Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of New York Mets first-round draft picks/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Dabomb87 15:25, 9 January 2010 [1].
- Nominator(s): Staxringold talkcontribs 02:35, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because I plan on creating this series of lists soon (for the Wikicup) and want to get the style down pat to make the process easier. This is built in the style of List of Philadelphia Phillies first-round draft picks, a featured list. Staxringold talkcontribs 02:35, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support from KV5 (Talk • Phils) 21:23, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from KV5 |
---|
Otherwise well done. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 18:33, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
Comments –
"played in the 1986 World Series for the Mets' 1986 championship team." No need to repeat 1986 like this. Perhaps try "second championship team"?
Major issue: most of the yearly Baseball-Reference links are redirecting to a page listing the number one overall picks. The 1965 link has a slightly different address than the rest, and is the only one that goes to the correct place for me.Giants2008 (27 and counting) 01:25, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll fix that shortly, they changed around the precise coding for the address to get to the right page. Staxringold talkcontribs 03:16, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- There, that should be all done. Staxringold talkcontribs 16:11, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments from Wrestlinglover
- Will begin tomorrow after I finish the GA review I currently have to do.--WillC 10:00, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't know alot about Baseball anymore since I haven't been apart of a team for 5 years and haven't watched in years either, but as far as I can tell this article is fine. Only problem I found was ref 12 is broken. I Support this list's nomination.--WillC 22:05, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the support and note, fixed that! Staxringold talkcontribs 00:59, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Mm40 (talk) 13:25, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Mm40 (talk) |
---|
Comments as promised from Mm40 (talk)
|
I'll support once these issues are resolved. Mm40 (talk) 18:23, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Well done, the captions are much better. Good luck in the WikiCup! Mm40 (talk) 13:25, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support – Now that I'm not a temp director anymore, I can now offer more than strikes to my comments. I only had a couple of comments to begin with (resolved long ago), and I think the criteria are met here. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 02:05, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.