Wikipedia:Peer review/Russia/archive2

Russia edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because…

Hello, pls review this article for peer review. The text is well written, contains much informations about culture, economy, histoy and other issues. The article is very informative and written in a good english language. It also contains huge amount of picture, which are all copyrighted, and I realy liked the government and politics part, especially the subdivisions and demography. This article includes everything about a country what constitutes to call a country! its already a good article, and so it should be a featured article imho. thank you. ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 18:29, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See the talk page regarding a GA review; this article should not be listed at PR when a GA review is pending. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:53, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sandy, I could not find which talk page you mentioned. I have never known of any restriction on an article being at both PR and GAN at the same time, and I just looked at WP:GAN and the linked pages there and found no such restrictions. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 01:12, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I put a {{GA request}} at Talk:Russia after it was nommed at FAC, and Geometry guy has responded there. Work is underway to reduce the size of the article, and (hopefully) address the lack of citations. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:18, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ruhrfisch, I agree with SandyGeorgia that this peer review should not have started (I agree that simultaneous GAN and PR is no issue, but Sandy is talking about a request to GAR and PR). There is considerable discussion over the article on its talk page (that is still ongoing) before this peer review request was even raised. I do not think peer review should be used to distract their train of thought or as a side way introduction of third-party opinions. We have RFCs and 3Os for that. Jappalang (talk) 00:53, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have closed (archived) the PR per the above discussion. If GreatOrangePumpkin or anyone else wants a new PR after the GAR concludes, please feel free to open one. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 17:40, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

sry sandy, didnt knew that it need a GAR nomination.-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 17:51, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]