Wikipedia:Peer review/Skene (theatre)/archive1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because…I am in the process of significantly improving the quality of the article

Thanks, Stories Alive (talk) 01:40, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Much of the article is uncited. The content appears to be good quality, but all Wikipedia articles should be cited to reliable sources, so please add footnotes to everything in the body.
The format of the footnotes, is pretty much up to you, but you should make sure page numbers are cited where possible. Take a look at some articles listed at WP:FA or WP:GA and see how they do it, and pick a style you like.
The last sentence in the "Classical Greece" section is just a quote; it should be integrated into the text narrative.
Can we get a diagram showing a typical stage layout, with the skene, proscaenium, logeion, and so on identified? I can see this won't be easy because a plan view wouldn't let you separately label things like the theologian or thyromata, but it would be handy if possible.
Do the sources discuss evolution after the Roman period? If the skene disappears after that point, I think the article should say so.

-- Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 15:06, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]