Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Brazilian states by Gross Domestic Product/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was not promoted 03:11, 14 December 2007.
A very good list. Felipe C.S ( talk ) 20:25, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I like this list, and I find the inclusion of "comparable countries" very useful and interesting in the "GDP nominal" section to see how states are as productive as whole nations, but I doubt its usefulness in "GDP per capita" and "GDP participation". CG 19:42, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Excellent start, but falls short in the details:
- The text in the three subsections is copy-pasted, which is entirely inappropriate (at least define briefly the GDP variation you use, and how it affects the classification!)
- The color in the lead map are very confusing, especially as regions are not explicitly mentioned or linked. Having solid colors like those of Image:Brazil Labelled Map.svg would probably be a far better choice.
- I really doubt the state flags are really useful in this particular list.
- There is no reason to italicize the country names.
- While I agree that countries in "GDP participation" makes almost no sense (you should compare them to other states elsewhere for it to be meaningful), I think they are very appropriate in "GDP per capita".
- Circeus 21:26, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support (indented, nominator already supported by nominating)
- You can help in this topic? My English is not good.
- Is a list by states, not by regions.
- In the countrie's lists are useful.
- Done.
- Done.
- Felipe C.S ( talk ) 22:15, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support (indented, nominator already supported by nominating)
- Oppose Right now the table is completely messed up, and none of the questions raised above have been addressed. Like Circeus said, its a great start, but still need s lot of work. Maybe a WP:PR would help instead of FLC?
Gonzo fan2007 talk ♦ contribs 19:43, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.