Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of World Heritage Sites in Serbia/archive1

< Wikipedia:Featured list candidates
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 19:28, 5 January 2018 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of World Heritage Sites in Serbia edit

List of World Heritage Sites in Serbia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Toolbox
Nominator(s): Tone 15:51, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Following some related FL examples, such as the List of World Heritage Sites in Slovenia, I believe this list meets all criteria. Some prose tweaks may be required but I expect this to be sorted during the nomination process. Tone 15:51, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • As I mentioned for the Croatia list, there's no need for a 'Shared with' column. The description of the graveyards already has the other countries in the description, and the frontiers of the Roman Empire could easily include it. Reywas92Talk 01:21, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • Probably it's for the best if this part of discussion continues at Croatia list, the outcome should be of course applicable to both. --Tone 06:10, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment as I noted at the Croatia list, this can't be sorted chronologically. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:21, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    • As a side note, the list has now been adjusted to follow the style of Slovenia and Croatia. --Tone 19:14, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from BeatlesLedTV
  • Center the year columns.
  • Center the image columns, or at the the Start Ras image. Looks weird left aligned.

That's all I got. Great job! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 19:31, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 22:35, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • Lead is a little too short for my taste.
  • How is the UNESCO data column supposed to sort?
  • Is it "transnational" or "trans-national"?
  • Check all ref titles for MOS:DASH fails.
  • A singular dependency on the primary source here, not a major issue, but any other sources available?
  • Note needs referencing, it makes a lot of claims.
  • Link tetrapylon.
  • " gorges, Karst reliefs" no need to capitalise Karst.

The Rambling Man (talk) 09:36, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tone, it's a been a week, any chance of progress? The Rambling Man (talk) 10:11, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Let me take care of this in the following days. (also, I was planning to go through the lists you mentioned but realized they had been promoted a day before :/) --Tone 11:03, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The Rambling Man, I think I fixed them all now. I expanded the situation regarding Kosovo in the intro and therefore removed the note (introducing several 3rd-party references). The UNESCO data column should ideally sort by the serial number of the site, I do not know why it does not work. The year has been moved to a separate column for that purpose already. --Tone 21:41, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Check this out, it may well solve the issue and could be used on other such lists. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:47, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ha, perfect fix :) --Tone 21:48, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Hameltion (talk, contribs) 14:15, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
* Change "Currently" in lead to "As of" with {{As of}}?
    • I see you already fixed it. I agree.
  • The Stećci sites aren't linked in the map
    • True. My rationale is that the links would lead to articles about the settlements that actually say nothing about the Stećci sites, as opposed to other articles that are about the sites themselves.
  • Several names begin with "The" and should be sorted by the second word.
    • Fixed using data-sort-value.

I've additionally made these tweaks. --Hameltion (talk, contribs) 16:25, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hameltion, please check. And thank you for fixing the typos that I somehow missed... --Tone 09:47, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support—I also added one more as of template for good measure :) --Hameltion (talk, contribs) 14:15, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Giants2008 (Talk) 22:08, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comments –
  • Remove "has" from "and the government has decided to postpone future bids in 2017", as it interferes with the past tense that this is intended to be in.
  • Fortified Manasija Monastery: Minor point, but in the 1406/7 date range, there should probably be an en dash instead of a hyphen for style purposes.
  • The publisher of reference 7 (The Guardian) should be italicized as a print publication.
  • Refs 5 to 8 all have YYYY-MM-DD formatting, unlike the others. These should be changed to the style used in the other citations, for consistency. Giants2008 (Talk) 23:19, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Giants2008 Fixed, than you for pointing those out. --Tone 09:53, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support – All of my concerns have been addressed and I believe this meets FL standards. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:08, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Source review passed; I'm not a fan of including the website address in the references but you're using it consistently and also have the organization name, so it's not opposable. Promoting. --PresN 14:20, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/List_of_World_Heritage_Sites_in_Serbia/archive1&oldid=818817439"