Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 61

Archive 55

←

Archive 59

Archive 60

Archive 61

Archive 62

Archive 63

→

Archive 65

Northern Lightz

• Northern Lightz · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Page deleted due to "lack of notability". However, pages for the preceding and suceeding related Scottish underground comics "Electric Soup" and "Wasted (Scottish Comic)" have remained, leaving the latter as an orphan article. The reason I created the wiki entries for Northern Lightz and Wasted comics (the Electric Soup entry already existed) was to clear up confusion between these three related but distinct titles, which often occurs in poorly researched online material. In my opinion, the usefulness of the entries for both Electric Soup and Wasted are compromised by the lack of a Northern Lightz entry, it being the missing link between the two in the development of Scottish underground comics. ab -92.26.123.69 (talk) 13:38, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Cmprince (talk), who proposed it, in case s/he wishes to consider nominating it at WP:Articles for deletion. All these three are short on references, which they need for WP:Verifiability as well as WP:Notability - can you dig up any more refs? JohnCD (talk) 14:38, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Systems Security Certified Practitioner

• Systems Security Certified Practitioner · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

speedy G11'd. Content is not pure promo Paleking (talk) 20:51, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Not done This was a promotional blurb for the subject matter; there was literally not a single "reference" that was not a reference back to the (ISC)² website: not a one. --Orange Mike | Talk 23:59, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

David Charles (Physician)

• David Charles (physician) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Hello, I would like to have this article restored so that I may update it with more current information pertaining to Dr. David Charles. I am not entirely sure why it was deleted in the first place (I do not believe that it violated any of the speedy deletion criteria). Wikipedia says that the article titled David Charles (Physician) was deleted by/due to PROD which I hope means that it can be restored. Thank you very much in advance! -Azeresen (talk) 21:36, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 22:11, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. The article basically said, "he's a professor at Vandy." That's not an assertion of notability. --Orange Mike | Talk 23:54, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Sean Zarinegar Travels America

• Sean Zarinegar Travels America · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

I followed the directions (below):

edit the page remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}} save the page

And, yet, the article "Sean Zarinegar Travels America" was still deleted. The reason for the deletion given was:

"This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia."

There is no field on an any Wikipedia page that requires or allows for the writer of the article to "indicate how or why the subject is important or significant."

In fact, the words "this subject is important or significant because..." do not exist on any Wikipedia page, including the founder Jimmy Wales' Wikipedia page.

The deletion was unjust, wrong and illogical. -LosAngelesWriter (talk) 00:41, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

•  Not done This article went through a community deletion discussion in November, and was deleted accordingly. If you have read WP:FIRSTARTICLE, or even more importantly the 5 Pillars of Wikipedia (both of which were recommended and made available to you when you first signed up to this project), you will understand notability/significance and verifiability are key to an encyclopedia article (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 00:51, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Hotez2.jpg

• File:Hotez2.jpg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

picture was already updated with copyright info -Neinman (talk) 02:27, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

It was marked "for informational purposes only" (not an acceptable restriction); there was no license; and the picture was replaceable. --Orange Mike | Talk 02:33, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

(ISC)²

• (ISC)² · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

deletion decision is need of discussion -89super (talk) 16:17, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Done The article had been speedily deleted as advertising or promotion. The initial stub had been plastered over with stuff from the organization itself, but deletion may have been over the top. Taking into account also the subsequent Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Certified Information Systems Security Professional, I've restored the initial stub, but without prejudice against further discussion of its merits or a merge. --Tikiwont (talk) 22:15, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

convergence indexing

• Convergence indexing · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

originally deemed non-notable, but thousands of hits on Google on this subject -91.154.30.128 (talk) 03:41, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

 Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 15:59, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Jesse Venbrux

• Jesse_Venbrux · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

He is a notable person -NicK 04:20, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

•  Not done Although they may or may not be notable, all biographies of living persons must be supported by valid reliable sources. Indeed, all articles must be. This article appeared to have been original research by someone close to the subject, as opposed to an encyclopedic article. You're welcome to create a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT at some point when reliable sources become available (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 09:58, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

File:DF Brown.jpeg

• File:DF Brown.jpeg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Under deletion on commons -Bulwersator (talk) 15:43, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

• It would be deleted here too as no evidence that sfweekly has given permission. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:36, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

bushiroad

• Bushiroad · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

wasn't finished -Bloope (talk) 16:49, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

supposedly didn't have any significant ingormation

• Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. This article was deleted in November - all articles must meet Wikipedia standards for inclusion when they are created. The reasoning does not state "any significant information", it states that there was no assertion of the significance of the company. Wikipedia is not a business directory, it's an encyclopedia (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 16:55, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Cyanotic_(band)

• Cyanotic_(band) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I see no reason why this page was deleted, as Cyanotic (based in the US) is still making music, touring with many acts in the industrial/coldwave/glitchcore scene. There was once a band called Cyanotic (based in Canada), but they are no longer together or have since changed names, and should not be confused. -Snum (talk) 19:10, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

• Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:33, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Calypto Design Systems

• Calypto Design Systems · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because Calypto Design Systems is a company and a few of its products are on Wikipedia. Notably Catapult C. Calypto's primary Shareholder Mentor Graphics is on wikipedia as well. There are numerous articles that pertain to Calypto. Such as: http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4219348/Calypto-acquires-Mentor-s-Catapult-C http://news.glam.ac.uk/news/en/2012/jan/19/glamorgan-signs-3000000-sponsorship-deal/ http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-blogs/other/4234693/Predictions-for-2012--ESL http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/Calypto-Partners-With-AcconSys-Provide-Sales-Support-Its-Electronic-System-Level-1598812.htm http://low-powerdesign.com/leibson_blog.htm http://video.eetimes.com/playlist-video/eet-livestream/959364312001/calypto-announces-extensions-to-powerpro-software-tool/983536322001 -Mathildegold (talk) 19:27, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

 Note: You cannot argue for undeletion based upon the existence of similar articles. All articles must independently satisfy our notability policies. In any case, this page is not yet deleted; you need to use a {{hangon}} tag and take it to the article's talk page. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 19:52, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

If you can find claims of importance and reasons for notability you can recreate the article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:32, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

liz hatch

• Liz Hatch · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

reasoning -198.209.9.11 (talk) 19:56, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 20:00, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

• Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:32, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

DroidDevelop

• DroidDevelop · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:DroidDevelop -DarkGoodWIN (talk) 10:20, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user Y (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 10:39, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

I wrote to mr Y next letter around week ago:

"Hello. My article about DroidDevelop was deleted. Main purpose of this article publication - writing about Android application development on the Android devices with correct apk file as result.

At last year I many time try to find any application to programming on my tablet in the public transportation and found for me only JavaIDEDroid. But this application was not usability for me and I wrote DroidDevelop.

In the article "Android software development" supposedly exists all of the main ways of Android programming. But only desktop programming ways or Basic interpreters (including commercial) contains in this.

Last month I add several lines to illustrating this type of programming (see DroidDevelop part on the "http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Android_software_development&oldid=467177167"). This was removed as spam. I don't understand why, but ok, this is not my article and some people can delete any information without offer an alternative.

But this is separate article which illustrate program for Java programing on the Android operating system. An other similar program I can't find on the wikipedia. Do you ignoring this theme in principle?"

But I don't have any answer. What's I need to doing? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DarkGoodWIN (talk • contribs) 13:37, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

No themes are ignored on principle, but you seem to have difficulty t write about the topic in the right way for this website. Most peole with a COI have the same problem. More on your talk page. --Tikiwont (talk) 10:57, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Paul Sutera

• Paul Sutera · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

He is best known as Peter Brady of Brady Bunch movies. I wonder if deletion must be undone. Look at statistics. Nevertheless, if he is not notable enough to pass either WP:GNG or any other notability-related guideline, then this must be a redirect to List of The Brady Bunch characters#Peter Brady. -George Ho (talk) 07:04, 3 February 2012 (UTC) I wonder if this URL helps determine notability: http://www.dailynebraskan.com/news/mtv-s-busted-to-air-students-broken-up-bash-1.1128472 --George Ho (talk) 07:12, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Well you proposed it for deletion yourself. How about creating the redirect first and come back here once you're clear about whether or not to restore? --Tikiwont (talk) 22:38, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Eh... unless you answer whether he passes WP:GNG and/or WP:BIO, I can't do that yet. I don't want to make any more revisions; history log saves revisions which are a lot of bytes. --George Ho (talk) 01:00, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Not done As you're not confirming that right now you want this to be undeleted which is the only purpose of this board. --Tikiwont (talk) 10:46, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Terence Hildner

• Terence Hildner · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

apparently this was deleted a couple months ago. In light of recent death, is there anything notable from the earlier article that can be added to the new one? -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 02:00, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

I have restored the old history (see here for the last revision). Cheers, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 05:09, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 08:46, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Turns out the jerk taking ownership of the article doesn't want any of that in his article. Nuts to him. Last time I request an undeletion on someone else's stuff.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 09:27, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

•  Done ... and User:Kintetsubuffalo warned about WP:NPA (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 23:22, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Bilal Khan (Singer)

• Bilal Khan (Singer) · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I have the copyrights from the owner. - Sabeel Hussain  ^talk 04:20, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

 Not done. We can't restore on the basis that you say you have permission - it requires a formal copyright release, see WP:Donating copyrighted materials if you own the copyright or WP:Requesting copyright permission if someone else does. But I don't recommend doing that, because that material is too promotional in tone and doesn't show that he meets the requirements of WP:MUSICBIO. JohnCD (talk) 10:29, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

FPSRussia

• FPSRussia · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Frequently accessed page. Deleted due to G11, but should have opportunity for content improvement rather than deletion. -Drocra (talk) 22:57, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

• Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.. Wholly promotional, Batman (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 23:24, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Thrive (film)

• Thrive (film) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

I am surprised that this article was deleted from Wikipedia. I just watched the movie and wanted to get some more background information. I was really surprised that Wikipedia does not contain an article about this movie. In fact, the article was deleted 3 days ago. I read in the deletion discussion that some people were not fully happy with the contents of the page. I cannot judge this argument as i have never seen the page. Nevertheless, it did not look clear to me that a deletion decision was formally taken using the Wikipedia processes (but i'm not too familiar with those). Anyways, deleting the entire page instead of just removing the controversial parts just has a "funny smell" to it (not implying anything funny happened, could just be over-eager housekeeping IMHO), especially if you take the stuff the movie talks about into account. I would suggest to restore at least a basic page about the movie. Sorry if this is in any way the wrong form or wording for this kind of request, i am just an ordinary netizen not usually involved with Wikipedia. -31.11.9.159 (talk) 01:46, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

• " Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thrive (film), it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Fram (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. However since the AFD was almost a no consensus and events will have changed rapidly for this recently released film, if you can find significant coverage in reliable sources you could have a new article based on that. I understand as a reader you may not be interested in writing this article though! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:29, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Old Dutch.gif

• File:Old Dutch.gif · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I haven't been around for a few months, but it looks like this was deleted in my absence due to "lacking authorship information." It's the Old Dutch cleanser logo and is from an Old Dutch cleanser advertisement from, if I recall correctly no longer having access to the page, the 1910's. Again, if I recall correctly, it indicated that as well as the current owner of the Old Dutch mark. Obviously, the author of an Old Dutch advertisement would be the company itself.... I'd just re-upload this and fix it, rather than asking you to undelete so I can fix it, but I no longer have the image or the time and inclination to hunt down another. Thanks. -Crypticfirefly (talk) 06:17, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

 Done by Wehwalt (talk · contribs). Cheers, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 18:08, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Rupert Raj

• Rupert Raj · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

reasoning -173.206.201.31 (talk) 20:02, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 21:35, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

 Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. The article is now being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rupert Raj. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 02:59, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

File:KFWD T52.png

• File:KFWD T52.png · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This logo is ineligible for copyrights. I wonder if you have archived deleted files. -George Ho (talk) 05:41, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

The previous version can now be seen at File:KFWD T52.png. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 16:23, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

NonFreeImageRemoved.svg

• NonFreeImageRemoved.svg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Can you please undelete File:Supermushroom.png? It was removed without consideration of a deletion discussion here that has not been closed and that doesn't have consensus. The image is in active use at Power-up. -Diego (talk) 07:03, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

You may want to drop a note at User talk:Fastily, he is normally very diligent about closing discussions and may have overlooked closing that one Skier Dude (talk) 07:54, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Now at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2012 February 7. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 16:16, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Lake amadeus.jpg

• File:Lake amadeus.jpg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

botched transfer, I will fix it and F8 file -Bulwersator (talk) 09:31, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

 Done -Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 16:15, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Diana Ong

• Diana Ong · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

We all have rights to view this page, and I will contact the state representative to pass SOPA if it is not done -4.158.198.9 (talk) 12:53, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

• Not done and will not be done Oh, please do. This kind of childish vandalism - a 4-line unsourced attack page about a living person is exactly what SOPA was all about. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 14:17, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Jungle Ultra Marathon

• Jungle Ultra Marathon · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

This page has been on Wiki and reviewed with no problem at all, we simply do not understand why the page has been deleted. We ensured we stuck by the rules of Wiki and added plenty of internal and external links, even asking for SERNANP and PROMPERU to add additional information on the tribes and areas we are helping in the Amazon. There are lots of pages on Ultra Races on Wiki with far less information or references than ours - it would seem to me that we have been sabotaged in some way by another user. Thanks for your time, I'm sure you're busy. -Worldwide Happy Media (talk) 14:55, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

 Not done - this page has been deleted via a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jungle Ultra Marathon. If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Max Semenik (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Best regards, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 16:13, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

photo of ajmal shahzad

• File:Ajmal shahzad.jpg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The photo was downloaded from a free web content site. It is therefore irrelevant and unneessary to fdelete the file. He is a sports personality and his photographs as redundantly abvailable all around the web.

I therefore request the undeletion of the file as the wiki rules.

Regards. Kazim Sabri -Mdkazimsabri (talk) 16:08, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

With what licensing did this site release the photo? Do you have the URL? Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 16:19, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

 Not done. Copyright in a photo belongs to the photographer unless he assigns it. Just being on a website does not make it free. That image comes from here and is clearly labelled © SWpix.com. If other sites have published it, maybe they paid, maybe they violated copyright, but either way they cannot make it available to us. JohnCD (talk) 16:37, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

cassidi hoag

• Cassidi hoag · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

reasoning -Rhonda28 (talk) 19:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Please check www.imdb.com and search "cassidi hoag" You will find her acting credits here. Thank you Rhonda Hoag...also if you google "Cassidi Hoag" you will also find information verified on who she is

 Not done IMDB is not a valid reliable source as it is user-editable. Please see the biography of living persons policy for the importance of having multiple third party sources as backup for bios. Please also see WP:ACTOR for the definition of "notable" when it comes to actors. It is your responsibility to ensure the article meets Wikipedia requirements before creating a live article. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 19:14, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Abdolreza Razmjoo

• Abdolreza Razmjoo · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

article re-create and add new sources -Farkoh (talk) 01:02, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 01:20, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Abbaspurnew.jpg

• Abbaspur · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

image was taken by my close friend who has given full authority to use it -riz 03:27, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Not done Image File:Abbaspurnew.jpg has not been deleted. However, since you have noted that you are not the author, follow the instructions on your talk page and have the person that took the picture confirm the release of the (c) via the WP:OTRS process. Skier Dude (talk) 04:35, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Eileen Kuttab

• Eileen Kuttab · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I believe the article was deleted because notability standards were not met. I'd like the opporunity to establish that the academic scholar is notable and worthy of a wikipedia entry -Masriyya (talk) 01:13, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: Surely you jest! No page's ever existed under that title (or any reasonable permutation of it) in any reasonable namespace! Are you sure that the page's title, capitalisation and all, is correct? —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 01:17, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

...nor Eileen kuttab. Can you give the exact title of the deleted article, or failing that the username of its first author? JohnCD (talk) 14:50, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Arab Families Working Group

• Arab Families Working Group · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

I believe the article was deleted either because it was scene as promoting an organization or it didn't meet notability requirements. I'd like the chance to improve the article because I believe the subject is important and wikipedia-worthy -Masriyya (talk) 01:16, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: Surely you jest! No page's ever existed under that title (or any reasonable permutation of it) in any reasonable namespace! Are you sure that the page's title, capitalisation and all, is correct? —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 01:18, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

 Done. I've found this one - the title had a "The" on the front - and "userfied" it for you to User:Masriyya/Arab Families Working Group where you can work on it. You need to establish notability by means of references that show significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 15:12, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heather_schmid

• Heather schmid · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

reasoning -EdwardPMAC (talk) 04:05, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

References: (1) http://www.artistdirect.com/artist/bio/heather-schmid/2599040 (2) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=42Rjx-r-r9U (3) http://top40-charts.com/news.php?nid=56813 (4) http://www.hello-china.com/heather-schmid-unveils-mo-li-hua-performs-in-china- and-travels-with-the-chi-heng-foundation-to-an-affected-aids-village-in-china.html (5) http://top40-charts.com/news.php?nid=24446 (6) http://connect.in.com/heather-schmid/photos-picture-heather-schmid-and-president-musharraf-the-family-lived-in--1598391394061.html (7) http://a1.ec-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/67/6bd64a82e6d74c43a802f5c6845cbcc5/l.jpg (8) http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,509649,00.html (9) http://cn.last.fm/music/Heather+Schmid/100%2525%2Bto%2BCharity%2BGlobal%2BVillage (9) http://www.jxcn.cn/269/2007-10-11/30012@339712.htm (10) http://ent.hunantv.com/m/20090209/193803.html

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/A7

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G11

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G12

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G4

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/U5

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G10

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G5 —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 06:36, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

 Not done. That article will not be restored because it was a copyright violation, copied from http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/heather5. You must not copy material into Wikipedia: please read Wikipedia:Copy-paste. Also, it was far too promotional in tone for an encyclopedia article - fluff like "a shift in paradigm where the feminine power is now also focused on leadership role for women... powerful, beautiful, purposeful, dignified, and meaningful" is not for Wikipedia. Write a draft article in your user space, plain facts of what she has achieved, neutrally written and backed up by reliable sources, and submit it at WP:Articles for creation. More advice on your talk page soon. JohnCD (talk) 14:40, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Cheers onefortheroad.jpg

• File:Cheers onefortheroad.jpg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

NBC.com is not a real source; I don't know why someone linked to a bare URL. Nevertheless, was deleting it unreasonable, although I tagged it for deletion? To be honest, I don't know if the source was the DVD or YouTube. -George Ho (talk) 05:30, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

•  Not done If the source is unclear, then it's difficult to claim proper fair use, or attribute ownership - deletion is the only option (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:06, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Champion City Comics

• Champion City Comics · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Champion City Comics is an active webcomic company updated daily and with two printed books. It was deleted, if I understand correctly as not being important. I work 8 hours a day on this company and have put my lifeblood into it. So has Tony and other Champion City staff. Webcomics are important as feeders to the big companies like Marvel. Champion City Comics, founded by TonyDoug Wright in October of 2009, is a webcomics community fueled by a do-it-yourself philosophy. It has been our goal to provide excellent webcomics to a worldwide community while supporting and developing up-and-coming writers and artists. Currently, we have nine titles that cover various genres from science-fiction to crime noir to teen humor. Our dedicated staff of writers and artists hail from the United States -24.10.69.55 (talk) 22:14, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

• Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.. If you had intended to contribute to it, you might also want to read WP:COI (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 23:09, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Facebook Logo.png

• File:Facebook Logo.png · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This file was not orphaned - Sabeel Hussain  ^talk 15:59, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

What article was it used in? JohnCD (talk) 16:34, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

It was on facebook.  Sabeel Hussain  ^talk 12:27, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

You only uploaded it on 29 Jan, and I don't see any mention of it in the page history of Facebook. When and where was it used? File:Facebook.svg has been there all along. JohnCD (talk) 21:41, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Prijepolje

• PageName · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

reasoning -Bx228 (talk) 12:06, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

2 mine images was deleted by User:Magog the Ogre and it was clearly prompted and it was used for 6 years on Wikipedia as mine with clear copyright holder name as me , Admir Veljovic. And what happened to be deleted now ? This is outrageous , I contribute so much energy into this article and now you delete as you want. --Bx228 (talk) 12:04, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

•  Question: Can you please be a little more clear about articles/files that have been deleted? When I look at your deleted contributions, the last deletion of a file was in 2008, and I see nothing since then (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:15, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Let me add ... at least one of your files has been moved to Commons, and it's perhaps the re-upload to Wikipedia that's causing grief (in part because it should not be in both places) ... (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:20, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Henry_Roberts.jpg

• File:Henry_Roberts.jpg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The old revision 20100309142012!Henry_Roberts.jpg was deleted in 2010. From what I can see, the painter died in 1788, so there shouldn't have been any need for deletion. -Stefan2 (talk) 20:34, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Done. January (talk) 20:59, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Martti Aljand

• Martti Aljand · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This page was deleted because he was not notable. (College team only. No awards. No Sources.) But now he has represented Estonia at Olympics, bronze medal in 2011 European Short Course Swimming Championships, holds multiple Estonian records etc. -Pelmeen10 (talk) 13:42, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Not much there, though. --Tikiwont (talk) 20:52, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Comment: I have no opinion on whether the 2011 European Short Course Swimming Championships is enough for WP:NSPORTS, but it is not the Olympics. JohnCD (talk) 21:00, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Don't think that was implied above, he is linked from the 2008 Olympics articles. Anyways, needs expansion and refs. --Tikiwont (talk) 21:05, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Apologies, I misread it. JohnCD (talk) 17:38, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Anna-Liisa Põld

• Anna-Liisa Põld · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Competed at Olympics, holds several Estonian records. -Pelmeen10 (talk) 14:11, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Not done Single sentence like the one above but speedily deleted. Would be an unreferenced bio. --Tikiwont (talk) 21:00, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

 Question: Could you userfy it then? Competing at Olympics makes it notable, but article just needs work. Thanks. Pelmeen10 (talk) 22:00, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

 Done to User:Pelmeen10/Anna-Liisa Põld. JohnCD (talk) 17:37, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

revive paper

• Revive paper · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The page was deleted through speedy deletion. But i was not quite sure why it is considered promotional. And is there a way i can re edit the content so that it is factual and non promotional? -Fdchien (talk) 08:35, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

 Not done - Since the page was written so similarly to an advertisement, I think it may be most appropriate to start a new article from scratch using secondary sources. Contact me with any questions, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 15:58, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Sanjoy Deb

• Sanjoy Deb · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Article was deleted due to "advertising". But there was no form of advertising in the article, only information on a reputable producer/dj/artist. Please see if there is a possibility to undelete this article, thanks so much! -xsnoopyx (talk) 23:03, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

• Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. This was nothing but an advert for someone who does not appear to meet notability requirements (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 16:42, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

one million moms

• One million moms · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The cached article seems fine and the group is extremely newsworthy, especially at the moment due to their campaign against Ellen Degeneres. It was speedily deleted because too many people were supposedly vandalising it, which hardly seems like a reason to speedily delete such a newsworthy group. -209.128.29.254 (talk) 15:26, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

You mean One Million Moms? That wasn't deleted because it was being vandalized, it was deleted because it was a shameless advertisement thinly disguised as an article. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:34, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

•  Not done Now a redirect (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 16:39, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

An advertisement for what? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.162.211.16 (talk) 17:04, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

... for an organization that is actually merely a branch of yet another organization with the same goals and methods, and therefore requries no separate article of its own. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 17:19, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

There is apparently a mistaken belief in some circles that an advertisement for anything other than a commercial product is not "really" an advertisement; and that spamming Wikipedia (or anybody else) is "not really spamming" because the spam isn't selling a product or service. We make no such distinction here, nor do most folks when their website is abused with promotional vandalism. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:31, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Poulton Town F.C.

• Poulton Town F.C. · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This is a major local football club which plays in the West Lancashire Football League Premier Division. It has youth teams which are very popular. Bring this page back. -veganfishcake (talk) 16:27, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

• Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barnoldswick Town F.C., it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. The notability requirements for teams is quite clear under WP:FOOTY. Local "popularity" != notability (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 16:38, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

bharti axa general insurance

• Bharti AXA General Insurance · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

It was deleted by mistake. Kindly restore -125.17.159.142 (talk) 06:02, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

No, I'm pretty certain it wasn't given that its deletions are G11 speedies. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 06:32, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

• Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:26, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Herguan University

• Herguan University · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I was attempting to fix some recent vandalism when it was deleted. -Mateinsixtynine (talk) 23:29, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

• Done by User:Fastily (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:25, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Pelican-in-her-piety.jpg

• File:Pelican-in-her-piety.jpg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I'd like to transfer the original data of the author to Wikimedia Commons. --32X (talk) 11:21, 14 February 2012 (UTC) -32X (talk) 11:21, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

 Done - please just tag again for deletion when you have finished. Cheers mate, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 16:35, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Stoq

• Stoq · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd | afd2 ) · [revisions]

adding a reliable source, a research paper published about the project via FAPESP: http://www.bv.fapesp.br/pt/projetos-pipe/221/stoq-sistema-flexivel-gestao-empresas/ -Johan Dahlin (talk) 15:15, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

 Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 16:33, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dumptruck_(band)

• Dumptruck (band) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The band is notable. It released six albums (all favorably reviewed on AllMusic), had a number of hit singles on the US College radio and Alternative charts in the 1980's and was involved in a seven-year lawsuit with its label that was profiled in (to name two outlets) The Los Angeles Times and the Chicago Tribune. There was no discussion before the deltion and the guy who deleted it never responded to my contact -Swarles Barkley (talk) 03:35, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Not done The page only read "Dumptruck, an influential indie band known for their work in the 1980s, was fronted by Seth Tiven and Kirk Swan. Often compared to The Replacements and other early indie bands who never gained a mass audience, but inspired other musicians." Stuff like that is regularily deleted without discussion (CSD#A7) and isn't restorable. The article you have in mind still needs to be written. --Tikiwont (talk) 14:30, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

The problem being, of course, that one can't write any article if the page has been deleted and the high panjandrums refuse to restore it. This topic is moot since someone more sensible than you reopened the page, so I could write a biography. But thank you for documenting a fine example of circular reasoning. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swarles Barkley (talk • contribs) 20:01, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Mawashi Protective Clothing

• Mawashi Protective Clothing · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This informative page on the company Mawashi Protective Clothing Inc. was deleted because it was too promotional. Since this article is useful for the public to understand the work of the company in the fields of personal protection to reduce blunt trauma and heat stress injuries for professionals. This article can easily be edited to make it less promotional, and that will be done upon undeletion. Thank you for your consideration. -Shareitnow (talk) 17:02, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

• Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 17:12, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Richard Denny

• Richard Denny · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I am ready to add some sourced articles to give you an idea i can source Richard Denny's books to the Kogan Page where the books are featured. -Suzannebridges (talk) 19:09, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

This article was deleted as unambiguous promotion, and so is not directly a candidate for undeletion. However, if you would like to rewrite the page, I can email you the latest revision. Let me know, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 02:53, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Disney XD (Russia)

• Disney XD (Russia) · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

I'll find more sources and will see if more sources can be gained, if you don't want it on Wikipedia, then could you save it as User:TBrandley/Disney XD (Russia), Thanks--TBrandley (talk) 00:05, 16 February 2012 (UTC) -TBrandley (talk) 00:05, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

 Done Userfied per request Skier Dude (talk) 04:02, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morgul-Bismarck

• Morgul-Bismarck · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This is not my page, but I do not understand why this page was deleted. The Morgul-Bismark (spelled wrong in the original article, as Bismarck) is a bike racing circuit in Boulder County, Colorado that has been called the Morgul-Bismark for over 30 years - and there are still organized races held on this circuit using the name Morgul-Bismark. Why was this deleted? I would be glad to update or correct any previous errors (like the spelling). -98.245.116.42 (talk) 02:56, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

It was tagged for deletion for seven days. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 04:57, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:42, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Alex cantrall

• Alex cantrall · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

so I can edit the material from where it stood and change the wording. I didn't save it on my computer -Ishein (talk) 04:56, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: Of the speedy deletions this article has, the most recent deletion is a G12. Articles meeting this criterion are generally not undeleted either because they require a complete rewrite or they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. The other one, a G3, likewise will not be restored. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 04:58, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Cut-Off-map.JPG

• File:Cut-Off-map.JPG · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This was apparently an automated deletion. I own the photo of the map (which was taken off of a computer screen in 1988) and wish to release it to the general public so that it can be used again on the Lackawanna Cut-Off page. I attempted to prevent deletion of the photo-map a few weeks ago, but I, unfortunately was unsuccessful. I don't believe that this is a controversial situation. Many thanks for your understandingWallyFromColumbia (talk) 17:01, 11 February 2012 (UTC) -WallyFromColumbia (talk) 17:01, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

What attempt did you make to prevent deletion of the photo? I am having trouble figuring out what exactly happened. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 02:46, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

The problem here was that it was a photo taken off a computer screen. Nothing was stated about the copyright of what was on the screen, so a probably infringement. Unless WallyFromColumbia can show that the computer screen content was own work. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:52, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Windfall (2010 film)

• Windfall (2010 film) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I had this article in my browser from some days ago and when I clicked refresh, it now appears to have been wiped out under G5. While I'm sure G5 has its valid uses and that particular user may have been some kind of berserker creating all sorts of havoc, must a perfectly valid topic for a documentary article be wiped out because of that? The article was a bit opinionated, but that easily could have been separated into a "reception" section giving weight to various opinions. If the article as it stood needs work, with its only sin being bad parentage, then maybe WP:ARS could help? These could be a model for the article. -4.254.87.242 (talk) 05:43, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

4.254.87.242 (talk) 05:43, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Done Nyttend (talk) 04:15, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

UBD student affairs section

• UBD student affairs section · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I would like to reedit the article and link it to my university wiki page.It was apaprently deleted as spam because of one link to a blogspot. however the blogspot is for the main university residential college page. I hope that it can be undeleted so I can reedit it.Thank you -Blueeyedshiningdragons (talk) 02:28, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

•  Not done Individual offices, such as Registrar's, Student Affairs, etc, are not inherently notable in themselves. If there is some form of notability, then that information belongs in the actual university article. Mission statements, goals, etc do not belong. Blogspot is not typically a valid resource for many reasons: primarily because it is not a third party source. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:09, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Clag (band)

• Clag (band) · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

retrospective CD just released, interest re-aroused -Neopantheist (talk) 06:38, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

• Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:06, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

The Shutter Man (please email me copy Thanks)

• The Shutter Man · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

please send me a copy of my first draft article, so i may save to sand box until i have the verification required to back my article up, it took me ageas to write ands i have no copy, many thanks -HumphreyP (talk) 22:19, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: Surely you jest! No page's ever existed under that title (or any reasonable permutation of it) in any reasonable namespace! Are you sure that the page's title, capitalisation and all, is correct? I can't find it using any immediately obvious permutation of the title. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 22:32, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Looking at the requester's talk page, it was Shutterman. Humphrey, I can email it to you, but you must enable email on your account. Click "My preferences" at the top of the screen, and under "User profile", at the bottom, fill in your email address (which won't be visible to me or anyone) and check the box marked "Enable e-mail from other users". JohnCD (talk) 22:39, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

 Done - emailed. JohnCD (talk) 08:28, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

File:KCET Logo.png

• File:KCET Logo.png · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Per WP:MCQ, this logo is ineligible for copyrights. I wonder if the previous revisions are saved. -George Ho (talk) 03:39, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

 Done prior revision has been restored. Skier Dude (talk)

matt morley

• Matt Morley · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

true article -Mighty morley (talk) 08:01, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Unbelievable deleting a factual page, I bet you do this to all newbies. Had the page deleted even though I had links to all statements and photographic evidence! WIKIPEDIA I AM DISAPPOINTED IN YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 Not done. Wikipedia is not a site like Myspace for writing about yourself - read Wikipedia:Autobiography. Also, none of the links you provided as references mentions you, and even if they did none of them suggests the notability required to have an encyclopedia article. For instance, see WP:NMOTORSPORT. JohnCD (talk) 09:56, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Kozo okamoto and fusako shigenobu.jpg

• File:Kozo okamoto and fusako shigenobu.jpg · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

not my image, needed for article, I'd like to fix the rationale if I can -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 10:20, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

 Done, please remove the deletion tag once you've added the rationale. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 10:47, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, fixed, I hope.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 13:28, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

The Flintstones (2013 TV series)

• The Flintstones (2013 TV series) · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I don't want it to go into article space, could you userfy it, and call it User:TBrandley/The Flintstones (2013 TV series), Thanks, -TBrandley (talk) 18:34, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Done DON'T MOVE IT BACK TO MAINSPACE, before checking with User talk:Seraphimblade who closed the AFD. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:06, 18 February 2012 (UTC)