 2 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:47, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Merlin - Series 2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All but one of these links redirect to List of Merlin episodes, which has been added to {{Merlin}}, which has replaced the single transclusion of this template, which is now unused. _Xeworlebi ^(talk) 12:54, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Appears episodes from that template were redirected to episode list by ChaosMaster16. Not sure why the one episode you mention was not. Although the redirecting user was blocked I find the redirects reasonable on notability grounds. Delete this template with no prejudice for recreation iff notable episode articles with more than plot are recreated (which seems unlikely). Rambo's Revenge (talk) 18:57, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Merlin - Series 1 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:48, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Merlin - Series 1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All of these links redirect to List of Merlin episodes, also this template is used nowhere. _Xeworlebi ^(talk) 12:43, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Appears episodes from that template were redirected to episode list by ChaosMaster16. Although the redirecting user was blocked I find the redirects reasonable on notability grounds. Delete this template with no prejudice for recreation iff notable episode articles with more than plot are recreated (which seems unlikely). Rambo's Revenge (talk) 18:57, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Pages Created edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was userfied to User:Jvcdude/Pages Created Peter Karlsen (talk) 16:56, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pages Created (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template with a pretty generic name, in templatespace, appears to hard-list one user's creations. Sounds like a good candidate to be moved into userspace or deleted. Jclemens (talk) 05:20, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - If it was in use then I would have said userfy but since it's not, delete would do. -- WOSlinker (talk) 12:32, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy anyway Would be acceptable in user space, harmless to put it there, and the user might want it (if not then they can just WP:U1 it). --N Y Kevin @282, i.e. 05:46, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy per NYKevin. Samwb123^T-C-E 15:11, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:OilersOwner edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete, perhaps setting precedent for other similar templates like {{BCLionsOwner}} and {{AlsOwner}} Rambo's Revenge (talk) 18:19, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:OilersOwner (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Targets have next to nothing to do with each other, and therefore does not aid navigation. Probably isn't even worthy of a list on Edmonton Oilers, so there's no reason for an entire template. –Schmloof (talk · contribs) 01:11, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as it does not aid navigation. -DJSasso (talk) 02:53, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. ʘ alaney2k ʘ (talk) 18:00, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 15:00, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.--Mo Rock...Monstrous (talk) 23:47, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Boston Bruins staff edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 18:08, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Boston Bruins staff (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Can easily be summarized on Boston Bruins; also, most positions on this list don't assert notability, to say nothing of the titleholders. –Schmloof (talk · contribs) 01:07, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as it does not aid navigation and filled with people that don't seem to be notable. -DJSasso (talk) 02:54, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It was only created originally as a counterpart to an existing Staff template on a Pens season thread. As the original template that served as inspiration has since been deleted, it stands to reason that this should follow suit. Alrin (talk) 12:06, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this would have to be added/removed from all new staff pages to be a "good" navbox, and it isn't being. (Notability of items is not strictly relevant, unless a red-link is being kept, items can be unlinked or linked to sections.) Rich Farmbrough, 18:36, 7 November 2010 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. Not useful as a navbox, and such information could be conveyed in the team's season articles without the need for what is ultimately a single use template given the level of turnover in sports. Reso lute 05:45, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. ʘ alaney2k ʘ (talk) 18:02, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete exactly per nom. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 15:00, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.--Mo Rock...Monstrous (talk) 23:46, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.