Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Skeletal muscle3

Skeletal muscle edit

Two previously failed noms - 1 and 2 - both times the major objection was the bodybuilder in the upper-right corner. That has now been replaced, and I think it's FP material now.

Nominate and support →Raul654 02:38, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Not to dredge up old ghosts, but the photo of the man is still distracting, mostly because it is a square photo with defined edges while the other important parts of the image are dynamically arranged sketches/diagrams. Would it be possible to use a sketch of an bicep, so as to blend that level with the rest of the image? CapeCodEph 06:12, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. That man... argh! Enochlau 10:03, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Um, could you be a little less vague please? →Raul654 20:19, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  - I still think the man is distracting, because it is in such stark contrast with the rest of the image - it feels out of place. I think Capecodeph's idea of using a sketch is a good idea. Enochlau 06:38, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -I agree - lose the photo. I also find the way you follow the increasing magnifications around in an arc a bit off-putting. I think I'd prefer it as a long strip. --bodnotbod 19:37, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. See my comment above for Airport_traffic_pattern.jpg. --ScottyBoy900Q∞ 02:47, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - for one, the drawings would be much more revealing if they were coloured, as you might see in an anatomy textbook. — ceejayoz ^★ 12:25, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Either a diagram or a photograph, but never both. –Uris 02:00, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted Raven4x4x 02:09, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]