Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Demon Murder Trial/1

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: delist Having examined the article closely I find that it is not in fact well written, there is some close paraphrasing of source material and events which are in reality allegations are presented as fact. I agree that it reads more like a story than an encyclopaedia article. Jezhotwells (talk) 08:03, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seeking community reassessment for the Demon Murder Trial article on the grounds that it does not meet the first criterion for GA status, in that it is not well-written.

The article requires work to improve grammar and style, and currently reads as if it were a story rather than an encyclopaedic article, containing phrases such as 'It was then they decided not to take the rental property because it was evil.' Helenabella (talk) 12:56, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be taking the lead on the corrections to the article, so we can get it back to sparkly GA shape. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 14:04, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Could you list some of the specific issues you see with examples? I'd like to get started with the articles repair. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 16:31, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.