Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Congress of Vienna
1. Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington (UK)
2. Joaquim Lobo da Silveira (Portugal)
3. António Saldanha da Gama (Portugal)
4. Count Carl Löwenhielm (Sweden)
5. Jean-Louis-Paul-François, 5th Duke of Noailles (France)
6. Prince Klemens Wenzel von Metternich (Austria)
7. André Marie Jean Jacques Dupin (France)
8. Count Karl Robert Nesselrode (Russia)
9. Pedro de Sousa Holstein, 1st Count, 1st Marquess and 1st Duke de Palmela (Portugal)
10. Robert Stewart, Viscount Castlereagh (UK)
11. Emmerich Joseph, Duke of Dalberg (France)
12. Ignaz Heinrich von Wessenberg (Confederation of the Rhine)
13. Prince Andrey Kirillovich Razumovsky (Russia)
14. Charles Stewart, 3rd Marquess of Londonderry (UK)
15. Pedro Gómez Labrador, Marquis of Labrador (Spain)
16. Richard Trench, 2nd Earl of Clancarty (UK)
17. Wacken (Recorder)
18. Friedrich von Gentz (Congress Secretary)
19. Baron Friedrich Wilhelm Christian Karl Ferdinand von Humboldt (Prussia)
20. William Schaw Cathcart, 1st Earl Cathcart (UK)
21. Prince Karl August von Hardenberg
22. Charles Maurice de Talleyrand-Périgord, 1st Sovereign Prince de Bénévent (France)
23. Count Gustav Ernst von Stackelberg (Russia)
24. probably Francis II, Holy Roman Emperor
25. Count Wenzel Anton Kaunitz
- Reason
- highly informative value with listed caption, adding value to articles about the Congress
- Articles this image appears in
- Congress of Vienna, its participants articles will be added
- Creator
- Isabey´s original drawing 1819 modified by Aloysius
- Support as nominator --Aloysius (talk) 05:08, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose The image isn't brilliant quality and putting the numbers so prominently in the image is a mistake. Capital photographer (talk) 08:30, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Low quality scan. Suggestion: Put numbers only in a second, "descriptive version" of the image on the image page. --Janke | Talk 09:00, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose - as per Janke, horrible unsightly numbers edited onto the pic make it a definite no-no. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 19:38, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Comment I agree with you, I just did not want the picture to substitute the original picture, that is why I chose worse quality and black and white version - it is a descriptive picture for the original (which it should link) - I stand down. --Aloysius (talk) 09:40, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose per Janke.Greener Cactus (talk) 20:17, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Not promoted . --John254 04:14, 10 July 2008 (UTC)