Support as nominator --Cat-five - talk 03:05, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Is this WP:POINT? I don't know. But regardless, it fails to meet FP criteria 3: " Is among Wikipedia's best work." This took almost zero effort to make - it is therefore not among the best work which does take effort to produce. deBivort 06:00, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A green rectangle. Yes, it's a national flag but no, it's not outstanding or unique. Capital photographer (talk) 06:32, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sure smells like WP:POINT to me. See talk page... --Janke | Talk 06:51, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Read into it what you want I won't confirm nor will I deny that it is trying to prove a point, incidentally the nominator's percieved motives while an interesting side note is not even broadly a valid reasons by the furthest stretches of the featured picture guidelines, including the parts that are broad enough where anyone can oppose for any reason based on a "judgement call", to oppose an image. Only Debivort and Capital actually have given valid criticisms of the nominated image which is what we're here to do. Cat-five - talk 09:45, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Close and ban Cat-five for a blatant violation of WP:POINTClegs (talk) 16:02, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
