Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 269

< Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
Archive 265 ← Archive 267 Archive 268 Archive 269 Archive 270 Archive 271 → Archive 275

Draft:Dan Jackson

I wish to improve on the article by adding new information — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caroline neufeld (talk • contribs) 01:26, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Juliancolton | Talk 03:15, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Boomtown Biloxi

I, 2602:302:D1A2:C740:2498:B760:3460:9336, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2602:302:D1A2:C740:2498:B760:3460:9336 (talk) 07:19, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Juliancolton | Talk 03:16, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Nowthis nerd

I haven't been able to find a way to contact either the person who flagged the page to be deleted or the admin who deleted the page. None of the information I posted on the page was incorrect, however I'd happily discuss the facts involved if given the opportunity —Andyt2k (talk) 02:01, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

  Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Acroterion (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. – Juliancolton | Talk 03:18, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Sapna Punia

Redirect contains attribution history for content merged into Sapana Sapana. A bot deleted the page when the target article was temporarily moved to draft space. —• Gene93k (talk) 10:03, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

@Gene93k:   Done, and I have provided the missing copyright attribution upon the merge here, added {{R from merge}} to the redirect, and explained the issue to the user who merged this without provided attribution here. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:53, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Philip Kapneck

I, Photoloop, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Photoloop (talk) 22:10, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

I'm having trouble getting the original documents I've been waiting for - official letters from the state of Maryland. Someone is working on it and they say I could get them this month. These letters are official appointment letters. The subject of the entry stayed away from the media throughout his 40 year tenure, so that is why there is almost nothing in the mainstream media about him, that I can find, especially online. Just because he wasn't in the media doesn't make him irrelevant or not noteworthy, IMO. He was instrumental in creating many tens of thousands of jobs in the state of Maryland. (I'm just explaining the reason I'm persisting with this). I will make an edit to the page as soon as I can, and follow up on the official documents to get a status in the coming week. Thank you for reviewing this. —Photoloop (talk) 22:17, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

@Photoloop:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:28, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
I haven't looked at the draft except in passing. Just be aware regarding the sources you're speaking of above that they must be "published" sources to be used. However, this is interpreted quite liberally—stated in the verifiability policy to mean: "made available to the public in some form" – so they must reasonably available for others to access and read themselves (so they can't be, for example, like the plans for demolishing the Earth in Hitchiker's Guide, that were posted "in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory" in the cellar of a building that had no lights and broken stairs "with a sign on the door saying 'Beware of The Leopard'"). Also, those sound like primary sources, which can be used for verification purposes, but do nothing to demonstrate notability. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:40, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Kaleina Cordova (actress)

2601:58C:C200:F4B4:198D:4C71:9A96:8E95 (talk) 16:19, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

The draft had already been re-created, but   Done, the page history is restored. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:08, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Magnolia Summer

I, Coalminecanary, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Coalminecanary (talk) 17:21, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

I had a few edits left before submitting it; however, time slipped away from me. I would like to save the page and resubmit for consideration. —Coalminecanary (talk) 17:24, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

@Coalminecanary:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:10, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Tom Gildred

Page went through speedy deletion because it was created by a banned user. I John Ryan, am not banned, and I would like to restore/revise the article. —JohnPRyan (talk) 17:31, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

@JohnPRyan:   Done, the article has been restored to draft space at Draft:Tom Gildred. Please work on it there and submit for review. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:13, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

DaCast

Page was deleted with very little discussion. Though the page in its final state was promotional, I hardly think it is a G11 candidate and seems a good base to work forward from. —Owen (talk) 19:37, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

  Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DaCast, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Kurykh (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:16, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
And I agree it would have been a G11 candidate. The way it's written, as if it came straight from the company's "about us" page on their web site, makes it seem like the article existed solely for publicity purposes. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:18, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Tony Lakatos

Requesting Userfication of A7'ed article. Lakatos is in standard jazz encyclopedias. Deleting admin no longer active. —Chubbles (talk) 08:54, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

@Chubbles:   Done See User:Chubbles/Tony Lakatos.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:57, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Jack Picone self-portrait in Sydney, Australia.jpg

We obtained the author's permission via OTRS ticket:2017031310009215. Thanks —Ruthven (talk) 13:22, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

@Ruthven: Done, I've reset the deletion mark, remember to add the permission template. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:53, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
  Done Thanks --Ruthven (msg) 15:01, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Eúgèñė

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Eu'gêñė 01:26, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

  1. What im saying is my templetes set to progress for reference concerns
  2. Why speedy delete
  3. An im having reuest to use material issues

— Preceding unsigned comment added by IVFiPodTouch (talk • contribs) 01:26, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

  Not done. It was speedily deleted because it was a test page posted in main article space. There is no value to Wikipedia in restoring test pages (this one was 3 or 4 words with many underscore characters). Please use your own sandbox. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:02, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Johnston diagram

Currently researching the various/many kinds of Venn diagram derivatives, I found occasional (secondary) references to a "Johnston" or "exclusion diagram" type, however, so far I could not clearly identify the original primary work(s) introducing this diagram (apparently several decades ago). Before overwriting our PRODed article on Johnston diagrams by a redirect to "Venn diagram", I'd like to have a look at the previous contents in order to see if it contains useful info which could help to either establish a better stand-alone article or could be incorporated into the Venn diagram article. Therefore, please undelete the previous article. Thanks. —Matthiaspaul (talk) 22:07, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

@Matthiaspaul:   Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:04, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Aleta Ogord.jpg

The current version of this file should be used at Aleta Ogord, not the March 2008 version at File:A.O..jpg. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 15:25, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

@GeoffreyT2000: It isn't clear what you want done. File:Aleta Ogord.jpg has two versions, a larger one and a smaller one. The larger one is the current version at the moment. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:08, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Edgard Cirlin

I would like to try editing it to see if I can get it to meet criteria to make it acceptable —Cjm900 (talk) 15:47, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

@Cjm900:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:30, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
@Cjm900: I suggest starting with reading and then citing sources like those found through this Google Books search. You might try using the Wikipedia citation tool for Google Books to make the citation process easier.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:35, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
@Cjm900: By the way, the article is now at Draft:Edgard Cirlin, not the original place you requested undeletion. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:09, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

User:ㅂㄱㅇ

Please undelete my user page and move it to User:ㅂㄱㅇ/up without redirect. I proposed to delete this page, but I want it now. —ㅂㄱㅇ (talk) (Bieup Giyeok Ieung) 09:04, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

  Done. ℯxplicit 11:43, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

S.M.A.R.T. Chase

It appears administrator User:Yamla deleted the page because he thought it had been written by a marketing company named Bliss Media, potentially violating WP:Paid. As a fan interested in Orlando Bloom's latest filmography and unaffiliated to Bliss Media, I stumbled upon new evidence from Elle (magazine) UK that this particular "controversial" movie will be shown after all. Therefore, I reached out to User:Yamla, trying to understand exactly what had been written to see if any of the marketing content could be removed and the article be edited to exclude any unattributed writing, but s/he insisted on WP:RFU. I think this is now the proper step to solve this. My intent is to recover the deleted page and improve the writing to include only attributable content. Thanks. —Supermansaga (talk) 12:39, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

I'm certainly not opposed to this undeletion. My concern is that the page as it existed prior to deletion was entirely a violation of WP:PAID and WP:COI and somewhat, WP:PROMO. I therefore am not sure whether or not the page should be undeleted or whether an entirely new, uncontaminated, article should be created. I say this without prejudice. Whoever reviews this request is entirely free to act as they see fit. --Yamla (talk) 14:15, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
Thanks Yamla. @Supermansaga:   Done, I have restored the article and removed a bit of puffery from it. As it stands now, it doesn't seem unambiguously promotional, regardless of the pedigree of its past contributors. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:11, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
Thanks! Anachronist I highly appreciate it. Is it possible to also restore the movie poster in the article at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Upload?wpDestFile=S.M.A.R.T._Chase_3-6-2017.jpg? I'm a bit confused by the upload process and want to leave it at the hands of the capable. The picture is publicly available at http://weibo.com/5866419168/Eyxcm5nUI. Thanks. In the meantime, I am curious if I could have access to any other relevant pages deleted by Yamla and Ad Orientem, such as Bliss Media and/or Wei Han. I want to know if any puffery within them could be removed. Some new lawsuit info regarding them recently came to light by the way as reported by The Hollywood Reporter and what not. Thanks.Supermansaga (talk) 05:21, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
@Supermansaga: Unfortunately, the poster wasn't deleted because it was orphaned, it was deleted because it was missing required information, specifically the source of the image, so that copyright can be verified. If I restored it, it would simply be deleted again, unless you can provide me with the source of the image. The deleted image doesn't appear on the page you linked. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:47, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Scratch that, it was my web filtering software suppressing the image. I see it now. In any case, that isn't the same image. The deleted image is much larger. It cannot be restored because it is too large for a non-free fair-use image. Please re-upload a smaller one; the one on that page you linked should be about right; it's only 305px in width. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:06, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Cool. I re-uploaded the movie poster at 480x712 pixels to Wikimedia Commons, but I am still confused about the licensing condition, so I just selected the button, "I found it online and understood it could be subject to deletion." Is this the right approach? I certainly don't want to do overboard marketing for Bliss Media, despite I would like to see its own page restored and free from puffery. Thanks.Supermansaga (talk) 07:04, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
@Supermansaga: No, that's a non-free fair-use image. Commons is for public-domain or other images released under an acceptable free license like Creative Commons or GFDL. Unless there is a clear statement on that web site that the image is public domain or freely re-usable, it absolutely cannot be kept on Commons. You must upload it to the English Wikipedia only. And as a non-free image, it must be low-resolution; please use the small 305px-wide image located here: https://wx2.sinaimg.cn/orj360/006p0TC0gy1fdd3mooxy3j30qo13jwx7.jpg ~Anachronist (talk) 07:59, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
@Anachronist: Your wish is my command. I have fixed the resolution. It appears it's 360 in width not 306 by default?
The file at https://wx2.sinaimg.cn/orj360/006p0TC0gy1fdd3mooxy3j30qo13jwx7.jpg appears smaller to me, but what you did is OK. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:48, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
@Anachronist: Great! Just saw your reply. Once I saved the pix from your url and right-click on its property, it shows the width is 360, not 306. So I assume it's the same without the need for my further tinkering. Now is it safe to ask for RFU on Bliss Media and Wei Han? I believe you could help clean up any puffery. In the meantime, I want to write about the lawsuits they face. Interesting times. Without the original text, it's hard for me to begin. thanks.Supermansaga (talk) 09:16, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

FTR: SPI opened. --bonadea contributions talk 09:50, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

...and Supermansaga has been blocked for sockpuppetry. :-( Perhaps S.M.A.R.T. Chase should be deleted as created by a sock of a blocked user; looking at it, it's mostly about Bliss Media and their lawsuits. Very little actual sourced content about the film itself. --bonadea contributions talk 15:15, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
@Bonadea: It wasn't created by a sock; Supermansaga started editing it a while after it was created by someone else. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:09, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:EnviroVent

I, Adamslinger, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Adam Slinger (talk) 09:07, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

@Adamslinger: First would you please publicly identify your association with EnviroVent on your user page? See WP:PAID for information on this. When you created an account here, you entered into a legal agreement to abide by Wikimedia:Terms of Use, which requires you to disclose any paid editing. At the moment, it seems you aren't in compliance with that agreement. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:14, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Judith Love Cohen

Would like to pass along the draft to the individual's family as she is now deceased and then click the "Save page" button below —Krsanders25 (talk) 16:39, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

@Krsanders25:   Done, I just restored it. The draft will exist for another six months and then be deleted again if no one comes along and tries to get it into shape for publication in main article space. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:21, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Hampstead Anti-Alien Petition

DanInMiami (talk) 10:07, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

@DanInMiami:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:22, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Qmarkets

I, Bigross86, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bigross86 (talk) 11:43, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

@Bigross86:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
There is also some additional contribution history from before you created that draft. That is also restored. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:26, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:360nobs

I, 154.66.63.74, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 154.66.63.74 (talk) 10:03, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:28, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Oye_Akideinde

I, 169.159.95.114, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 169.159.95.114 (talk) 09:18, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:29, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Harrison Myers

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —WilliamJCartrightIII (talk) 22:57, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

13:41, 15 July 2016 Iridescent (talk | contribs) deleted page Harrison Myers (Expired PROD, concern was: IMDB and a non-independent source only; no evidence of notability)

This is the information stating why my page was deleted in 2016. It's continually argued that I have no notability of the films, and I should have listed enough reputable links in my "External Links" section. I am baffled as to what was considered inadequate.

That's because we require inline citations for biographies. As noted, wikis (such as IMDB) and sources connected to the subject are not appropriate sources. What film news articles have discussed you in depth? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 04:07, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Other than IMBD, what else comes to mind, or doesn't — Preceding unsigned comment added by WilliamJCartrightIII (talk • contribs) 04:15, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/DN Capital

I, Bradraener, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bradraener (talk) 15:10, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

@Bradraener: First, see WP:PAID and comply with it if it applies to you.
Unfortunately:
  Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Jimfbleak (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:18, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
@Bradraener: You could go to deletion review as Anachronist suggests, but since the article is locked because it was speedy deleted as spam three times, you are unlikely to get much joy there. Better to write as a draft in a sandbox and then request unlocking if it's acceptable. You must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines, write in a non-promotional tone and declare any conflict of interest especially under WP:PAID Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:05, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Senandung Nacita

Please let me retrieve my writing about Senandung Nacita. This article was different to the previous one. I have not been given a chance to dispute the deletion request. —180.254.179.185 (talk) 23:58, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Was that your writing? The article was created by User:Terry Shelton. Is that you? There are no contributions from your IP address. In fact, the contributions from the IP address in that article are small edits, not content edits. Therefore, I have to assume that you are Terry Sheldon, if the article was your writing. Sorry, we cannot consider undeleting it until you get your account unblocked. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:46, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Holoverse

I did request on the thread with those monitoring it that it be left up for a couple of weeks so I can further work on it to get it up to scratch. I had already been told that the second review I had done of it had fixed a lot of the original things. I just need a little bit more time to get the referencing done in correct formatting. I am a donor, love Wikipedia, and have just started working for this company who have asked me to do their Wiki page for them. I was most of the way there when it was taken down. So I would appreciate a couple of weeks more to work on the content so it can be to your liking and added to the encyclopedia. Please allow it back up for that time. Many thanks. Simon —SBanks82 (talk) 06:26, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

@SBanks82:   Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request.
@SwisterTwister: Since you prodded it originally, if you still feel it should be deleted, it needs to go to AFD. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:50, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
@SwisterTwister: Thanks for the feedback guys. I have gone and made a few more edits, like:

improving the reference list as you requested, linked the page to eight other Wikipedia pages, further edited layout to match the common Wiki format, ensured anything even remotely sounding advertisement like was not present, and ensured all detail is not only extremely relevant but not in any way intricate. Any feedback is welcome but I believe it contains information that upholds integrity, being both relevant and accurate for your readers. Thank you for your patience.

Sumi Tonooka

Contest PROD. Tonooka appears in standard jazz encyclopedias and released two albums on Candid Records; see also de:Sumi Tonooka. I have her Grove Dictionary of Jazz entry open in front of me right now. —Chubbles (talk) 06:33, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Lectonar (talk) 06:52, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Painted Woman

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Jamescotten (talk) 07:34, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

  Not done. @Jamescotten: I assume you created the page using another account and thus know the page contained no information other than that it's a film written and directed by yourself. As such, any such article will immediately be sent to Articles for deletion upon restoration unless you can prove that this is a notable film. For this reason, and because of your conflict of interest, you are invited to create a draft version of the article, for example at Draft:Painted Woman or User:Jamescotten/Painted Woman where you can work on the article before moving it to the main space, thus saving us all a lot of time. Regards SoWhy 07:48, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

John Layfield bullying and harassment allegations

Please userfy this article to my user space. I'd like to clean it up and make it more general about other hazing, not just his. —Pinguinn 🐧 16:09, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Daniel Janies

Created page yesterday, mainly violation on copyrights were on bio of scholar, no other violations were performed on "select publications" nor "references" on page, would like to address copyrights issues rewriting short timeline of events from when he graduated, etc, having page undeleted and sent to draft so I can better work and ask for advice before publishing next —Darrieux (talk) 02:20, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

  • Copyvio is absolutely never restored given it's our legal policy so anything now will be started anew. SwisterTwister talk 06:29, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:WestRock Company

Please restore so that I can then redirect to WestRock and the page history of the work that was done on the Draft version will be maintained. UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:16, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

ngong forest

ngong forest is a broad topic and could be constructive in the encyclopedia, i believe it was nominated for deleting may be because of less content or explanation but i just introduce the article so i can add valuable content later. moving the page title from ngong forest to ngong road forest will be referring to a completely different topic. Thagana peters (talk) 13:36, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

  Not done I'm not sure what prompted your request, Thagana peters, since this article was created by you and has never been deleted. It was, however, moved to its proper noun current title, but the lower case still exists as a redirect.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk)

Birmingham Festival Choral Society

Birmingham Festival Choral Society (BFCS) is Birmingham’s longest established SATB chorus; it was formed in 1843, and is still going strong.

The first BFCS concert was in Town Hall, Birmingham in 1845; in the 1846 Triennial Musical Festival Felix Mendelssohn himself conducted the première of Elijah, with BFCS supplying the major portion of the Festival Chorus, as it did until the last Triennial Musical Festival in 1912. Mendelssohn also conducted BFCS in a revised version of Elijah in Birmingham Town Hall on 27th April 1847, just six months before his death.

Since Elijah (1846) BFCS has regularly been involved in the premières of "modern" music ranging from Dvorak's Requiem (1891), Elgar's The Dream of Gerontius (1900) and The Music Makers (1912), through to Patrick Larley's The Birmingham Spirituals (2014). Since 1975 the choir has premièred seventeen new choral works (eleven commissioned by BFCS).

Notable BFCS conductors have included Sir Thomas Beecham, Sir Henry Wood, and Sir Adrian Boult (who became the choir's president until his death in 1983). The longest-serving ones have been William C Stockley (1855 - 1895) and Jeremy Patterson (1969 - 2004). David Wynne was appointed as the seventeenth BFCS Music Director in November 2016.

BFCS has always helped to raise funds for charitable purposes. Proceeds from Birmingham's Triennial Musical Festivals helped to build and maintain Birmingham's General Hospital, and this policy has been continued with the choir’s annual Christmas concert, which raises funds for a local charity chosen by chorus members.

The choir regularly tours abroad. Since 1992 it has performed in Bulgaria, Poland, the Czech Republic, Germany, Belgium, Holland, Slovenia, Estonia, Slovakia, Eire, and France. On tours to Eastern Europe, BFCS has taken gifts and money to aid local charities.

The choir rehearses every Wednesday night (at 7.15 pm) at Lordswood Girls' School, and is always pleased to welcome prospective new members.

References 1. Jack Yardley, BFCS: The First One Hundred and Fifty Years. 2. Anne Elliott, The Music Makers - A History of the Birmingham Triennial Musical Festivals. 3. www.bfcs.org.uk Bfcsfletch (talk) 09:26, 11 May 2017 (UTC) Bfcsfletch/sandbox

Lorenzo Iorio

He is an expert in the field of general relativity and astrophysics. Freely available sources like the database NASA/ADS certifies that. He is the EiC of a journal listing a Nobel Prize in its Editorial Board, who cited Iorio several times in a paper of him. There are several scientists in Wikipedia with a similar or lower standing. No reasons for not having him as well. —Redwheel (talk) 21:20, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

  Not done. Hi Redwheel. None of what you said has relevancy here. This page is very specifically for uncontroversial undeletion of pages that were deleted on uncontroversial bases, and so, as instructed at the top, it is not for undeletion of pages deleted after discussion, or on certain other bases that would overturn a considered exercise of judgment. The inclusion of an article about this subject has been considered by the community at two separate articles for deletion debates (1, 2), and so is not within the ambit of this page.

The place, if at all, to properly request undeletion is at Wikipedia:Deletion review, under the idea that "significant new information has come to light since a deletion that would justify recreating the deleted page"—which would need to be supported by disclosing formerly unfound or new reliable, secondary, independent, published sources that treat him in substantive detail (not just mere mentions). In the absence oh bringing those to light, it is doubtful any such request would be successful. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:35, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

French Books on India

I, 164.39.39.20, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 164.39.39.20 (talk) 17:28, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

  Not done This page was deleted as a blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion; and Wikipedia is not to be used as a vehicle for promotion. As disclosed at the top of this page: "Please do not request that articles deleted under speedy deletion criteria ... G11 ... be undeleted here." Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:49, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Koushani Mukherjee

I want to give real citation link. This article for a person who is a bengali film actress —T. Singha 16:54, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi Tushar Singha.   Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koushani Mukherjee, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:54, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
P.S. Please fix your signature. See WP:SIGLINK.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:54, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Delilah W. Pierce

Article was merged[1] into Delilah Pierce and deleted. The admin added "R from merge" and says on their talk page: "any relevant information has been merged - a simple and copy and paste"[2] —Christian75 (talk) 09:42, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

@Christian75:   Done. The edits were a further copyright problem in that there was no explanation and hyperlink in the edit summary. I have repaired the copyright attribution, and will leave a note at the user's talk page explaining the issue, since the reply to you there indicates the issue is not understood.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:10, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

restoration

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —188.152.3.57 (talk) 18:32, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

  Not done. This request does not contain enough information to glean what it is about, and the history of the IP address you are editing from provides no leads.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:00, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Elenasmodels

Dear Kurykh,


I had write on Elenasmodels in 2016 and today I noticed that my page has been deleted. Can I have proper cause why my page has considered for deletion after 1 year? Can I re-write on the same? Please advice me.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.243.75.226 (talk • contribs)

  Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elenasmodels, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:10, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Frank Rosenwein

Rosenwein (talk) 23:34, 11 May 2017 (UTC) https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Frank_Rosenwein&action=edit&redlink=1

Northern Ford Premiership

Contest PROD. Article has significant notability as a historical professional rugby league competition. —86.3.174.49 (talk) 03:48, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Gina Genovese

Gina Genovese is a politician in New Jersey, United States and is running for governor as an independent in 2017. —50.243.81.249 (talk) 20:19, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

  •   Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gina Genovese (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Northamerica1000 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. SoWhy 13:43, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Shri Bhagavatananda Guru

If Shri Bhagavatananda Guru article contents some lines violating Wikipedia, remove those selected lines instead of whole article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by S.B.N. Guru (talk • contribs) 08:46, 13 May 2017 (UTC) Such a amazing and prodigy talent should be described at Wikipedia. His biography is not present is a matter of sad surprise. Kindly make the changes if you think that it violates the terms. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:205:A083:9B89:59B3:F6A9:C4EB:ABEA (talk) 08:50, 13 May 2017 (UTC) Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Freyja10 (talk • contribs) 21:10, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Union Pacific 4006

There were originally no sources that supported the article (which is why it was deleted). However, I have recently discovered sources that may help the page a bit. I would like this page undeleted so I can add the sources in. —Davidng913 (talk) 20:54, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

  Done. Since this was deleted through a PROD, which we usually restore uncontroversially anyway, as this was your prod ... 'but of course', undeleted.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 15:33, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jerimic Clayborn III

I, Jclayborn21, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jclayborn21 (talk) 15:22, 12 May 2017 (UTC)==

@Jclayborn21:   Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 15:49, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
I have moved the draft to the draft namespace: Draft:Jerimic Clayborn III.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 15:49, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Viaden Media

The article was deleted in 2007, as there was no significance (true). And removed again in 2011 as a repost (someone tried to bypass the procedure for restoring the article). Now I translated a Russian-language article (look at this draft) about the company (article in ru-wiki exists since 2011). I believe that it is obvious from the text that the company was one of the largest developers in Eastern Europe. —ELindas (talk) 14:12, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

  Hi ELindas. Please understand for future reference that under our copyright licenses, when you translate a foreign language Wikipedia article, or copy any content across from another page by any means, you must provide copyright attribution in the edit summary, stating what you've done, and provide a hyperlink to the source of your copying/translation. Please see generally Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and specifically here, Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. I have repaired the attribution in your draft using a dummy edit in this diff.

Since the previous article's content was promotional, and deleted after this discussion, and since your translation draft does not use the content from there, a history merge would graft onto its history content with a different origin, which is not usually done. But just undeleting it (without performing a history merge) would leave this separate page, deleted after discussion, just sitting out there. So I'm not sure what the need is here for undeletion. Is your purpose to see whether it has any usable content? Meanwhile, since it was deleted after two AfD's, I am pinging the deleting admin, Courcelles,‎ who salted the title. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 16:35, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

ablrate

Ablrate is a peer to peer lending platform. It is notable as it was the first to finance aircraft (Reuters: http://uk.reuters.com/article/airplane-crowdfunding-idUKL5N0QS1NU20140825 ), the company has received full authorsiation ( fully regulated http://www.p2pfinancenews.co.uk/2017/03/31/ablrate-fca-approval/ IFISA approved http://www.p2pfinancenews.co.uk/2017/04/28/ablrate-hmrc-approval/, and we been the first to have innovations in the industry such as the secondary market http://www.altfi.com/article/1186_ablrate_launches_secondary_market. I cannot image why the page has been deleted, unless there is a bit of competitor skullduggery going on. —86.128.169.73 (talk) 09:07, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

  • Why you are actually offering here is not compliant with WP:What Wikipedia is not and is certainly not what establishes notability; the sources are clear business announcements and notices, not genuine independent coverage. Note that this policy is non-negotiable. SwisterTwister talk 23:09, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

OZAYBABY

"OZAYBABY" is a Musician that is on the rise with success,has been on tv,radio,and several interviews. I did nothing wrong in his article and so many people are trying to make him/editing his articles they keep getting deleted. I with his article getting speedy deleted. He is Notable —ArianCruise (talk) 07:54, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia articles are about subjects that are already notable, not for those that are "on the rise". If and when he becomes notable, then there can be an article. So many people have been trying to make him famous by writing about him here (which is backwards from the way it works) that this page title has been protected so only administrators can create it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Orangemike (talk • contribs)

Draft:MotoPress

(no text provided) John mp Smith (talk) 08:04, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wild Food

(no text provided) LastAnon (talk) 13:47, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Jenavieve Varga

I, Danielblee, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. DBL 19:45, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Privacy in Social Information Access

I request this page because it is a part of course project that I worked on. I need it back to get grade and then I will edit it, so please help me out in this situation —Azizsalim (talk) 09:47, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

  Not done Wikipedia is not a venue for original research. Your course paper does not constitute an encyclopedia article; sorry. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:13, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Diamond Foundry

Company is America's largest diamond producer, is in the news all the time. Funded by Leonardo DiCaprio and $100m others. Fighting the diamond cartel. There must be serious foul play at work why this company's article was deleted. —70.36.137.144 (talk) 00:34, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

On the contrary; assume some good faith here, for crying out loud. The only article about this company was created in violation of our rules by a banned or blocked user. If what you say is true, there is nothing to prevent the creation of a sound article (which means non-promotional, and without any content like "Fighting the diamond cartel", which would be a shameless violation of our non-negotiable neutral point-of-view policy). --Orange Mike | Talk 21:19, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

The Warehouse (2008)

I gave up trying to write the article because I couldn't find any sources, but then I realized that I had been using the wrong title when searching. I don't want to have to write the whole page again so please restore it, thanks. —BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 03:20, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

  • BottleOfChocolateMilk I'd restored this, but I couldn't find a single source to show that this movie exists. Not all films pass WP:NFILM, so I need some sort of assurance that the movie exists and has received coverage in independent and reliable sources before I restore it again. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 21:23, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
    When I wrote the article for "The Warehouse" (actually titled "The Torturing"), I was under the impression that it had been released in 2008. However, after emailing the director, I have ascertained that the film actually hasn't been released yet. I was wondering if I could just get it restored for a little while or moved to a user draft or something? That way, I could save it somewhere and add {{db-author}} when I'm done so it can be deleted again. Once the movie's released, I can re-create the page and add reviews and other sources, and I won't have to rewrite the whole article. —BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 00:07, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
If the film hasn't even been released yet, the odds that it is notable enough to justify an article are darned low. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:21, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Que Tienes Tu

Hi, i'm NigtwingGuy and i request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it through Sandbox, it took me time to do and I needed to add my sources from the information to make the page more reasonable, please is their anyway to just to see my work and go through it again. —NightwingGuy (talk) 21:04, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

  Done Restored for the moment, as it no longer qualifies for speedy deletion under CSD A9 (there is now the article Dvicio). --Orange Mike | Talk 21:30, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

David Marco

I, EWSolutions DM, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. EWSolutions DM (talk) 01:38, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

That was an advertisement for you and your company. We will not restore your self-aggrandizement. --Orange Mike | Talk 03:11, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Web-Translations

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Algo 932 (talk) 12:59, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Robert Sonneman

I, Sonneman, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sonneman (talk) 16:59, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Looks like they are talking about Draft:Robert Sonneman. ~ GB fan 17:27, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Charlene "Yedveta" Robinson

please undelete so I can correct any errors and complete the submission —Yedveta7 (talk) 19:19, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Anthony Morgan (comedian)

I, Duffbeerforme, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. duffbeerforme (talk) 04:07, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Bonin Bough

Please undelete and return to draft space so I may work on it and resubmit to AfC. — —አቤል ዳዊት?(Janweh64) (talk) 06:42, 18 May 2017 (UTC)


  Done SmartSE (talk) 09:32, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Live Exploit Immunisation

Please restore this page as a draft as it might be relevant to an "Immunisation" section (or alike) of the Zero-day (computing) page. No need to restore if its content only consisted of this: this. —Fixuture (talk) 10:10, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_269&oldid=1142568538"