Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Chicago Board of Trade Building at night

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2010 at 02:59:31 (UTC)

 
Original - Chicago Board of Trade Building is a National Historic Landmark
Reason
This is a high EV image.
Articles in which this image appears
List of Chicago Landmarks
Chicago Board of Trade Building
Chicago Board of Trade
Chicago
CME Group
National Register of Historic Places listings in Chicago
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator
Daniel Schwen (User:Dschwen)
  • Support as nominator --TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:59, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks a bunch for the nomination, but This is actually a small crop from a three segment exposure-blended panorama of the entire building. I uploaded it because I was not quite happy yet with the full image, and wanted to provide a replacement for the super tiny gif that was used in its place. I'll upload the full image soon, but I fear it won't be quite up to the FPC bar either (and this crop does not have a snowball's chance in my opinion). --Dschwen 03:18, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Nice picture, Dschwen. Fine work. And I think you are correct; a crop of the top of the building has less EV. Personally, I’m tending lately to place increasing emphasis on whether a picture is “eye-catching to the point where users will want to read its accompanying article.” Our FP criteria isn’t *and* EV; it can be one or the other. Even with that in mind, this picture might be a little weak on the “eye-catching” bit because it lacks color and is a fragment of a building. Clearly good work though. Greg L (talk) 04:28, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reluctant Oppose per Dschwen - I will look forward to the full version though as it has potential in my eyes, just not when it's just part of the building... Gazhiley (talk) 10:20, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Noise around the top of the pictire is overwhelming. The fact that it's a crop of a building where a full shot/panoramic is easily possible is another negative. As the creator himself states this hasn't got a chance. JFitch (talk) 10:33, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Close per Dschwen. — raekyT 14:47, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --Makeemlighter (talk) 03:01, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]